Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Drifting Continents and Colliding Paradigms: Perspectives on the Geoscience Revolution

Stewart, John·1990

Abstract

"The book provides an excellent historical summary of the debates over continental drift theory in this century." -Contemporary Sociology"This is a useful discussion of the way that science works. The book will be of value to philosophers of science... " -Choice"... will find an important place in university and department libraries, and will interest afficionados of the factual and intellectual history of the earth sciences." -Terra Nova"... an excellent core analysis... " -The Times Higher Education Supplement"... an ambitious and important contribution to the new sociology of science." -American Journal of Sociology"... Stewart's book is a noble effort, an interesting and readable discussion, and another higher notch on the scoreboard of critical scholarship that deserves wide examination and close attention." -GeophysicsThis fascinating book describes the rise and fall and rebirth of continental drift theory in this century. It uses the recent revolution in geoscientinsts' beliefs about the earth to examine questions such as, How does scientific knowledge develop and change? The book also explores how well different perspectives help us to understand revolutionary change in science.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2979/576.0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Stewart, J.
Published
1990
Cited by
12
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.