CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 104STEM EducationEducational Methods and OutcomesEducation and Critical Thinking Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Effectiveness of STEM Learning Based on Design Thinking in Improving Critical Thinking Skills in Science Learning: A Meta-Analysis

Open access
Zulyusri, Zulyusri, Santosa, Tomi Apra, Festiyed, Festiyed, Yerimadesi, Yerimadesi, Yohandri, Yohandri, Razak, Abdul, Sofianora, Aulia·2023·Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA
DOI 10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3709
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of Design Thinking-based STEM learning in improving students' critical thinking skills in science learning. This research is a type of meta-analysis research. Data sources in the study came from 100 national and international journals published from 2017-2023. Search for data sources through google scholar, Eric, Wiley, Taylor of Francis, Sciencedirect, and ProQuest. Data collection techniques through direct observation through the journal database. The keywords used in the search are STEM model, Design Thinking, Critical thinking skills and Science learning. Data analysis technique is quantitative descriptive analysis with JSAP application. The effect size of each study on the STEM learning model based on design thinking in science learning is 0.84 with large criteria. The results of the study can be concluded that the STEM learning model based on design thinking is effective for improving critical thinking skills in science learning. STEM learning model based on design thinking is very good to be applied in science learning in Indonesia

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3709

Cites

49 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Daga, A. T., Wahyudin, D., & Susilana, R. (2022). An Investigation of Developing Indonesian Elementary School Students' Critical Thinking Skills: A Literature Review. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(3), 1752-1766. Retrieved from http://ijci.wcci- international.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/93
  2. Ichsan, Santosa, T. A., Ilwandri, Sofianora, A., & Yastanti, U. (2022). Efektivitas Evaluasi Model CIPP Dalam Pembelajaran IPA di Indonesia: Meta- Analisis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 5(2), 1349- 1358. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v5i2.13435 · DOI
  3. Ichsan, Suhaimi, Amalia Nur Kodzijah, Santosa Tomi Apra, & Yulianti Sisi. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Berbasis TPACK Terhadap Ketrampilan Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Siswa Tingkat SD Sampai SMA: Sebuah Meta-Analisis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(5), 2173-2181. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i5.6931 · DOI
  4. Kanmaz, A. (2022). Middle School Teachers' Critical Thinking Skills and Awareness Towards Teaching Critical Thinking Skills. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 9(4), 1648-1671. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1353469
  5. Topsakal, İ., Yalçın, S. A., & Çakır, Z. (2022). The Effect of Problem-based STEM Education on the Students' Critical Thinking Tendencies and Their Perceptions for Problem Solving Skills. Science Education International, 33(2), 136-145. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i2. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zulyusri, Z., Santosa, T. A., Festiyed, F., Yerimadesi, Y., Yohandri, Y., Razak, A., & Sofianora, A.
Affiliations
Universitas Negeri Padang (ID)
ORCID
Venue
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA
Publisher
Universitas Mataram
Published
2023-06-25
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
112-119
ISSN
  • 2407-795X (ISSN-L)
  • 2460-2582
DOI
10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3709
OpenAlex
W4382071564
Cited by
48
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universitas Negeri Padang
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › STEM Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
Keywords
STEM learning, design thinking, critical thinking skills, science learning, teaching effectiveness, effect size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review