CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLymphadenopathy Diagnosis and AnalysisIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Evaluation of Cell Block Method and Smear Cytology in Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Intra-abdominal Mass Lesions.

Open access
Sourav Bhowmik, Indranil Chakrabarti, Piyali Ghosh, Pranati Bera, Tarak Banik·2018·Iranian Journal of Pathology
DOI 10.30699/ijp.13.2.179PMC PMC6339483
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is an easy, rapid, and less hazardous tool to diagnose the intra-abdominal lesions with various imaging modalities adding to its sensitivity and accuracy. However, sometimes it does not yield adequate information for precise diagnosis and the risk of false-negative and indeterminate diagnosis is always present. Cellblock preparations may be particularly helpful in such problematic cases. The current study aimed atevaluating and comparing the cytological as well as histopathological features of different intra-abdominal mass lesions. METHODS: Image-guided FNAC followed by cell block were performed on 167 patients from June 2012 to May 2013. Histologically correlated 111 cases were evaluated. Results of conventional smear, cell block, and combination of FNAC with cell block were compared with histopathological findings regarding diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnosis. RESULTS: Cell block was more specific to diagnose these lesions than FNAC (95.49% versus 90.09%). Combined application of cell block with FNAC was more specific (96.39%) than cell block alone with 100% diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: Application of a combination of cell block with FNAC was more useful to diagnose intra-abdominal mass lesions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30699/ijp.13.2.179

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure1 Microphotograph showing (A) Aspirate of epithelioid cell granuloma in tubercular lymphadenitis (L-Gstain,400X); inset showing numerous AFB (Z-N stain,1000X); (B) Epithelioid cell granuloma in cell block (H & E stain,400 X);inset showing giant cell; (C)Hydatid cyst (L-G stain,400X);inset showing hooklets; (D) Hydatid cyst (H & E stain,400 X)
Figure1 Microphotograph showing (A) Aspirate of epithelioid cell granuloma in tubercular lymphadenitis (L-Gstain,400X); inset showing numerous AFB (Z-N stain,1000X); (B) Epithelioid cell granuloma in cell block (H & E stain,400 X);inset showing giant cell; (C)Hydatid cyst (L-G stain,400X);inset showing hooklets; (D) Hydatid cyst (H & E stain,400 X)CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Microphotograph showing (A) Aspirate of metastatic adenocarcinoma in liver (L-G stain, 400X); (B) Cell block showing well-defined malignant glands (H & E stain, 400 X); (C)Aspirate from hepatocellular carcinoma (L-G stain, 400X);inset showing a closer view of malignant hepatocytes; (D) Cell block of the same case as (C) showing well defined trabecular arrangement of malignant hepatocytes (H & E stain, 400 X);inset showing a closer view of the same (H & E stain, 400X).
Figure 2 Microphotograph showing (A) Aspirate of metastatic adenocarcinoma in liver (L-G stain, 400X); (B) Cell block showing well-defined malignant glands (H & E stain, 400 X); (C)Aspirate from hepatocellular carcinoma (L-G stain, 400X);inset showing a closer view of malignant hepatocytes; (D) Cell block of the same case as (C) showing well defined trabecular arrangement of malignant hepatocytes (H & E stain, 400 X);inset showing a closer view of the same (H & E stain, 400X).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3 (A) Cell block preparation of a case of the Wilms tumor highlighting spindle cell component(H & E stain, 100X); (B) Tubular structures of the same case as (A)(H & E stain, 100X); (C) Aspirate showing pleomorphic sarcoma (L-G stain, 400X); (D) Cell block of the same case as (C) showing features suggestive of leiomyosarcoma (H & E stain; 400X)
Figure 3 (A) Cell block preparation of a case of the Wilms tumor highlighting spindle cell component(H & E stain, 100X); (B) Tubular structures of the same case as (A)(H & E stain, 100X); (C) Aspirate showing pleomorphic sarcoma (L-G stain, 400X); (D) Cell block of the same case as (C) showing features suggestive of leiomyosarcoma (H & E stain; 400X)CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [4]4. Bales Carol E. LaboratoryTechniques. In, Koss Leopold G. Koss' Diagnostic Cytol- ogy, 5nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2006. p.1590.
  2. [5]5. Nathan NA, Narayan E, Smith MM, Horn MJ. Improved Preparation and Its Efficacy in Diagnostic Cytology. Am J ClinPathol. 2000;114(4):599-606. https://doi.org/10.1309/ G035-P2MM-D1TM-T5QE PMID:11026107
  3. [6]6. Mondal A, Roy C K, Biswas J. Utility of im- aging modalities in diagnostic FNAC. J Cytol. 2002;19(3):123-8.
  4. [13]13. Pachori RM. Real time ultrasound guided as- piration biopsy of abdominal masses. An expe- rience in a developing country. Indian J Radio Img. 1989;43:223-6.
  5. [15]15. Khan N, Sherwani RK, Afroz N, Kapoor S. Use- fulness of cell block versus smears in malignant effusion cases. J Cytol. 2006;23(3):129-32.
  6. [17]17. Keyhani-Rofaga S, O'Toole RV, Leming MF. Role of cell block in fine needle aspiraton. Acta Cytol. 1984;28:630-1.
  7. [18]18. Kien WM, Haber H. Fine needle aspiration mini biopsies. ActaCytol 1986;30:403-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bhowmik, S., Chakrabarti, I., Ghosh, P., Bera, P., & Banik, T.
Affiliations
  • West Bengal University of Health Sciences (IN)
  • Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital (IN)
ORCID
Indranil Chakrabarti
Venue
Iranian Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Farname, Inc.
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
13
Issue
02
Pages
179-187
ISSN
1735-5303 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.30699/ijp.13.2.179
PMC
PMC6339483
OpenAlex
W2897430331
Semantic Scholar
e770d96bccafce0cf77fc55e1f08def99aa73633
Cited by
8
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Iranian journal of pathology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Keywords
cell block, fine needle aspiration cytology, smear cytology, diagnostic accuracy, histopathological correlation, sensitivity and specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review