The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Tumor Textural Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Associated with Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy?
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: There is evidence in some solid tumors that textural features of tumoral uptake in (18)F-FDG PET images are associated with response to chemoradiotherapy and survival. We have investigated whether a similar relationship exists in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Fifty-three patients (mean age, 65.8 y; 31 men, 22 women) with NSCLC treated with chemoradiotherapy underwent pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans. Response was assessed by CT Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) at 12 wk. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local PFS (LPFS) were recorded. Primary tumor texture was measured by the parameters coarseness, contrast, busyness, and complexity. The following parameters were also derived from the PET data: primary tumor standardized uptake values (SUVs) (mean SUV, maximum SUV, and peak SUV), metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis. RESULTS: Compared with nonresponders, RECIST responders showed lower coarseness (mean, 0.012 vs. 0.027; P = 0.004) and higher contrast (mean, 0.11 vs. 0.044; P = 0.002) and busyness (mean, 0.76 vs. 0.37; P = 0.027). Neither complexity nor any of the SUV parameters predicted RECIST response. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, OS, PFS, and LPFS were lower in patients with high primary tumor coarseness (median, 21.1 mo vs. not reached, P = 0.003; 12.6 vs. 25.8 mo, P = 0.002; and 12.9 vs. 20.5 mo, P = 0.016, respectively). Tumor coarseness was an independent predictor of OS on multivariable analysis. Contrast and busyness did not show significant associations with OS (P = 0.075 and 0.059, respectively), but PFS and LPFS were longer in patients with high levels of each (for contrast: median of 20.5 vs. 12.6 mo, P = 0.015, and median not reached vs. 24 mo, P = 0.02; and for busyness: median of 20.5 vs. 12.6 mo, P = 0.01, and median not reached vs. 24 mo, P = 0.006). Neither complexity nor any of the SUV parameters showed significant associations with the survival parameters. CONCLUSION: In NSCLC, baseline (18)F-FDG PET scan uptake showing abnormal texture as measured by coarseness, contrast, and busyness is associated with nonresponse to chemoradiotherapy by RECIST and with poorer prognosis. Measurement of tumor metabolic heterogeneity with these parameters may provide indices that can be used to stratify patients in clinical trials for lung cancer chemoradiotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goldstraw, P., Crowley, J., Chansky, K., Giroux, D. J., Groome, P. A., Rami-Porta, R., Postmus, P. E., Rusch, V., & Sobin, L. (2007) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e31812f3c1a · Cited by 3,655
Cited by
Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers
Parmar, C., Grossmann, P., Bussink, J., Lambin, P., & Aerts, H. J. W. L. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep13087 · Cited by 1,019
Intrinsic dependencies of CT radiomic features on voxel size and number of gray levels
Shafiq‐ul‐Hassan, M., Zhang, G. G., Latifi, K., Ullah, G., Hunt, D. C., Balagurunathan, Y., Abdalah, M. A., Schabath, M. B., Goldgof, D. G., Mackin, D., et al. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12123 · Cited by 585
Defining the biological basis of radiomic phenotypes in lung cancer
Grossmann, P., Stringfield, O., El-Hachem, N., Bui, M. M., Rios Velazquez, E., Parmar, C., Leijenaar, R. T., Haibe-Kains, B., Lambin, P., Gillies, R. J., et al. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.23421 · Cited by 365
Radiomics: a new application from established techniques
Parekh, V., & Jacobs, M. A. (2016) · Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development · doi:10.1080/23808993.2016.1164013 · Cited by 369
Larue, R. T. H. M., Defraene, G., De Ruysscher, D., Lambin, P., & van Elmpt, W. (2017) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20160665 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, G. J. R., Yip, C., Siddique, M., Goh, V., Chicklore, S., Roy, A., Marsden, P., Ahmad, S., & Landau, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2012-11-30
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-26
- ISSN
- 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-662X
- OpenAlex
- W2008108075
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Tumor Textural Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Associated with Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.112.107375
- The paper
- Cook, G. J. R., Yip, C., Siddique, M., Goh, V., Chicklore, S., Roy, A., Marsden, P., Ahmad, S., & Landau, D. (2013). Are Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Tumor Textural Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Associated with Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy? Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.107375
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.