Roles and responsibilities: Libraries, librarians and data.
Abstract
E-science has the potential to be transformational within research libraries by impacting their operations, functions, and possibly even their mission. Lougee et al., 2007, 3 Introduction The management of the research data generated by e-science and e-research has replaced open access to scholarly publications as the hot topic on the academic library and information services agenda. National and international bodies have issued a succession of reports, policies and guidance on dealing with the ‘data deluge’ that have flagged the need for concerted action by research organizations. Government and other official publications have often identified roles for library and information professionals in managing data alongside the other information and knowledge resources that libraries manage or provide for their communities. Professional associations in the library world have responded positively to such suggestions and university librarians are now starting to develop services or get involved in projects to explore what libraries can do to support researchers in meeting new requirements of funding agencies to facilitate access to their data. Managing research data continues to be an emergent area of activity where responsibilities and practices within libraries are generally not yet firmly established, especially in the UK. However, there have been significant developments within the past few years, particularly in the USA, as a result of nationally funded project work and new requirements of research funding agencies for data management plans to be submitted with grant applications. Many libraries have seized these opportunities to form new partnerships and develop new services, which has in turn generated a growing body of literature on the subject offering insights and pointers for practitioners in other countries. In this chapter, we review the opportunities offered and the challenges presented for libraries and librarians in the research data arena, with particular reference to published reports and case studies of emerging practice, supplemented by evidence from university and library websites.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ayoib, A., Ismail, M. A., & Abdullah, N. (2026) · Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science · doi:10.22452/mjlis.vol31no1.2
“Limited attention has been given to how distinct data-related roles are structurally interconnected within academic libraries, or how these roles function together as an integrated governance workflow (Corrall, 2012; Cox et al., 2019b; Ho et al., 2025; Pratama, 2025).”
Influential
- Authors
- Corrall, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Corrall, Sheila
- ORCID
- Corrall, Sheila
- Venue
- Managing Research Data
- Publisher
- Facet
- Published
- 2018-07-05
- Pages
- 105-134
- OpenAlex
- W850334640
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 14.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Facet eBooks (publishedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Keywords
- research data management, research libraries, librarian roles, e-Science, data deluge, data management plans, research funding agencies, library services, data access
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review