Cited by 8Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCriminal Law and Policy

Aboriginal Youth Overrepresentation in Canadian Correctional Services: Judicial and Non-Judicial Actors and Influence

Open access
Jackson, Nate·2015·Alberta Law Review

Abstract

The crisis of Aboriginal over-incarceration in Canada is one of the most well-documented features of our Criminal Justice System. This crisis is especially profound in the youth context. While the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) has reduced Canada’s overall youth incarceration rate in recent years, the relative proportion of detained Aboriginal youth has actually increased. This article explores Aboriginal youth overrepresentation in correctional services under the YCJA in an attempt to discern why it has been less effective at reducing custody rates for Aboriginal youth compared to their non-Aboriginal peers. This article suggests that the YCJA has failed to remedy Aboriginal youth overrepresentation because it has focused too heavily on sentencing principles and judicial discretion. It is argued that more attention must be paid to the earlier stages of the criminal justice process during which Police, Crown Attorneys, and Probation Officers exercise low-visibility discretion in ways that disproportionately circumscribe the eventual range of sentencing options available to Aboriginal youth offenders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29173/alr293

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weight given to static factors has resulted in Indigenous offenders' classification in higher risk/needs categories given persistent grim socioeconomic realities of Indigenous communities.

    “Given the persistent, grim socioeconomic realities of Indigenous communities, the weight given to static factors has resulted in their classification in higher risk/needs categories (Jackson, 2015; Milward, 2022).”

    From Colonization, Normalization and Risk-Assessment: The Case of Youth Criminal Justice Act and Correctional Overrepresentation of Indigenous Youth in Canada (2025) · cites this paper as Jackson, 2015

    The “PROBATION OFFICERS” section says that, given conditions facing Aboriginal communities, the weight assigned to static variables will often give an Aboriginal youth a higher need score and a higher-risk label. The citing sentence extends this youth-specific account to Indigenous offenders generally; our copy does not establish that broader scope. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jackson, N.
Corresponding author
Jackson, Nate
Venue
Alberta Law Review
Published
2015-09-25
ISSN
  • 0002-4821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1925-8356
OpenAlex
W187894889
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alberta Law Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
Aboriginal youth, juvenile detention, Youth Criminal Justice Act, judicial discretion, police discretion, probation officers, sentencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review