Cited by 10Diverse Music Education InsightsMusic Education and AnalysisArt Education and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Music Teacher Education in Japan: Structure, Problems, and Perspectives

Ogawa, Masafumi·2004·Philosophy of Music Education Review

Abstract

Music Teacher Education in Japan:Structure, Problems, and Perspectives Masafumi Ogawa School music education in Japan is in a less than ideal situation. In April 2002, the new course of study was implemented by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT).1 The total number of music classes in the new curriculum was reduced to 33% of what it had been by the end of 2002. The reduction went from two hours of music classes every week in grades one through nine to one hour in grades five through nine. This inevitably caused many problems. First, it became very difficult to teach music sequentially and instead music classes tended to be fragments of introductory experiences taught as disconnected activities. In this situation, it has been difficult for students to develop musical knowledge and skills. Second, the number of full-time music teachers was reduced greatly. It became common for a music teacher to teach at more than two schools in order to fill a full-time assignment. In some scenarios, many full-time music teachers were replaced with part-time teachers or teachers of other subjects. Music teachers have become disposable. Many music teachers are losing their effectiveness in the classroom. Students consider school music classes as a time to relax compared with other "intellectual subjects."2 They sometimes question music as an essential subject because they [End Page 139] do not value the developing skills that music requires or studying the…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2979/pme.2004.12.2.139

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ogawa Masafumi, 2002, Studies in Curriculum Research and Development, 20, 248
  2. Junior High The Course, 1988, and Science, 60
  3. Parr Carlotta, 1999, Philosophy of Music Education Review, 7, 56

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Ogawa, M.
Corresponding author
Ogawa, Masafumi
Venue
Philosophy of Music Education Review
Published
2004-10
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
139-153
ISSN
  • 1063-5734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-3412
OpenAlex
W2032433574
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Philosophy of Music Education Review (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
Keywords
music teacher education, school music education, Japanese music education, music teacher shortage, student attitudes toward music, classroom management, music education policy, history of music education, music education reform, Japan, teacher-student relationship, music theory teaching, music education standards, American music education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review