Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

STRENGTHENING CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RESILIENCE IN THE UNITED STATES: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF STRATEGIES FOR COUNTERING POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND EXTREMIST THREATS

Popoola, Juliana·2026·Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews

Abstract

Domestic violent extremists and state-sponsored actors’ intent on disrupting democratic processes and institutions through targeted attacks on critical infrastructure, including energy, water, communications, and nuclear power plants, are an increasingly diversified and growing threat in the United States. Whilst the number of documented plots targeting infrastructure has increased since 2016, the literature is still divided into sectors of threat-specific, technical and policy studies, without an integrated synthesis that examines how threat intelligence, technical hardening, governance and community-based approaches interact in determining infrastructure resilience outcomes in the United States. This review identified and compiled peer reviewed academic papers and institutional publications from 2020 to 2026 from various databases and was thematized according to four domains; the changing threat landscape and radicalization pathways, cyber-physical security and technical hardening, governance and policy frameworks, and community and communication-based resilience strategies. The review concludes that no single intervention can ensure long-term resilience, but rather a thoughtful combination of technical, governance, and human-based strategies and also, fragmentation among federal, state, private-sector, and community groups is a key vulnerability. A multi-layered approach that includes technical hardening and human-centered prevention, is best coordinated, most defensible, and has a unified evidence base for policy design and future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30574/msarr.2026.18.1.0182

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Adewumi, G., Dada, S., Azai, J. S., & Oware, E. (2024). A systematic review of strategies for enhancing pharmaceutical supply chain resilience in the US. International Medical Science Research Journal, 4(11), 961-972. · DOI
  2. https://doi.org/10.51594/imsrj.v4i11.1711 · DOI
  3. Bilazarian, T. (2020). Countering violent extremist narratives online: Lessons from offline countering violent extremism. Policy & Internet, 12(1), 46-65. · DOI
  4. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.204 · DOI
  5. Bonsu, J. O., & Adeoye, M. B. (2025). AI-driven fault detection and diagnostics in nuclear power plant control systems: A review. Journal of Engineering and Computer Sciences, 4(9), 552-559.
  6. Broughton, J. R. (2026). Threats and political violence. Nevada Law Journal, 26(3), 685.
  7. Doxsee, C. (2023). The heightened threat of US domestic terrorism. In Routledge handbook of transnational terrorism (pp. 197-207). Routledge. · DOI
  8. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003326373-23 · DOI
  9. Humpal, J. (2026). From earth liberation to accelerationism: A high-level review of fifty years of domestic infrastructure terrorism. CTC Sentinel, 19(3), 26-34.
  10. Lo Piano, S. (2020). Ethical principles in machine learning and artificial intelligence: Cases from the field and possible ways forward. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 9. · DOI · Paper page
  11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0501-9 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Nabila, M. H., & Djokoto, N. K. (2025). Narratives that build nations: Storytelling as a strategic tool against disinformation in the United States. Journal of Education and Sociology, 4(10), 29-37.
  13. Nabila, M. H., & Thompson, M. (2025a). Countering foreign influence: The role of strategic communications in national security policy making in the United States. Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(9), 22-30.
  14. Nabila, M. H., & Thompson, M. (2025b). The impact of disinformation on national security policymaking: A review. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 11(6), 1893-1894.
  15. Panful, B., Apaflo, B., & Hutchful, N. (2025). Cyber-physical systems under threat: A case-study review of recent SCADA attacks in the US utility sector. Journal of Engineering and Computer Sciences, 4(12), 104-117.
  16. Rajendran, R. M., & Vyas, B. (2023). Cyber security threat and its prevention through artificial intelligence technology. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(6), 1-18. · DOI
  17. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.10956 · DOI
  18. Silverman, D., Kent, D., & Gelpi, C. (2022). Putting terror in its place: An experiment on mitigating fears of terrorism among the American public. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 66(2), 191-216. · DOI
  19. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027211036935 · DOI
  20. Skjelsbæk, I., Hansen, J. M., & Lorentzen, J. (2020). Hopes and misguided expectations: How policy documents frame gender in efforts at preventing terrorism and violent extremism. Politics, Religion & Ideology, 21(4), 469-486. · DOI
  21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2020.1851873 · DOI
  22. Suleiman, A. M., & Donkor, A. A. (2025). Strengthening homeland security preparedness against adversarial use of generative AI in the United States: A scoping review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 28(2), 1169-1175. · DOI
  23. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.2.3658 · DOI
  24. Val, O. O., Kolade, T. M., Gbadebo, M. O., Selesi-Aina, O., Olateju, O. O., & Olaniyi, O. O. (2024). Strengthening cybersecurity measures for the defense of critical infrastructure in the United States. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, 17(11), 25-45. · DOI
  25. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2024/v17i11517 · DOI
  26. Zografopoulos, I., Ospina, J., Liu, X., & Konstantinou, C. (2021). Cyber-physical energy systems security: Threat modeling, risk assessment, resources, metrics, and case studies. IEEE Access, 9, 29775-29818. · DOI
  27. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058403 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Popoola, J.
Venue
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews
Published
2026-10-31
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
145
ISSN
2582-9394
Cited by
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review