The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barriers to digital participation in developing countries: Identifying technological, social, and cultural obstacles to community involvement
Open accessAbstract
Digital technologies hold significant promise for fostering inclusive development in low- and middle-income countries, yet many communities remain excluded due to persistent barriers to digital participation. This study investigates the technological, social, and cultural obstacles that prevent equitable access and engagement with digital tools. Key technological barriers include inadequate internet infrastructure, high costs of connectivity and devices, and unreliable electricity, which collectively hinder digital inclusion in rural and underserved areas. Social inequalities such as gender disparities, low income, advanced age, and disability further exacerbate exclusion, while cultural factors—including mistrust in digital systems, language barriers, and limited digital literacy—discourage meaningful engagement. Drawing on a review of relevant literature and case studies, the study finds that these barriers are often interlinked, creating a cycle of digital marginalization. Even where access is available, low usage rates are attributed to the lack of locally relevant content and support structures. The findings highlight that addressing digital exclusion requires more than infrastructure investment; it demands inclusive design, culturally appropriate digital education, and active collaboration among governments, civil society, and private actors. Ultimately, this research emphasizes that closing the digital divide is critical not only for individual empowerment but also for the broader goals of sustainable and equitable development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The obstacles that have been reported in the region are unreliable power supply, poor internet connectivity, high cost of procurement and maintenance, lack of training and digital literacy, resistance to change and fracturing of policy frameworks [13].”
From Cloud-based Electronic Health Records (EHR) Adoption Rate in Nigeria: Barriers and Performance Bottlenecks (2026) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mobile Phones and Economic Development in Africa
Aker, J. C., & Mbiti, I. M. (2010) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.24.3.207 · Cited by 2,216
The digital divide shifts to differences in usage
van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2014) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444813487959 · Cited by 1,733 · cited 1×
“In the absence of these skills, individuals are more susceptible to misinformation, cybercrime, and online exploitation (Van Deursen & Van Dijk, 2014).”
World Development Report 2021: Data for Better Lives
Bank, W. (2021) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1600-0 · Cited by 598
Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education
Carney, S. (2022) · Comparative Education · doi:10.1080/03050068.2022.2102326 · Cited by 536
The Digital Disconnect: The Social Causes and Consequences of Digital Inequalities
Helsper, E. (2021) · doi:10.4135/9781526492982 · Cited by 515 · cited 1×
“If individuals are not equipped with the skills to critically engage with technology, they remain passive consumers rather than active participants in the digital ecosystem (Helsper, 2020) .”
Blommaert, J., & Verschueren, J. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203029275 · Cited by 446
Hilbert, M. (2020) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2020.22.2/mhilbert · Cited by 275
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Crawford, J., & Evans, R. (n.d.). Beyond the school gates: The influence of place on educational outcomes. British Educational Research Journal, 1102.
- Cruz, S., Silva, E., & Rodríguez, D. (2019). Community networks: Telecommunications from the people for the people. . Journal of Community Informatics.
- Donovan, K. P., & Martin, A. (2022). Digital trust and state surveillance in the global South: Challenges and responses. Oxford Internet Institute.
- Elmi, A. (2021). Barriers to women's access to digital spaces in conflict-affected countries: The case of Afghanistan. International Gender Studies Journal, 44-60.
- Hussain, F., Malik, M. N., & Ahmad, S. (2019). Geographic and infrastructural challenges in internet connectivity for rural communities. Journal of Rural Development and Administration, 112-125.
- Jensen, M. (2019). Barriers to digital inclusion in developing countries: A review of the evidence. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
- Mohanty, C. T. (2020). Decolonizing knowledge: Reflections on global feminism and the politics of location. Duke University Press.
- Rathore, A. (2020). Digital culture and the resistance to change: Case studies from rural India. In R. D. Sharma, echnology and rural development in the Global South (pp. 112-130). Routledge.
- Sengupta, D., & Kaur, R. (2020). Digital empowerment of rural women in India: Case studies. Journal of Rural Development, 591-607.
Cited by
Obi, L. I., Osuizugbo, I. C., & Awuzie, B. O. (2025) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106406 · Cited by 34
Tan, Y.-C., Yang, L.-H., & Wang, B. (2026) · npj Heritage Science · doi:10.1038/s40494-026-02458-y · Cited by 29
Barriers to digital health implementation in low- and middle-income countries: a narrative review
Olayiwola, Q. B., Sanusi, O. M., Amoo, G. S., Agboola, O. J., Adeyemi, J. A., Suleiman, H. A., Ibrahim, M. A., & Hassan, T. A. (2026) · Discover Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12982-026-01875-5 · Cited by 28
Assessment of Digital Skills and Training in Somali Government Institutions.
Hussein, A., & Sharif, A. M. (2025) · Horn of Africa Journal of Social Science · doi:10.70806/jkhtfx87 · Cited by 7
Aposika, F. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01306-2 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Nirmani, I. A. P.
- Venue
- GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
- Publisher
- GSC Online Press
- Published
- 2025-05-30
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 061-071
- ISSN
- 2582-4597 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4410730063
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 38.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- GSC Advanced Research and Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › ICT Impact and Policies
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
- Keywords
- digital participation, digital divide, digital inclusion, developing countries, internet infrastructure, electricity reliability, social inequality, gender digital divide, disability, digital literacy, language barriers, inclusive design, digital education, rural communities, low- and middle-income countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barriers to digital participation in developing countries: Identifying technological, social, and cultural obstacles to community involvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.30574/gscarr.2025.23.2.0130
- The paper
- Nirmani, I. A. P. (2025). Barriers to digital participation in developing countries: Identifying technological, social, and cultural obstacles to community involvement. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2025.23.2.0130
