The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effect of Layered Curriculum on Reflective Thinking and on Self-Directed Learning Readiness of Prospective Teachers
Open accessAbstract
Teachers are important role models for pupils. They should be reflective practitioners and self-directed learners. Teacher training process should promote being a reflective thinker and a self-directed learner. Curriculum should be designed in accordance with constructivism. The aim of this research is to investigate effects of layered curriculum on pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking level and on self-directed learning readiness. In this study sequential mixed method design is used. A pretest-posttest control group design (quantitative phase) and a semi-structured interview (qualitative phase) are used. Layered curriculum is determined to have positive effects on participants’ reflective thinking level and self-directed learning. According to findings of this research, layered curriculum can be an alternative way to improve pre-service teachers’ readiness for self-directed learning and reflective thinking levels.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Reflective thinking encourages individuals to think critically about their strategies, evaluate their progress, and take appropriate steps in problem-solving (Gencel & Saracaloglu, 2018).”
From Measuring undergraduate students’ reliance on generative AI during problem-solving: Scale development and validation. (2025) · cites this paper as Gencel & Saracaloglu, 2018
Citations
Cites
Effective Reflective Practice: In Search of Meaning in Learning about Teaching
Loughran, J. J. (2002) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487102053001004 · Cited by 1,231
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hou, C., Zhu, G., Sudarshan, V., Lim, F. S., & Ong, Y. S. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105329 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Unıversıty, C. O. M., Evin Gencel, I., Adnan Menderes University, & Saracaloğlu, A. S.
- ORCID
- Saracaloğlu, A. Seda
- Venue
- International Journal of Progressive Education
- Publisher
- Pen Academic Publishing
- Published
- 2018-02-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-20
- ISSN
- 1554-5210 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2789426539
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 19.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- International Journal of Progressive Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University AVESIS (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- reflective thinking, self-directed learning readiness, pre-service teachers, teacher professional development, constructivism, reflective practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review