Cited by 1Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityMedicinal Plant ResearchPhytochemicals and Medicinal Plants

Development and evaluation of natural polyherbal soap

Open access
Jagadish. Shivarai. Kudachi, Rohan Prakash Sawant, Shital. Pundalik. Khavare, Mahantesh Girimall. Kunchanur·2025·World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences

Abstract

This research focuses on the formulation of polyherbal soaps using natural ingredients such as neem, aloe vera, shikakai, rose water, and Multani mitti. The primary objective was to develop an eco-friendly, skin-beneficial soap with antibacterial, antioxidant, and skin-conditioning properties, as opposed to synthetic soaps containing harsh chemicals. The soap base was formulated using a cold process method, incorporating key ingredients at varying concentrations, such as neem oil (Azadirachta indica), aloe vera gel (Aloe barbadensis), and others, to enhance the soap’s effectiveness in treating skin issues. The study evaluates the prepared polyherbal soap formulations (F1, F2, F3, F4) based on organoleptic characters, pH, foam height, foam retention, irritation, and antimicrobial activity. The results showed that all formulations exhibited desirable attributes such as a pleasant fragrance, good lather, and no irritation upon skin application. The pH remained stable at 9 across all formulations, and antimicrobial activity was observed, with the F4 formulation demonstrating the highest inhibition zone (14mm) against E. coli. The findings suggest that polyherbal soaps possess superior therapeutic properties compared to conventional synthetic soaps, offering benefits such as enhanced skin hydration, acne control, and protection against infections. These formulations are considered promising for inclusion in skincare regimens, with minimal chemical content and more holistic benefits. Further clinical studies are recommended to validate these results and explore the broader potential of polyherbal soaps in skincare applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30574/wjbphs.2025.21.3.0225

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kudachi, J. S., Sawant, R. P., Khavare, S. P., & Kunchanur, M. G.
Affiliations
KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Jagadish. Shivarai. Kudachi
Venue
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Published
2025-03-30
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
040-046
ISSN
2582-5542 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408131911
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
Keywords
natural soap formulation, cold process soap making, neem oil, Aloe vera gel, shikakai, rose water, multani mitti, antibacterial activity, Escherichia coli, skin care, foam quality, skin irritation, pH, sustainable cosmetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review