The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Privacy-Preserving Attribute-Based Educational Service Recommendation in Online Education System
Open accessAbstract
Educational service recommendation has attracted considerable attention since it can solve complicated educational tasks by gathering the wisdom of a crowd of teachers in recent years.In the education service recommendation system, parent (student) can send requirements to the education platform, and get a suitable teacher recommended.In the existing education service recommendation schemes, although parent (student) can send the basic requirements to get education service recommendations, they cannot set personalized requirements to obtain personalized education services.In addition, teacher' ability or credibility has not been concerned, and the privacy-preserving of tasks and task recipients have also been ignored.To address the above problems, this article proposes a privacy-preserving attribute-based education service recommendation scheme, which realizes fine-grained access control and keywords search for education services by using attribute-based searchable encryption (ABKS).Then, the anonymous key generation method is adopted, in which the attribute authority and the teacher interact to generate the key to ensure the security of the teacher's key.Besides, education platform can choose the best teacher to accept the task by evaluation mechanism.The security proof and performance analysis show that the scheme has strong security and practicality in the online education system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Among them, CP-ABE is extensively used in PPRS with other encryption techniques such as search encryption or secret sharing due to the continuous information exchange nature of RS to acquire necessary services [154-156].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [154]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roy, F., Ding, X., Choo, K. K. R., & Zhou, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12651 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Huan, L., Liu, X., Sun, R., & Li, L.
- Affiliations
- Northwest Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Huan, Lijuan
- Venue
- Advances in Computer Science Research
- Publisher
- Atlantis Press
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2352-538X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4318474301
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.14
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Advances in computer science research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62262060, 2022CYZC-17, 61662071)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Access Control and Trust
- Keywords
- privacy preservation, attribute-based searchable encryption, attribute-based encryption, online education system, teacher recommendations, fine-grained access control, keyword search, teacher credibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review