Cited by 1Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationLibrary Science and Information Literacy

From Books to Bots: Scaffolding Ethical and Critical Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Open access
Oddone, Kay, Garrison, Kasey, Gagen-Spriggs, Krystal·2023·IASL Annual Conference Proceedings

Abstract

The use of AI in school education is still in its infancy (Southgate et al., 2018); however,there is an increasing expectation for teachers to become “AI Ready” – able to integrate AIsafely and effectively into student learning, teaching students about how AI works and theimportance of using these powerful tools ethically (Luckin et al., 2022 p. XIV). This researchproject acknowledges the leading role TLs can play in shifting mindsets and practiceregarding generative AI platforms and will provide the groundwork for future investigationswhich more deeply investigate specific implementations of these or other similar tools.While the initial response of school systems might be fight (locking down access) orflight (pretending these platforms do not exist), a planned and informed strategy forembedding AI capabilities into educational practice, led by the TL as an information andpedagogical expert, is more likely to bring about long-term positive outcomes for studentswho will be learning and living in a world increasingly shaped by algorithms and automation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29173/iasl8740

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adding a generative AI chatbot to scaffolding and peer-to-peer learning will further equip students.

    “The addition of a generative AI chatbot into this mix will only equip students further (Oddone et al, 2023).”

    From Enhancing Information Literacy through Generative AI in the Library Classroom (2025) · cites this paper as Oddone et al, 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oddone, K., Garrison, K., & Gagen-Spriggs, K.
Affiliations
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Venue
IASL Annual Conference Proceedings
Published
2023-11-13
ISSN
2562-8372 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389976941
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IASL Annual Conference Proceedings (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
generative AI in education, teacher leadership, AI readiness, school libraries, information literacy, AI ethics education, AI in teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review