Cited by 2Religious Studies and Spiritual PracticesReligion and Society InteractionsStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Soft charisma as an impediment to fundamentalist discourse: The case of the Anthroposophical Society in Sweden

Open access
Swartz, Karen, Hammer, Olav·2022·Approaching Religion

Abstract

The Anthroposophical Society in Sweden is, in the view of many of its members, going through tough times. Times of crisis and the search for a collective identity often inspire the formation of ideological rifts within a larger religious community. One way of responding to challenges is by turning to doctrines and texts stemming from a purportedly pristine past for guidance – in other words, by developing a fundamentalist discourse. A striking fact about the Anthroposophical Society, in Sweden as well as internationally, is that such returns to a set of canonical texts by the founder of the movement appear to be self-defeating. There are deeply rooted structural features within the Anthroposophical Society as an institution that impede any one voice from gaining significant traction and imposing a collective identity upon the movement. This article uses the example of the Anthroposophical Society in Sweden and the conundrum it repeatedly faces when addressing a perceived crisis in order to formulate a model of charismatic leadership that more generally accounts for the lack of success of fundamentalist discourses in religious movements with certain types of organisational culture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30664/ar.113383

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From an external perspective, it is more reasonable to treat Anthroposophy as a form of religious belief rather than a science.

    “However, due to its reliance on clairvoyant methods and the centrality of reincarnation and spiritual beings in its teachings, it is more reasonable from an external perspective to treat it as a form of religious belief”

    From Anthroposophy and Racism (2025) · cites this paper as Swartz and Hammer 2022: 19n

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Almond, Gabriel A., R. Scott Appleby, and Emmanuel Sivan. 2003. Strong Religion: The Rise of Fundamentalisms around the World (Chicago University Press). Anonymous. 1975. 'Nordiskt ungdomssemi- narium för antroposofi, sommarkurs 1975' (Järna: Rudolf Steiner Seminariet). Anonymous. 2009. ' "Info" november 2009' , Forum för antroposofi 3: 46-7. Anonymous. 2018. 'Julkonferens på Goethe- anum' , Forum Antroposofi 4: 21.
  2. Bromley, David G. 2012. 'The sociology of new religious movements' , in Cambridge Com- panion to New Religious Movements, eds. Olav Hammer and Mikael Rothstein (Cam- bridge University Press), 13-28.
  3. Campbell, Bruce. 1980. Ancient History Revived: A History of the Theosophical Movement (Berkeley: University of California Press).
  4. James R. Lewis and Jesper Aagaard Petersen, (New York: Oxford University Press), 227-58.
  5. Godwin, Joscelyn. 1994. The Theosophical Enlightenment (Albany, NY: SUNY Press).
  6. Marsden, George M. 2006. Fundamentalism and American Culture, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press).
  7. Marty, Martin E., and R. Scott Appleby 1991- 5. The Fundamentalism Project, 5 vols. (The University of Chicago Press).
  8. Owen, Alex. 2004. The Place of Enchantment: British Occultism and the Culture of the Modern (The University of Chicago Press).
  9. Poller, Jake. 2017. ' "Under a glamour": Annie Besant, Charles Leadbeater and neo- Theosophy ' , in The Occult Imagination in Britain 1875-1947, eds. Christine Ferguson and Andrew Radford (London and New York: Routledge), 77-93.
  10. Rothstein, Mikael. 2007. 'Scientology, scrip- ture, and sacred tradition' , in The Inven- tion of Sacred Tradition, eds. Olav Hammer and James R. Lewis (Cambridge University Press), 18-37.
  11. Rothstein, Mikael. 2014. 'Emblematic architec- ture and the routinization of charisma in Scientology' , International Journal for the Study of New Religions 5: 51-75.
  12. Rudolf Steiner Archive 2021-2. 'The Christ- mas Conference (GA 260)' , Rudolf Steiner Archive [website], <https:// rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA260/English/ AP1990/19240101p01.html?msclkid=4d07 8a50ceac11eca6b51c5f67ecf909>.
  13. Taves, Ann, and Steven C. Harper. 2016. 'Joseph Smith's first vision: new methods for the analysis of experience-related texts' , Mor- mon Studies Review 3: 53-84.
  14. Tillett, Gregory. 1986. 'Charles Webster Leadbeater 1854-1934: a biographical study' , Ph.D. dissertation (University of Sydney ), <https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/ handle/2123/1623>.
  15. Weber, Max. 1968. On Charisma and Institution Building (The University of Chicago Press).
  16. Weber, Max. 1991 (1948). 'The social psychol- ogy of the world religions' , From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, eds. H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (London and New York: Routledge), 267-301.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Swartz, K., & Hammer, O.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Venue
Approaching Religion
Published
2022-06-14
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
18-37
ISSN
1799-3121 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283458898
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Approaching Religion (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Doria (University of Helsinki) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
charismatic leadership, religious fundamentalism, organizational culture, religious movements, collective identity, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review