Investigating the potential for saltpan restoration for the provision of multiple ecosystem services
Open accessAbstract
Saltpans are increasingly being abandoned around the world, leading to the loss of ecosystem services provided by these unique semi-natural wetlands. The desertion of a saltpan at the Swartkops Estuary, South Africa has left behind a large area of desiccated hypersaline sediment and a sharp decrease in waterbird abundance and diversity. Here, we explore the potential for restoring this saltpan’s wetland function using stormwater inflow to support multiple ecosystem services and improve estuary health. Stormwater will be able to flow into the saltpan as a passive restoration approach that can maintain the site as a wetland habitat. This will contribute to improving the health of a nationally important, yet highly degraded, estuary by retaining 758 ML of stormwater to achieve full capacity, containing an estimated 2908 kg of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and 68 kg of dissolved inorganic nitrogen. Additional ecosystem services such as biodiversity maintenance, carbon storage and societal values can be expected. However, this would create a novel hypersaline stormwater wetland and a strategic adaptive management approach will be required. Management must be guided by monitoring, which should comprise collection of basic environmental data to establish a baseline condition, and against which, long term changes and responses resulting from stochastic events can be assessed and mitigated through the use of achievable ecological restoration targets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much of the vulnerability of townships and informal settlements in the NMBM can be attributed to the legacies of Apartheid that saw townships inherit dilapidating infrastructure and weakened social and economic conditions.
“Much of this can be attributed to the legacies of Apartheid that saw townships inherit dilapidating infrastructure and weakened social and economic conditions (Wasserman et al. 2022).”
From Flood vulnerability in township informal settlements (2026) · cites this paper as Wasserman et al. 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Flood vulnerability in township informal settlements
Gcabashe, S. W., & Pillay, S. (2026) · Jàmbá Journal of Disaster Risk Studies · doi:10.4102/jamba.v18i1.1833 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Much of this can be attributed to the legacies of Apartheid that saw townships inherit dilapidating infrastructure and weakened social and economic conditions (Wasserman et al. 2022).”
- Authors
- Wasserman, J., Adams, J. B., & Lemley, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Wasserman, Johan
- Venue
- African Journal of Aquatic Science
- Published
- 2022-06-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 436-446
- ISSN
- 1608-5914 (ISSN-L)
- 1727-9364
- OpenAlex
- W4281623822
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- African Journal of Aquatic Science (publishedVersion)
- Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation (120709)
- Nelson Mandela University
- DSI/NRF Research Chair in Shallow Water Ecosystems
- Water Research Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Wetland Management and Conservation
- Keywords
- stormwater inflow, passive restoration, ecosystem services, waterbirds, Swartkops Estuary, estuary health, nitrogen retention, carbon storage, adaptive management, wetland desiccation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review