The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First-in-Humans Imaging with 89Zr-Df-IAB22M2C Anti-CD8 Minibody in Patients with Solid Malignancies: Preliminary Pharmacokinetics, Biodistribution, and Lesion Targeting
Open accessAbstract
Immunotherapy is becoming the mainstay for treatment of a variety of malignancies, but only a subset of patients responds to treatment. Tumor-infiltrating CD8-positive (CD8+) T lymphocytes play a central role in antitumor immune responses. Noninvasive imaging of CD8+ T cells may provide new insights into the mechanisms of immunotherapy and potentially predict treatment response. We are studying the safety and utility of 89Zr-IAB22M2C, a radiolabeled minibody against CD8+ T cells, for targeted imaging of CD8+ T cells in patients with cancer. Methods: The initial dose escalation phase of this first-in-humans prospective study included 6 patients (melanoma, 1; lung, 4; hepatocellular carcinoma, 1). Patients received approximately 111 MBq (3 mCi) of 89Zr-IAB22M2C (at minibody mass doses of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 5, or 10 mg) as a single dose, followed by PET/CT scans at approximately 1–2, 6–8, 24, 48, and 96–144 h after injection. Biodistribution in normal organs, lymph nodes, and lesions was evaluated. In addition, serum samples were obtained at approximately 5, 30, and 60 min and later at the times of imaging. Patients were monitored for safety during infusion and up to the last imaging time point. Results:89Zr-IAB22M2C infusion was well tolerated, with no immediate or delayed side effects observed after injection. Serum clearance was typically biexponential and dependent on the mass of minibody administered. Areas under the serum time–activity curve, normalized to administered activity, ranged from 1.3 h/L for 0.2 mg to 8.9 h/L for 10 mg. Biodistribution was dependent on the minibody mass administered. The highest uptake was always in spleen, followed by bone marrow. Liver uptake was more pronounced with higher minibody masses. Kidney uptake was typically low. Prominent uptake was seen in multiple normal lymph nodes as early as 2 h after injection, peaking by 24–48 h after injection. Uptake in tumor lesions was seen on imaging as early as 2 h after injection, with most 89Zr-IAB22M2C–positive lesions detectable by 24 h. Lesions were visualized early in patients receiving treatment, with SUV ranging from 5.85 to 22.8 in 6 target lesions. Conclusion:89Zr-IAB22M2C imaging is safe and has favorable kinetics for early imaging. Biodistribution suggests successful targeting of CD8+ T-cell–rich tissues. The observed targeting of tumor lesions suggests this may be informative for CD8+ T-cell accumulation within tumors. Further evaluation is under way.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PD-1 and PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade to Treat Breast Cancer
Hartkopf, A. D., Taran, F.-A., Wallwiener, M., Walter, C. B., Krämer, B., Grischke, E.-M., & Brucker, S. Y. (2016) · Breast Care · doi:10.1159/000453569 · Cited by 30,845
Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti–PD-1 antibody in cancer
Topalian, S. L., Hodi, F. S., Brahmer, J. R., Gettinger, S. N., Smith, D. C., McDermott, D. F., Powderly, J. D., Carvajal, R. D., Sosman, J. A., Atkins, M. B., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1200690 · Cited by 12,628
Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer
Brahmer, J. R., Tykodi, S. S., Chow, L. Q. M., Hwu, W.-J., Topalian, S. L., Hwu, P., Drake, C. G., Camacho, L. H., Kauh, J., Odunsi, K., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1200694 · Cited by 7,945 · cited 1×
“Although treatment with checkpoint inhibitors can be effective, responses are seen in only a subset of patients (6,7).”
BackgroundPD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance
Tumeh, P. C., Harview, C. L., Yearley, J. H., Shintaku, I. P., Taylor, E. J. M., Robert, L., Chmielowski, B., Spasic, M., Henry, G., Ciobanu, V., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13954 · Cited by 6,609 · cited 1×
“Tumor-infiltrating T cells (TIL) play a central role in this process (1) and, in particular, those composed of CD8+ T cells are important for initiating and mediating a response to CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PDL1 checkpoint inhibitors (2-5).”
BackgroundOncolytic virotherapy promotes intratumoral T cell infiltration and improves anti-PD-1 immunotherapy
Ribas, A., Dummer, R., Puzanov, I., VanderWalde, A., Andtbacka, R. H. I., Michielin, O., Olszanski, A. J., Malvehy, J., Cebon, J., Fernandez, E., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.027 · Cited by 1,520
Gooden, M. J. M., de Bock, G. H., Leffers, N., Daemen, T., & Nijman, H. W. (2011) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.189 · Cited by 1,277
Azimi, F., Scolyer, R. A., Rumcheva, P., Moncrieff, M., Murali, R., McCarthy, S. W., Saw, R. P., & Thompson, J. F. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.37.8539 · Cited by 856
89Zr-DFO-J591 for ImmunoPET of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression In Vivo
Holland, J. P., Divilov, V., Bander, N. H., Smith-Jones, P. M., Larson, S. M., & Lewis, J. S. (2010) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.110.076174 · Cited by 418
Self-citationStandardized methods for the production of high specific-activity zirconium-89
Holland, J. P., Sheh, Y., & Lewis, J. S. (2009) · Nuclear Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.05.007 · Cited by 408
Self-citationAn Effective Immuno-PET Imaging Method to Monitor CD8-Dependent Responses to Immunotherapy
Tavaré, R., Escuin-Ordinas, H., Mok, S., McCracken, M. N., Zettlitz, K. A., Salazar, F. B., Witte, O. N., Ribas, A., & Wu, A. M. (2016) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-1707 · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Cited by
Advances in PET imaging of cancer
Schwenck, J., Sonanini, D., Cotton, J. M., Rammensee, H.-G., la Fougère, C., Zender, L., & Pichler, B. J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-023-00576-4 · Cited by 312
Radiopharmaceuticals and their applications in medicine
Zhang, S., Wang, X., Gao, X., Chen, X., Li, L., Li, G., Liu, C., Miao, Y., Wang, R., & Hu, K. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-02041-6 · Cited by 284
Refining patient selection for breast cancer immunotherapy: beyond PD-L1
Kossai, M., Radosevic-Robin, N., & Penault-Llorca, F. (2021) · ESMO Open · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100257 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Pandit-Taskar, N., Postow, M. A., Hellmann, M. D., Harding, J. J., Barker, C. A., O’Donoghue, J. A., Ziolkowska, M., Ruan, S., Lyashchenko, S. K., Tsai, F., Farwell, M., Mitchell, T. C., Korn, R., Le, W., Lewis, J. S., Weber, W. A., Behera, D., Wilson, I., Gordon, M., Wu, A. M., & Wolchok, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2019-10-04
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 512-519
- ISSN
- 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-662X
- OpenAlex
- W2977430086
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 20.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First-in-Humans Imaging with 89Zr-Df-IAB22M2C Anti-CD8 Minibody in Patients with Solid Malignancies: Preliminary Pharmacokinetics, Biodistribution, and Lesion Targeting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.119.229781
- The paper
- Pandit-Taskar, N., Postow, M. A., Hellmann, M. D., Harding, J. J., Barker, C. A., O’Donoghue, J. A., Ziolkowska, M., Ruan, S., Lyashchenko, S. K., Tsai, F., Farwell, M., Mitchell, T. C., Korn, R., Le, W., Lewis, J. S., Weber, W. A., Behera, D., Wilson, I., Gordon, M., . . . Wolchok, J. D. (2020). First-in-Humans Imaging with 89Zr-Df-IAB22M2C Anti-CD8 Minibody in Patients with Solid Malignancies: Preliminary Pharmacokinetics, Biodistribution, and Lesion Targeting. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229781
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.