Cited by 91Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Combination Strategies to Improve Targeted Radionuclide Therapy

Open access
Chan, Tiffany G., O’Neill, Edward, Habjan, Christine, Cornelissen, Bart·2020·Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Abstract

In recent years, targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment. In contrast to conventional radiotherapy, TRT delivers ionizing radiation to tumors in a targeted manner, reducing the dose that healthy tissues are exposed to. Existing TRT strategies include the use of 177Lu-DOTATATE, 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine, Bexxar, and Zevalin, clinically approved agents for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors, neuroblastoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, respectively. Although promising results have been obtained with these agents, clinical evidence acquired to date suggests that only a small percentage of patients achieves complete response. Consequently, there have been attempts to improve TRT outcomes through combinations with other therapeutic agents; such strategies include administering concurrent TRT and chemotherapy, and the use of TRT with known or putative radiosensitizers such as poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase and mammalian-target-of-rapamycin inhibitors. In addition to potentially achieving greater therapeutic effects than the respective monotherapies, these strategies may lead to lower dosages or numbers of cycles required and, in turn, reduce unwanted toxicities. As of now, several clinical trials have been conducted to assess the benefits of TRT-based combination therapies, sometimes despite limited preclinical evidence being available in the public domain to support their use. Although some clinical trials have yielded promising results, others have shown no clear survival benefit from particular combination treatments. Here, we present a comprehensive review of combination strategies with TRT reported in the literature to date and evaluate their therapeutic potential.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2967/jnumed.120.248062

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 177Lu-DOTATATE capitalizes on somatostatin receptor overexpression on NET cells to deliver targeted radiation to tumor sites while minimizing damage to healthy tissues.

    “This approach capitalizes on somatostatin receptors’ overexpression on NET cells, delivering targeted radiation to tumor sites while minimizing damage to healthy tissues [92].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 107 · Cited by 91

Authors
Chan, T. G., O’Neill, E., Habjan, C., & Cornelissen, B.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Cornelissen, Bart
Venue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2020-10-09
Volume
61
Issue
11
Pages
1544-1552
ISSN
  • 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-662X
OpenAlex
W3086431826
Cited by
91
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 10
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (23970)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/P018661/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
targeted radionuclide therapy, combination therapy, combination chemotherapy, radiosensitizers, PARP inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, 177Lu-DOTATATE, 131I-MIBG, Bexxar, Zevalin, neuroendocrine tumors, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, neuroblastoma, treatment toxicity
MeSH terms
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Cell Cycle, Combined Modality Therapy, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, NAD, Neoplasms, Organometallic Compounds, Radiation-Sensitizing Agents, Octreotide, HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins, Hedgehog Proteins, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases, Topoisomerase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review