The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis on the Ethics of Modern Network Technology from the Perspective of Marxism Ethical Thought
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This can leave individuals in a moral vacuum, where they may engage in online offences without fully recognising or respecting the consequences (Hu & Zhou, 2013).”
From Virtual Reality Risks for Children in the Metaverse: An Examination through Criminological Perspectives (2026) · cites this paper as Hu & Zhou, 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Li Zhengjun. Preliminary Study of Contemporary College Students on Network Ethics Problem [J]. Lingling College Journal Eeducstion Science). 2004, (6).
- Malkovich. About Argument of Marx Socialism Humanitarian [M]. Dai Maochang, Trans. Shanghai: Shanghai press, 1981:28.
- Nigeluo • Ponti. Being digital [M]. Fan Haiyan, trans. Haikou: Hainan Press, 1998:14.
- Ke Changqin, Shen Haibo. The Network Ethics Problem and Countermeasure [J]. Hubei Education Institute Journal. 2005, (3).
Cited by
Martellozzo, E., Bradbury, P., Farr, R., & Davidson, J. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009620161 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, Z., & Zhou, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2013 the International Conference on Education Technology and Information Systems
- Publisher
- Atlantis Press
- Published
- 2013
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis on the Ethics of Modern Network Technology from the Perspective of Marxism Ethical Thought. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2991/icetis-13.2013.109
- The paper
- Hu, Z., & Zhou, D. (2013). Analysis on the Ethics of Modern Network Technology from the Perspective of Marxism Ethical Thought. Proceedings of the 2013 the International Conference on Education Technology and Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.2991/icetis-13.2013.109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
