The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Revealing Whiteness: The Unconscious Habits of Racial Privilege
Abstract
A bold examination of questions about whiteness and race
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Shannon Sullivan (2006 ) and Charles Mills (2007 ) have revived similar arguments, detailing the ways in which white majorities in many contemporary societies retain an actively upheld ignorance of the lives of racialized minorities.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Sullivan (2006 )
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power
Herissone-Kelly, R. (2025) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqaf044 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Sullivan, S.
- Corresponding author
- Sullivan, Shannon
- Venue
- Indiana University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Indiana University Press
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W4409477109
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Indiana University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- whiteness, race, racial identity, racial ideology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
