Cited by 28Anthropological Studies and InsightsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsCross-Cultural and Social Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ethnography

Open access
Howell, Signe·2018·Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology

Abstract

Ethnographic fieldwork, carried out according to the method of long-term participant-observation, is what defines social anthropology. The method is inductive and open-ended. As such, the method directs the anthropologist to study that which is of significance to the community studied rather than test a number of hypotheses formulated in advance of the fieldwork. Anthropology is a comparative discipline, seeking to unravel the complexity and variety of human understanding and human social and cultural life. For this reason, anthropologists have sought out societies that seemed to be very different from their own and, during the first half of the twentieth century, most went to undertake their fieldwork in small - often minority - communities in Africa, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas. While this is still the case to a large extent, today many anthropologists have directed their ethnographic gaze toward communities closer to home. Thus the method of participant-observation is found to be useful by those who, for example, study life in a large bank, or the gay community in an American urban setting, as much as in a settlement in the Malaysian rain forest. The method is based on the paradoxical activity of participating fully in peoples’ lives, while simultaneously observing it from a distance. To base one’s study on the ‘native’s point of view’, and to disentangle what really goes on rather than what people say goes on, is one central advantage of the method. This forces the researcher to allow herself to be open to the unexpected event or utterance. The ethnographer always engages with contemporary anthropological theory in her interpretations. Ethnographic fieldwork is thus performed in active relationship with anthropological theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29164/18ethno

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Boas, F. 1966. Kwakiutl ethnography (ed. & abridged H. Codere). Chicago: University Press.
  2. Bellstorff, T. 2012. Ethnography and virtual worlds: a handbook of methods. Princeton: University Press.
  3. Geertz, C. 1968. Thinking as a moral act: ethical implications of anthropological fieldwork in the new states. Antioch Review 28, 139-58.
  4. Howell, S. 1997. Cultural studies and social anthropology: contesting or complementary discourses? In Anthropology and cultural studies (eds) S. Nugent & C. Shore, 103-125. London: Pluto Press.
  5. Lewin, E. & W.L. Leap (eds) 1996. Out in the field: reflection of lesbian and gay anthropologists. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
  6. Marcus, G. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited fieldwork. Annual Review of Anthropology 24, 95-117.
  7. Okely, J. 1996. Participatory and embodied knowledge. In Anthropology and autobiography (ASA Monograph 29) (eds) J. Okely & H. Callaway. London: Routledge.
  8. Needham, R. 1978. Essential perplexities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  9. Robbins, J. 2013. Beyond the suffering subject: towards an anthropology of the good. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19, 447-67
  10. Schapera, I. 1930. The Khoisan peoples of South Africa. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  11. Strathern, M. 1988. The gender of the gift: problems with women and problems with socieity in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  12. Her D.Phil was obtained at the University of Oxford and was based on 18 months of fieldwork with the Chewong -a hunter-gatherer community in the Malaysian rainforest. She has subsequently undertaken fieldwork in eastern Indonesia and she has performed a major study on values and practices of transnational adoption in Norway. She has published widely based on her three fieldworks.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Howell, S.
Affiliations
University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Howell, Signe
Venue
Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology
Published
2018-02-18
ISSN
2398-516X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4241960996
Cited by
28
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
Keywords
ethnographic fieldwork, participant observation, long-term fieldwork, inductive method, comparative analysis, anthropological theory, emic perspective, minority groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethnography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.29164/18ethno
The paper
Howell, S. (2018). Ethnography. Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.29164/18ethno