Cited by 153Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

Developing Alternative Indices of Reproductive Potential for Use in Fisheries Management: Case Studies for Stocks Spanning an Information Gradient

Open access
Marshall, C T, O'Brien, L, Tomkiewicz, J, Köster, F W, Kraus, G, Marteinsdottir, G, Morgan, M J, Saborido-Rey, F +5 more·2003·Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence to suggest that spawning stock biomass (SSB) may not be directly proportional to reproductive potential.The wide-ranging implications of this conclusion necessitate that it be tested for as many stocks as possible.Undertaking such tests is complicated by the fact that fish stocks vary in the amount and type of information that is available to estimate reproductive potential.In this review, nine stocks illustrate the range of

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2960/j.v33.a8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Total egg production is considered a more accurate representation of the reproductive potential of a species than spawning stock biomass because it accounts for the size (or age) composition of the spawning population and changes in annual fecundity with fish size/age.

    “Total egg production is considered a more accurate representation of the reproductive potential of a species than spawning stock biomass as the size (or age) composition of the spawning population, and changes in annual fecundity with fish size/age, are taken into account in the former [1, 2].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. DENNEY, N. H., S. JENNINGS, and J. D. REYNOLDS. 2002. Life-history correlates of maximum population growth rates in marine fishes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 269: 22292237.
  2. GOODYEAR, C. P. 1985. Relationship between reported commercial landings and abundance of young striped bass in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 114: 9296.
  3. GOODYEAR, C. P., J. E. COHEN, and S. W. CHRISTIAN- SEN. 1985. Maryland striped bass: recruitment declining below replacement. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 114: 146 151.
  4. HARDARDÓTTIR, K. MS 2001. Relationship between atresia, fish size and condition in Icelandic cod (Gadus morhua L.). Thesis for Cand. Scien. degree, Department of Fisheries and Marine Biology, University of Bergen, December 2001.
  5. D. MS 1998b. Report of the Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group. ICES C.M. Doc., No. 1998/ ACFM:16. MS 1999. Report of the Arctic Fisheries Working Group. ICES C.M. Doc., 1999/ACFM:3. MS 2001a. Report of the Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group. ICES C.M. Doc., No. 2001/ ACFM:18. MS 2001b. Report of the Arctic Fisheries Working Group. ICES C.M. Doc., No. 2001/ACFM:02. MS 2001c. Report of the Arctic Fisheries Working Group. ICES C.M. Doc., No. 2001/ACFM:19. MS 2002a. Report of the Arctic Fisheries Working Group. ICES C.M. Doc., No. 2002/ACFM:18. ICES ACFM. MS 2002b. Report of the Study Group on the further development of the Precautionary Approach to fisheries management. ICES C.M. Doc., No. 2002/ACFM:10. MS 2003a. Report of the Study Group on the further development of the Precautionary Approach to fisheries management. ICES C.M. Doc., No. 2003/ ACFM:in press. MS 2003b. Report of the Study Group on Biological Reference Points for Northeast Arctic cod.
  6. NAFO. MS 1997. Report of the Ad hoc Working Group of the NAFO Scientific Council on the Precautionary Approach. NAFO SCS Doc., No. 12, Serial No. N2911, 61 p. MS 1998. Report of the Scientific Council workshop on the precautionary approach to fisheries management. NAFO SCR Doc. No. 76, Serial No. N3069, 62 p. MS 2000. Scientific Council Reports 2000.
  7. OLSEN, E. J., and R. A. RULIFSON. 1992. Maturation and fecundity of Roanoke River-Albemarle Sound striped bass. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 121: 524537.
  8. VETTER, E. F. 1988. Estimation of natural mortality in fish stocks: a review. Fish. Bull. U.S., 86: 2543.
  9. VÁZQUEZ, A., and S. CERVIÑO. MS 2001. A review of the status of the cod stock in NAFO Division 3M.
  10. ZASTROW, C. E., E. D. HOUDE, and E. H. SAUNDERS. 1989. Quality of striped bass (Morone saxitalis) eggs in relation to river source and female weight. ICES Proc.- Verb., 191: 2442.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marshall, C. T., O'Brien, L., Tomkiewicz, J., Köster, F. W., Kraus, G., Marteinsdottir, G., Morgan, M. J., Saborido-Rey, F., Blanchard, J. L., Secor, D. H., Wright, P. J., Mukhina, N. V., & Björnsson, H.
Affiliations
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
  • GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (DE)
  • University of Iceland (IS)
  • Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB)
  • University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
Venue
Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science
Published
2003-12
Volume
33
Pages
161-190
ISSN
  • 0250-6408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1682-9786
  • 1811-8224
OpenAlex
W2022442960
Cited by
153
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Keywords
fertility, spawning stock biomass, fisheries management, fish stock assessment, information gradient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review