Erich Fromm’s critical theory: prophetic, scholarly or revolutionary?
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fromm's humanistic peace psychology remains a timely resource for addressing the emotional numbing and social fragmentation characteristic of the technological age.
“On this basis, Fromm’s humanistic peace psychology remains a timely resource for addressing the emotional numbing and social fragmentation characteristic of the technological age (McLaughlin, 2015).”
From Toward a humanized technology: a reinterpretation of Erich Fromm’ s humanistic peace psychology (2026) · cites this paper as McLaughlin, 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a humanized technology: a reinterpretation of Erich Fromm’ s humanistic peace psychology
Wang, Y., Li, P., & Liu, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1646601 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- McLaughlin, N.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Alberta Libraries
- Published
- 2015-06-24
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-250
- ISSN
- 0318-6431 (ISSN-L)
- 1710-1123
- OpenAlex
- W4242416056
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 12.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Canadian Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Marxism and Critical Theory
- Keywords
- Erich Fromm, critical theory, revolutionary theory, critical sociology, Frankfurt School
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
