Cited by 10Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesWetland Management and Conservation

Investigating the potential for saltpan restoration for the provision of multiple ecosystem services

Open access
Wasserman, Johan, Adams, Janine B, Lemley, Daniel A·2022·African Journal of Aquatic Science

Abstract

Saltpans are increasingly being abandoned around the world, leading to the loss of ecosystem services provided by these unique semi-natural wetlands. The desertion of a saltpan at the Swartkops Estuary, South Africa has left behind a large area of desiccated hypersaline sediment and a sharp decrease in waterbird abundance and diversity. Here, we explore the potential for restoring this saltpan’s wetland function using stormwater inflow to support multiple ecosystem services and improve estuary health. Stormwater will be able to flow into the saltpan as a passive restoration approach that can maintain the site as a wetland habitat. This will contribute to improving the health of a nationally important, yet highly degraded, estuary by retaining 758 ML of stormwater to achieve full capacity, containing an estimated 2908 kg of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and 68 kg of dissolved inorganic nitrogen. Additional ecosystem services such as biodiversity maintenance, carbon storage and societal values can be expected. However, this would create a novel hypersaline stormwater wetland and a strategic adaptive management approach will be required. Management must be guided by monitoring, which should comprise collection of basic environmental data to establish a baseline condition, and against which, long term changes and responses resulting from stochastic events can be assessed and mitigated through the use of achievable ecological restoration targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2989/16085914.2022.2067823

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much of the vulnerability of townships and informal settlements in the NMBM can be attributed to the legacies of Apartheid that saw townships inherit dilapidating infrastructure and weakened social and economic conditions.

    “Much of this can be attributed to the legacies of Apartheid that saw townships inherit dilapidating infrastructure and weakened social and economic conditions (Wasserman et al. 2022).”

    From Flood vulnerability in township informal settlements (2026) · cites this paper as Wasserman et al. 2022

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wasserman, J., Adams, J. B., & Lemley, D. A.
Affiliations
Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Wasserman, Johan
Venue
African Journal of Aquatic Science
Published
2022-06-07
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
436-446
ISSN
  • 1608-5914 (ISSN-L)
  • 1727-9364
OpenAlex
W4281623822
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • African Journal of Aquatic Science (publishedVersion)
  • Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation (120709)
  • Nelson Mandela University
  • DSI/NRF Research Chair in Shallow Water Ecosystems
  • Water Research Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Wetland Management and Conservation
Keywords
stormwater inflow, passive restoration, ecosystem services, waterbirds, Swartkops Estuary, estuary health, nitrogen retention, carbon storage, adaptive management, wetland desiccation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review