Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The effect of the interaction between crowdsourced style and cognitive style on developing research and scientific thinking skills

Alabdulaziz, Mansour Saleh, Hassan, Hassan F., Soliman, Mohamed W.·2022·Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
DOI 10.29333/ejmste/12428
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29333/ejmste/12428

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 4

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Abbas, I., & Al-Jabbas, N. (2020). The effect of the interaction between the presentation style of the interactive infographic content and the cognitive style in developing critical reading skills and self-efficacy among middle school students. Journal of the College of Education in Educational Sciences, 44(1), 305-412.
  2. Ahmed, M. J. K. (2013). The effectiveness of a program based on variation in the timing of providing feedback through Facebook to acquire the skills of using digital libraries and virtual social interaction among the library and information specialist. Education Journal, 1(155), 14-115.
  3. Akl, M. S. S., & Khamis, M. A. (2012). Designing an electronic learning environment to develop the skills of designing learning elements. Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 1(13), 387-417.
  4. Al-Ahwal, A. (2016). A proposed training program for developing scientific research skills and innovative thinking among postgraduate students “Master’s stage” at Al-Jouf University. Journal of the College of Education in Educational Sciences, 40(1), 147-222.
  5. Al-Aklabi, A. (2009). The extent of benefit from electronic information sources in university education at the universities of King Saud, Imam and Nayef Arab Universities for Security Sciences [Master’s thesis, Naif Arab University for Security Sciences].
  6. Al-Azab, N. (2015). The effectiveness of web-based educational activities (internet hunter) in developing some information search skills for female students of higher education in special education at King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on E-Learning and Distance Education.
  7. Al-Bassiouni, M. R. (2012). Developing an electronic learning environment in the light of constructivist learning theories to develop object-oriented programming skills for students of computer teachers. Journal of the Faculty of Education in Mansoura, 78(2), 293-371.
  8. Al-Dhafiri, F., & Al-Suwait, A. (2013). Kuwait University faculty members’ use of digital information sources. In Proceedings of the 2nd Regional Conference for E-Learning: E-Learning, Present and Future.
  9. Al-Hadarb, K., & Al-Kilani, A. (2018). The effectiveness of employing the educational platform in developing scientific thinking and life skills among students of the Faculty of Educational Sciences at the University of Jordan [PhD thesis International Islamic University of Sciences].
  10. Al-Hayes, A. (2011). Methodological directions for master’s theses in the Department of Sociology and Social Work at Sultan Qaboos University. In Proceedings of the 1st International Forum: Improving Scientific Messages and Theses and Activating Their Security Role (pp. 465-510).
  11. Al-Hinnawi, A, A., Alostaz, M. H., & Khamis, M. A. (2013). The effectiveness of a collaborative learning strategy via the web on developing critical thinking and social learning skills among Al-Aqsa University students in Gaza. Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 23(2), 541-615.
  12. Al-Jarf, R. S. (2017). Skills of integrating electronic information sources into the educational process at the university level. King Fahd National Library Journal, 23(1), 89-122.
  13. Al-Khathami, M. (2010). The extent of the use of electronic information sources: A case study of faculty members at the College of Computer and Information Sciences at Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University in Riyadh. King Fahd National Library Journal, 1(16), 113-130.
  14. Al-Kmaishi, L. A. (2014). Information and digital age skills specialist. Libraries and Information Journal, (12), 35-48.
  15. Bandyopadhyay, S., Bardhan, A., Dey, P., Das, S., Ghosh, S., & Biswas, P. (2016). “Education for all” in a connected world: A social technology-driven framework for e-mobilizing dormant knowledge capital through sharism and mass collaboration. Procedia Engineering, 159, 284-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.180 · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.180
  16. Barbosa, C. E., Epelbaum, V. J., Antelio, M., & Oliveira, J. (2014). Conceptual crowdsourcing models for e learning. In Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (pp. 1121-1127). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2014.6974064 · doi:10.1109/smc.2014.6974064
  17. Corneli, J., & Mikroyannidis, A. (2012). Crowdsourcing education on web: A role-based analysis of online learning communities. In A. Okada, T. Connolly, & P. Scott (Eds.), Collaborative learning 2.0: Open educational resources (pp. 272-286). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0300-4.ch015 · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0300-4.ch015
  18. Cross, A., Bayyapunedi, M., Ravindran, D., Cutrell, E., & Thies, W. (2014). VidWiki: Enabling the crowd to improve the legibility of online educational videos. In Proceedings of the 170th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1167-1175). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531670 · DOI
  19. De Alfaro, L., & Shavlovsky, M. (2014). Crowd grader: A tool for crowdsourcing the evaluation of homework assignments. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 415-420). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538900 · DOI
  20. Faisal, M. H., Alameri, A. W., & Alsumait, A. A. (2015). An adaptive e-learning framework: Crowdsourcing approach. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Integration and Web’ based Applications & Services. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2837185.2837249 · DOI
  21. Feng, Y., Yi, Z., Yang, C., Chen, R., & Fenf, Y. (2022). How do gamification mechanics drive solvers’ knowledge contribution? A study of collaborative knowledge crowdsourcing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177(2-3), 121520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121520 · DOI
  22. Frigerio, S., Schenato, L., & Bossi, G. (2018). Crowdsourcing with mobile techniques for crisis support. In I. Marchesini, & A. Pierleoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Open-Source Geospatial Research and Education Symposium.
  23. Gouda, A. (2018). The use of mind maps in the two e-learning strategies (individual and group) on the Facebook platform to develop research skills in the Egyptian Knowledge Bank among educational technology students. Educational Technology: The Egyptian Association for Educational Technology, 28(4), 95-161. https://doi.org/10.21608/tesr.2018.71765 · doi:10.21608/tesr.2018.71765
  24. Heusler, A., & Spann, M. (2014). Knowledge stock exchanges: A co-optative crowdsourcing mechanism for e-learning. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems 2014.
  25. Ibrahim, H., & Abdo, A. (2016). The impact of using electronic support in mobile learning on developing research skills in electronic information sources for postgraduate students in the College of Education. International Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 1, 12-84.
  26. Ismail, A. (2018). The two electronic brainstorming strategies (individual, group) in the Google Plus environment and the effect of their interaction with the two control points (internal, external) in developing the skills of educational design and scientific thinking among postgraduate students and their involvement in the environment. Educational Technology: The Egyptian Association for Educational Technology, 28(3), 107-243.
  27. Jin, H., Chang, M., & Kim, J. (2019). Solve deep: A system for supporting sub goal learning in online math problem solving. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312822 · DOI
  28. Karataev, E., & Zadorozhny, Y. (2017). Adaptive social learning based on crowdsourcing. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(2), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2515097 · DOI
  29. Melville, N. P. (2014). Crowd-sourced peer feedback (CPF) for learning community engagement: Results and reflections from a pilot study in 2014 47th Hawaii. In Proceedings of the International Conference on System Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.14 · DOI
  30. Morschheuser, B., Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Maedche, A. (2017) Gamified crowdsourcing: Conceptualization, literature review. an, future agenda. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 106(26), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Parsons, D., Lynch, J., Han, B., & Thorn, R. (2017). Hack education. Crowdsourcing the future of education in New Zealand. In S. Nash, & L. L. M. Patston (Eds.), Proceedings of the Spaces and Pedagogies: New Zealand Tertiary Learning and Teaching Conference 2017 (pp. 57-66). Unite Institute of Technology.
  32. Paulin, D., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2016). Crowdsourcing the curriculum: Redefining e-learning practices through peer-generated approaches. The Information Society, 32(2), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1130501 · DOI
  33. Qamouh, N., Bourdban, E., & Boukhalifa, K. (2015). Competencies and specifications of the information specialist to adapt to the digital environment. In Proceedings of the Special Libraries Association-Arabian Gulf Chapter 21st Annual Conference. https://doi.org/10.5339/qproc.2015.gsla.9 · doi:10.5339/qproc.2015.gsla.9
  34. Qaoud, N. (2016). The effect of the interaction of the cognitive method (focusing/scanning) and the integration strategy between the learning cycle and concept maps on the academic achievement of a sample of the second year middle school students. Psychological Counseling Journal, 47(5), 124-169. https://doi.org/10.21608/CPC.2016.48948 · doi:10.21608/cpc.2016.48948
  35. Rizk, N. M., Gheith, M. H., Zaki, A. M., & Nasr, E. S. (2019). CREeLS: Crowdsourcing based requirements elicitation for eLearning systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(10), 242-251. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0101034 · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0101034
  36. Robb, D. A., Padilla, S., Kalkreuter, B., & Chantler, M. J. (2015). Crowdsourced feedback with imagery rather than text: Would designers use it? In Proceedings of the CHI 2015. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702470 · DOI
  37. Sahwan, I. (2019). The effectiveness of a training program based on critical thinking skills in developing scientific research skills among postgraduate students. Educational Sciences, 27(1), 436-544.
  38. Said, S. M. (2011). Skills of using digital resources: a case study of faculty members at the Faculty of Engineering at Tikrit University. Adab Al-basrah Journal, (59), 379-425.
  39. Saiti, A., & Prokopiadoub, G. (2008). Post-graduates students and learning environments: Users perceptions regarding the choice of information sources. Journal the International Information & Library Review, 40(2), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iilr.2008.02.003 · DOI
  40. Sayed, R. F. A. (2016). Digital libraries evaluation: Case study of world digital library. Alam Refereed Scientific Journal, (17), 139-190.
  41. Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Abdullah, N. I., Hussain, A., & Fareed, M. (2020). COVID-19 impact on e-commerce usage: An empirical evidence from Malaysian healthcare industry. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(3), 599-609. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8364 · DOI
  42. Sheinfeld, S. (2016). Video summarization using causality graphs [MSc. dissertation, School of Computer Science, The Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya].
  43. Skarzauskaite, M. (2012). The application of crowd sourcing in educational activities. Socializes Technologists, 2(1), 67-76.
  44. Solemon, B., Ariffin, I., Din, M. M., & Anwar, R. M. (2013). A review of the uses of crowdsourcing in higher education. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(9), 2066-2073.

Metadata

Authors
Alabdulaziz, M. S., Hassan, H. F., & Soliman, M. W.
Venue
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Publisher
Modestum Ltd
Published
2022-09-06
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
em2162
ISSN
  • 1305-8215
  • 1305-8223
DOI
10.29333/ejmste/12428
Cited by
4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of the interaction between crowdsourced style and cognitive style on developing research and scientific thinking skills. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.29333/ejmste/12428
The paper
Alabdulaziz, M. S., Hassan, H. F., & Soliman, M. W. (2022). The effect of the interaction between crowdsourced style and cognitive style on developing research and scientific thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12428

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.