Cited by 235Feminist Theory and Gender StudiesInternational Human Rights and Reproductive LawGender, Health, and Social Inequality

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What is Reproductive Justice? How Women of Color Activists Are Redefining the Pro-Choice Paradigm

Price, Kimala·2010·Meridians

Abstract

Frustrated by the individualist approach of the “choice” paradigm used by the mainstream reproductive rights movement in the U.S., a growing coalition of women of color organizations and their allies have sought to redefine and broaden the scope of reproductive rights by using a human rights framework. Dubbing itself “the movement for reproductive justice,” this coalition connects reproductive rights to other social justice issues such as economic justice, education, immigrant rights, environmental justice, sexual right, and globalization, and believes that this new framework will encourage more women of color and other marginalized groups to become more involved in the political movement for reproductive freedom. Using narrative analysis, this essay explores what reproductive justice means to this movement, while placing it within the political, social, and cultural context from which it emerged.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2979/meridians.2010.10.2.42

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.2307/3562509 · DOI
  2. 2002, Historical and Multicultural Encyclopedia of Women's Reproductive Rights in the United States
  3. 1995, Women's Rights, Human Rights: International Perspectives
  4. 2000, Using Women: Gender, Drug Policy, and Social Justice
  5. 2004, The Crisis, 111, 14
  6. 10.1016/1049-3867(95)00078-X · DOI
  7. 2001, Supreme Court Decisions and Women's Rights: Milestones to Equality
  8. 1998, A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies
  9. 2004, Narratives in Social Science Research
  10. 1983, Women, Race, & Class
  11. 10.2307/3525867 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/14759550215614 · DOI
  13. 2007, Walk in My Shoes: A Black Activist's Guide to Surviving the Women's Movement
  14. 2005, Colorlines, 7, 30
  15. 2003, Women of Color and the Reproductive Rights Movement
  16. 10.2307/3775786 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/2678623 · DOI
  18. PPFA.2005.“Reproductive Justice for All: A Policy Conference, Summary Report.”November10–13,2005, atSmith College,Northampton, MA.
  19. 1997, Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty
  20. 2006, Color of Violence: The Incite! Anthology
  21. 10.1353/hpu.2010.0241 · DOI
  22. 2001, American Journal of Health Studies Special Issue, 17, 79
  23. 1992, Norplant and Poor Women
  24. 2002, Policing the National Body: Race, Gender and Criminalization in the United States
  25. 2004, Undivided Rights: Women of Color Organize for Reproductive Justice
  26. SisterSong.2003.“SisterSong Reproductive Health and Sexual Rights National Conference Program Book.”Atlanta, GA:SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Health Collective.
  27. 10.2979/NWS.2005.17.1.119 · DOI
  28. 2005, Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide
  29. 1999, Still Lifting, Still Climbing: Contemporary African American Women's Activism
  30. 1991, The Pro-Choice Movement: Organization and Activism in The Abortion Conflict
  31. 10.2307/2151585 · DOI

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Price, K.
Corresponding author
Price, Kimala
Venue
Meridians
Published
2010-03-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
42-65
ISSN
  • 1536-6936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-8424
OpenAlex
W2084244701
Cited by
235
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Meridians (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
reproductive justice, women of color, reproductive rights movement, human rights framework, social justice, economic justice, immigrant rights, environmental justice, sexual rights, globalization, political activism, marginalized communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is Reproductive Justice? How Women of Color Activists Are Redefining the Pro-Choice Paradigm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2979/meridians.2010.10.2.42
The paper
Price, K. (2010). What is Reproductive Justice? How Women of Color Activists Are Redefining the Pro-Choice Paradigm. Meridians. https://doi.org/10.2979/meridians.2010.10.2.42