The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
Open accessAbstract
The Coding Manual fourth edition is reformatted to 15 chapters and divided into three parts, as opposed to six chapters in the third edition.This provides readers with more straightforward yet more detailed sectional references.The fourth edition also introduces two new first-cycle coding methods, 'metaphor coding' and 'theming the data categorically.'The fourth edition is aptly suited as a guide for teaching contexts for coding processes, given the provision of a companion website with student exercises and digital content.This includes screenshots of relevant academic software for analyzing the material and detailed thematic mapping diagrams.Furthermore, this book can assist novice researchers in determining the appropriate approaches to reinforce their perspectives and provide incremental processes for qualitative coding data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Cited by
Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014522633 · Cited by 4,395
Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers
Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019) · SAGE Open Medicine · doi:10.1177/2050312118822927 · Cited by 1,869
Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 · Cited by 1,990
Applying critical realism in qualitative research: Methodology meets method
Fletcher, A. J. (2017) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401 · Cited by 1,343
From Data Management to Actionable Findings: A Five-Phase Process of Qualitative Data Analysis
Bingham, A. J. (2023) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069231183620 · Cited by 819
Metadata
- Authors
- Lungu, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Qualitative Research
- Publisher
- Modestum Ltd
- Published
- 2022-05-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 232-237
- ISSN
- 2576-2141 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4281564584
- Cited by
- 10,826
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3235.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.29333/ajqr/12085
- The paper
- Lungu, M. (2022). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. American Journal of Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
