Cited by 0Art, Politics, and ModernismIndigenous Cultures and HistoryDecolonial Thought and Epistemologies

(Re)constructing Indigenous Linguistic Refusal Beyond the Settler Gaze: Rebecca Belmore and Jalvvi Niillas Holmberg

Open access
Sutherland, Charlie·2025·Scandinavian-Canadian Studies

Abstract

Indigenous art, aestheticisms, and other creative expressions represent a critical threat to settler colonial neoliberalism, working within, between, and beyond the parameters, definitions, and conventions of the Western art world. Using the concept of “Indigenous refusal” as a grounding framework, this article complicates the hegemonic relationship between settler fantasy and embodied Indigenous reality, exploring the ways that contemporary Indigenous artists Rebecca Belmore (Anishinaabe) and Jalvvi Niilas Holmberg (Sámi) foster Indigenous futurity through their artistic engagements with the presence and absence of language. Through a comparative analysis of Belmore’s 2013 performance piece Apparition and Holmberg’s second studio album, Luođik (2024), this paper argues that Belmore and Holmberg’s respective works map distinct geographies of refusal, exercising a sonic sovereignty in the service of disrupting the settler gaze. Building on previous decolonial scholarly work on the politics of refusal, reconciliation, and representation, this comparative approach makes obvious the thread of transnational Indigenous solidarity that links Belmore and Holmberg’s respective works together.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29173/scancan274

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Sutherland, C.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Sutherland, Charlie
Venue
Scandinavian-Canadian Studies
Published
2025-12-31
Volume
32
ISSN
  • 0823-1796 (ISSN-L)
  • 2816-5187
OpenAlex
W7117934489
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian-Canadian Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Politics, and Modernism
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
Keywords
Rebecca Belmore, settler colonialism, Indigenous futurity, indigenous languages, performance art, ghosts, Anishinaabe, Sami, decolonial art

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review