The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Music Teacher Education in Japan: Structure, Problems, and Perspectives
Abstract
Music Teacher Education in Japan:Structure, Problems, and Perspectives Masafumi Ogawa School music education in Japan is in a less than ideal situation. In April 2002, the new course of study was implemented by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT).1 The total number of music classes in the new curriculum was reduced to 33% of what it had been by the end of 2002. The reduction went from two hours of music classes every week in grades one through nine to one hour in grades five through nine. This inevitably caused many problems. First, it became very difficult to teach music sequentially and instead music classes tended to be fragments of introductory experiences taught as disconnected activities. In this situation, it has been difficult for students to develop musical knowledge and skills. Second, the number of full-time music teachers was reduced greatly. It became common for a music teacher to teach at more than two schools in order to fill a full-time assignment. In some scenarios, many full-time music teachers were replaced with part-time teachers or teachers of other subjects. Music teachers have become disposable. Many music teachers are losing their effectiveness in the classroom. Students consider school music classes as a time to relax compared with other "intellectual subjects."2 They sometimes question music as an essential subject because they [End Page 139] do not value the developing skills that music requires or studying the…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The recent implementation of this ambitious goal in April 2002 has been awkward and seems premature due to the lack of teacher training in traditional music that has led schools to bring in professionals or find workshops in traditional music (Ogawa 2004:147).”
From Okeikoba: Lesson Places as Sites for Negotiating Tradition in Japanese Music (2008) · cites this paper as Ogawa 2004:147
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Ogawa Masafumi, 2002, Studies in Curriculum Research and Development, 20, 248
- Junior High The Course, 1988, and Science, 60
- Parr Carlotta, 1999, Philosophy of Music Education Review, 7, 56
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Okeikoba: Lesson Places as Sites for Negotiating Tradition in Japanese Music
Keister, J. (2008) · Ethnomusicology · doi:10.2307/20174588 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Ogawa, M.
- Corresponding author
- Ogawa, Masafumi
- ORCID
- Ogawa, Masafumi
- Venue
- Philosophy of Music Education Review
- Publisher
- Indiana University Press
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-153
- ISSN
- 1063-5734 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-3412
- OpenAlex
- W2032433574
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophy of Music Education Review (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
- Keywords
- music teacher education, school music education, Japanese music education, music teacher shortage, student attitudes toward music, classroom management, music education policy, history of music education, music education reform, Japan, teacher-student relationship, music theory teaching, music education standards, American music education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review