Cited by 8COVID-19 diagnosis using AIRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Applicability of Various Pre-Trained Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Pneumonia Classification based on X-Ray Images

Young, Julio Christian·2020·International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering

Abstract

Along with the development of machine learning methodologies, in the last few decades, a variety of machine learning techniques began to solve many problems in various fields. Encouraged by the development of computer hardware technology, deep learning has become one of machine learning methods that have become incredibly attractive due to the performance of such methods. By using deep learning, the researchers managed to find solutions to a variety of complex problems that had not yet had an optimal solution. In the field of bioinformatics and computer-aided diagnosis, previous researches show that deep learning can be utilized to predict the structure of protein compounds, detecting lumbar spinal stenosis regions, or other biomedical related prediction problems. In this study, we are experimenting with various pre-trained deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) architectures, namely, densely connected convolutional networks (DenseNet), VGG-16, Inception, and Inception-ResNet, to build another classifier on top of before-mentioned pre-trained models for classify each patient condition based on their chest X-Ray images. In this study, our resulted model needs to able to predict whether a patient’s lungs have a normal condition or have contracted either with viral or bacterial pneumonia-related conditions based on the given chest X-Ray image. Our experiment shows that by using a variation of DenseNet, DenseNet201,deep CNN is able to achieve the accuracy scores of 93.87% for the training data and 82.7% for the validation data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30534/ijatcse/2020/24932020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Starting from a pre-trained model leads to faster convergence.

    “The public initial model was used to initialize the FL training, instead of a randomly generated initialization, as starting from a pre-trained model leads to faster convergence41.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 8

Authors
Young, J. C.
Corresponding author
Young, Julio Christian
Venue
International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering
Published
2020-06-25
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
2649-2654
ISSN
2278-3091 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3040120150
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
pneumonia classification, chest X-ray images, pre-trained convolutional neural networks, DenseNet201, VGG16, Inception, Inception-ResNet, viral pneumonia, bacterial pneumonia, transfer learning, computer-aided diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review