The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Digital Financial Literacy on Older Households' Pension Financial Asset Allocation—Evidence from China
Abstract
With the population aging, the importance of pension finance has become increasingly prominent. However, Chinese elderly households' participation in the pension finance market is relatively low, with a single asset allocation structure. Based on data from the China Household Finance Survey, this paper examines the impact of digital financial literacy on the allocation of Pension financial assets of elderly households. The study found that increased digital financial literacy significantly promotes older households' participation in the pension finance market, allocation of commercial pension insurance, and a more diversified portfolio of financial assets. In addition, digital financial literacy influences older households' pension financial asset allocation behavior by increasing their financial accessibility and enhancing social interactions. The study also found that digital financial literacy contributes more strongly to allocating financial assets for retirement in older urban households.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, C.
- Venue
- Risk and Financial Management
- Publisher
- Ideas Spread
- Published
- 2025-05-26
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- p89
- ISSN
- 2690-9804
- 2690-9790
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
