The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
ANCIL: a new curriculum for information literacy: case study
Abstract
You have learned something. That always feels at first as if you had lost something. (H. G. Wells) Introduction Recent research suggests that the information-seeking behaviour and needs of students are changing (CIBER/UCL, 2008; SCONUL, 2011 among others), driven largely by the changing experiences and expectations of ‘the Google generation’, who have grown up with access to the internet being the norm. While the Google generation and ‘digital native’ terms have been debated and widely criticized (Jones et al., 2010), it is clear that information literacy programmes over the next five years will need to adapt and respond to the needs of current students. This case study describes a short project based at Cambridge University Library and funded by the Arcadia Programme (http://arcadiaproject. lib.cam.ac.uk), a three-year initiative designed to explore the role of academic libraries in the digital age. The project ran from May until July 2011 and sought to develop a practical curriculum for information literacy that meets the needs of the undergraduate student entering higher education over the next five years. A new curriculum for information literacy: project overview Aims and objectives The project sought to develop a practical curriculum for information literacy that meets the needs of the undergraduate student entering higher education over the next five years. Specifically, the project aimed: • to understand the information needs of future undergraduate students on enteri…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“studies showing that institutional impact is strongest when support mechanisms are coherently framed and pedagogically reinforced across programs (Secker and Coonan, 2012).”
From Information competence and critical thinking in digital environments evidence from university students in Kazakhstan (2026) · cites this paper as Secker and Coonan, 2012
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Envisioning the Academic Library: A Reflection on Roles, Relevancy and Relationships
Delaney, G., & Bates, J. (2015) · New Review of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1080/13614533.2014.911194 · Cited by 133
Information literacy outreach between universities and schools: A case study
Wagg, S., & McKinney, P. (2020) · Journal of Information Literacy · doi:10.11645/14.2.2692 · Cited by 5
Yrymbayeva, N., Yermekova, M., Tezekova, O., Issatayeva, B., Zhubandykova, A., & Tuxanbayev, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1809360 · Cited by 2
Popović, S. F., & Vilar, P. (2026) · Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science · doi:10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v49i1.23114
Metadata
- Authors
- Secker, J., & Coonan, E.
- Affiliations
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- Information Literacy Beyond Library 2.0
- Publisher
- Facet
- Published
- 2018-07-05
- Pages
- 171-190
- OpenAlex
- W4247315616
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Facet eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- information literacy, curriculum development, academic libraries, undergraduate students, information needs, Google generation, digital natives, information seeking, Cambridge University Library
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANCIL: a new curriculum for information literacy: case study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.29085/9781856048804.017
- The paper
- Secker, J., & Coonan, E. (2018). ANCIL: a new curriculum for information literacy: case study. Information Literacy Beyond Library 2.0. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856048804.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.