The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Future of Artificial Intelligence in/and of Islam: A View from Muslim Southeast Asia
Abstract
The conference on “The Future of Artificial Intelligence in/and of Islam: A View from Muslim Southeast Asia” was held on July 2–4, 2024, at Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia (UIII). The conference was initiated by the Faculty of Islamic Studies UIII in collaboration with Project 0100 led by Bart Barendregt (Leiden University, the Netherlands). The conference aims to “explore the dynamic intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and Islam . . . [and] discuss the profound implications arising from the co-production of digital and religious futures.” Barendregt also asserted that Southeast Asia was selected as the focus of the conference since “Southeast Asia [does] not only [have] a significant Muslim population . . . it is also very much at the forefront of digital technologies interacting with them in everyday practices.” The conference covered three main programs: Keynote Speeches , Panel Sessions , and Masterclasses . This report focuses on the discussions in keynote speeches and exclusive panel sessions, with more detailed explanations dedicated to the keynote speeches. Masterclasses focused primarily on technical and practical engagement directly with the audience.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In Islamic epistemology, interpretive practices such as tafsīr, syarḥ, and sanad-matn reasoning function as institutionalized systems of validation that embed interpretation within chains of transmission, ethical discipline (adab), and communal accountability [15,31,3].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Ahmad, H., & Ghafar, N. A. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01254-5 · Cited by 3
“In Islamic epistemology, interpretive practices such as tafsīr, syarḥ , and sanad–matn reasoning function as institutionalized systems of validation that embed interpretation within chains of transmission, ethical discipline ( adab ), and communal accountability [15, 31, 3].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Anoraga, B.
- Corresponding author
- Anoraga, Bhirawa
- ORCID
- Anoraga, Bhirawa
- Venue
- Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies
- Publisher
- Indiana University Press
- Published
- 2024-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-123
- ISSN
- 2470-7066 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-7074
- OpenAlex
- W4403219941
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Media, Religion, Digital Communication
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, Islam, religion and technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Future of Artificial Intelligence in/and of Islam: A View from Muslim Southeast Asia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2979/jims.00031
- The paper
- Anoraga, B. (2024). The Future of Artificial Intelligence in/and of Islam: A View from Muslim Southeast Asia. Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies. https://doi.org/10.2979/jims.00031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
