Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Postreconstruction Harmonization Method for Multicenter Radiomic Studies in PET

Open access
Orlhac, Fanny, Boughdad, Sarah, Philippe, Cathy, Stalla-Bourdillon, Hugo, Nioche, Christophe, Champion, Laurence, Soussan, Michaël, Frouin, Frédérique, Frouin, Vincent, Buvat, Irène·2018·Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Abstract

Several reports have shown that radiomic features are affected by acquisition and reconstruction parameters, thus hampering multicenter studies. We propose a method that, by removing the center effect while preserving patient-specific effects, standardizes features measured from PET images obtained using different imaging protocols. Methods: Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET images of patients with breast cancer were included. In one nuclear medicine department (department A), 63 patients were scanned on a time-of-flight PET/CT scanner, and 16 lesions were triple-negative (TN). In another nuclear medicine department (department B), 74 patients underwent PET/CT on a different brand of scanner and a different reconstruction protocol, and 15 lesions were TN. The images from department A were smoothed using a gaussian filter to mimic data from a third department (department A-S). The primary lesion was segmented to obtain a lesion volume of interest (VOI), and a spheric VOI was set in healthy liver tissue. Three SUVs and 6 textural features were computed in all VOIs. A harmonization method initially described for genomic data was used to estimate the department effect based on the observed feature values. Feature distributions in each department were compared before and after harmonization. Results: In healthy liver tissue, the distributions significantly differed for 4 of 9 features between departments A and B and for 6 of 9 between departments A and A-S (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). After harmonization, none of the 9 feature distributions significantly differed between 2 departments (P > 0.1). The same trend was observed in lesions, with a realignment of feature distributions between the departments after harmonization. Identification of TN lesions was largely enhanced after harmonization when the cutoffs were determined on data from one department and applied to data from the other department. Conclusion: The proposed harmonization method is efficient at removing the multicenter effect for textural features and SUVs. The method is easy to use, retains biologic variations not related to a center effect, and does not require any feature recalculation. Such harmonization allows for multicenter studies and for external validation of radiomic models or cutoffs and should facilitate the use of radiomic models in clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2967/jnumed.117.199935

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 393

Metadata

Authors
Orlhac, F., Boughdad, S., Philippe, C., Stalla-Bourdillon, H., Nioche, C., Champion, L., Soussan, M., Frouin, F., Frouin, V., & Buvat, I.
Venue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2018-01-04
Volume
59
Issue
8
Pages
1321-1328
ISSN
  • 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-662X
OpenAlex
W2781993955
Cited by
393
References
5
FWCI
26.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Postreconstruction Harmonization Method for Multicenter Radiomic Studies in PET. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.117.199935
The paper
Orlhac, F., Boughdad, S., Philippe, C., Stalla-Bourdillon, H., Nioche, C., Champion, L., Soussan, M., Frouin, F., Frouin, V., & Buvat, I. (2018). A Postreconstruction Harmonization Method for Multicenter Radiomic Studies in PET. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.199935

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.