The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-Octreotide PET in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison with Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy and CT
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a new somatostatin analog, (68)Ga-labeled 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid-d-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide ((68)Ga-DOTA-TOC), for PET in patients with known or suspected neuroendocrine tumors. PET was compared with conventional scintigraphy and dedicated CT. METHODS: Eighty-four patients (48 men, 36 women; age range, 28-79 y; mean age +/- SD, 58.2 +/- 12.2 y) were prospectively studied. For analysis, patients were divided into 3 groups: detection of unknown primary tumor in the presence of clinical or biochemical suspicion of neuroendocrine malignancy (n = 13 patients), initial tumor staging (n = 36 patients), and follow-up after therapy (n = 35 patients). Each patient received 100-150 MBq (68)Ga-DOTA-TOC. Imaging results of PET were compared with (99m)Tc-labeled hydrazinonicotinyl-Tyr(3)-octreotide ((99m)Tc-HYNIC-TOC) and (111)In-DOTA-TOC. CT was also performed on every patient using a multidetector scanner. Each imaging modality was interpreted separately by observers who were unaware of imaging findings before comparison with PET. The gold standard for defining true-positive (TP), true-negative (TN), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) results was based on all available histologic, imaging, and follow-up findings. RESULTS: PET was TP in 69 patients, TN in 12 patients, FP in 1 patient, and FN in 2 patients, indicating a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 92%, and an accuracy of 96%. The FP finding was caused by enhanced tracer accumulation in the pancreatic head, and the FN results were obtained in patients with a tumor of the gastrointestinal tract displaying liver metastases. (68)Ga-DOTA-TOC showed higher diagnostic efficacy compared with SPECT (TP in 37 patients, TN in 12 patients, FP in 1 patient, and FN in 34 patients) and diagnostic CT (TP in 41 patients, TN in 12 patients, FP in 5 patients, and FN in 26 patients). This difference was of statistical significance (P < 0.001). However, the combined use of PET and CT showed the highest overall accuracy. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-DOTA-TOC PET shows a significantly higher detection rate compared with conventional somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and diagnostic CT with clinical impact in a considerable number of patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors: accuracy of helical CT versus SRS.
Kumbasar, B., Kamel, I. R., Tekes, A., Eng, J., Fishman, E. K., & Wahl, R. L. (2004) · Abdominal Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00261-003-0162-3 · Cited by 84
Cited by
Pavel, M., Baudin, E., Couvelard, A., Krenning, E., Öberg, K., Steinmüller, T., Anlauf, M., Wiedenmann, B., & Salazar, R. (2012) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000335597 · Cited by 873
ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Jejunum and Ileum
Niederle, B., Pape, U.-F., Costa, F., Gross, D., Kelestimur, F., Knigge, U., Öberg, K., Pavel, M., Perren, A., Toumpanakis, C., et al. (2016) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000443170 · Cited by 474
Cushing's syndrome: epidemiology and developments in disease management
Feelders, R., Sharma, S., & Nieman, L. (2015) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s44336 · Cited by 210
Unexpected Sensitivity of sst2 Antagonists to N-Terminal Radiometal Modifications
Fani, M., Braun, F., Waser, B., Beetschen, K., Cescato, R., Erchegyi, J., Rivier, J. E., Weber, W. A., Maecke, H. R., & Reubi, J. C. (2012) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.102764 · Cited by 172
Innovative imaging of insulinoma: the end of sampling? A review
Christ, E., Antwi, K., Fani, M., & Wild, D. (2020) · Endocrine-Related Cancer · doi:10.1530/erc-19-0476 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Gabriel, M., Decristoforo, C., Kendler, D., Dobrozemsky, G., Heute, D., Uprimny, C., Kovacs, P., Von Guggenberg, E., Bale, R., & Virgolini, I. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2007-04-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 508-518
- ISSN
- 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986723218
- Cited by
- 1,010
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-Octreotide PET in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison with Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy and CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.106.035667
- The paper
- Gabriel, M., Decristoforo, C., Kendler, D., Dobrozemsky, G., Heute, D., Uprimny, C., Kovacs, P., Von Guggenberg, E., Bale, R., & Virgolini, I. J. (2007). 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-Octreotide PET in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison with Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy and CT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.106.035667
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.