The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monitoring and Predicting Response to Therapy with 18F-FDG PET in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Molecular imaging with (18)F-FDG PET has been proven useful in the management of colorectal cancer. (18)F-FDG PET plays a pivotal role in staging before surgical resection of recurrent colorectal cancer and metastases, in the localization of recurrence in patients with an unexplained rise in serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and in the assessment of residual masses after treatment. Currently, there is increasing interest in the role of (18)F-FDG PET beyond staging. The technique appears to have significant potential for the characterization of tumors and for the prediction of prognosis in the context of treatment stratification and early assessment of tumor response to therapy. This systematic review provides an overview of the literature on the value of (18)F-FDG PET for monitoring and predicting the response to therapy in colorectal cancer. The review covers chemotherapy response monitoring in advanced colorectal cancer, monitoring of the effects of local ablative therapies, and preoperative radiotherapy and multimodality treatment response evaluation in primary rectal cancer. Given the added value of (18)F-FDG PET for these indications, implementation in clinical practice and systematic inclusion in therapeutic trials to exploit the potential of (18)F-FDG PET are warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed Central · doi:10.2967/jnumed.120.251744a · Cited by 1,172
Effects of Nonionic Intravenous Contrast Agents at PET/CT Imaging: Phantom and Canine Studies
Nakamoto, Y., Chin, B. B., Kraitchman, D. L., Lawler, L. P., Marshall, L. T., & Wahl, R. L. (2003) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2273020299 · Cited by 111
Cited by
Adam, R., de Gramont, A., Figueras, J., Kokudo, N., Kunstlinger, F., Loyer, E., Poston, G., Rougier, P., Rubbia-Brandt, L., Sobrero, A., et al. (2015) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.06.006 · Cited by 607
Repeatability of 18F-FDG Uptake Measurements in Tumors: A Metaanalysis
de Langen, A. J., Vincent, A., Velasquez, L. M., van Tinteren, H., Boellaard, R., Shankar, L. K., Boers, M., Smit, E. F., Stroobants, S., Weber, W. A., et al. (2012) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.111.095299 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- de Geus-Oei, L.-F., Vriens, D., van Laarhoven, H. W. M., van der Graaf, W. T. A., & Oyen, W. J. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2009-04-29
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- Suppl 1
- Pages
- 43S-54S
- ISSN
- 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-662X
- OpenAlex
- W2109509934
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monitoring and Predicting Response to Therapy with 18F-FDG PET in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.108.057224
- The paper
- de Geus-Oei, L.-F., Vriens, D., van Laarhoven, H. W. M., van der Graaf, W. T. A., & Oyen, W. J. G. (2009). Monitoring and Predicting Response to Therapy with 18F-FDG PET in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.057224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
