CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Resource-Constrained Project SchedulingConstruction Project Management and PerformanceManagement and Optimization Techniques

Penerapan Metode CPM Dan PERT Pada Gedung Parkir 3 Lantai Grand Panglima Polim Kediri

Open access
Iluk, Tsalist, Ridwan, Ahmad, Winarto, Sigit·2020·Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi & Teknik Sipil
DOI 10.30737/jurmateks.v3i2.1054
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The project is an activity carried out to products or services that have specific scheduling. Scheduling is determined by the relationship between activities made very detailed and accurate. Therefore, the purpose of the final task is to know how to implement the Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) in scheduling the project, which originally used the Bar Chart method with a duration of 140 days and resulted in a cost of Rp. 5.500.000.000. From the calculation result of this final task in using the CPM, the method generates a period of 105 days and provides cost after crashing in the labor increase of Rp. 5.568.464.052 and the increase in working hours (overtime) Rp. 5.603.725.490. While using the PERT method generates a period of 109 days and generates the cost after being crashing in the labor increase of Rp. 5.574.721.755 and the increase of working hours (overtime) of Rp.5.612.082.633 with a projected probability of reaching the target of 84 %. Has a comparison with the difference in cost of Rp. 6,257,703 in increased workforce and Rp. 8,357,143 other than working hours.Proyek merupakan suatu kegiatan yang dilakukan untuk menghasilkan produk / jasa yang mempunyai penjadwalan tertentu. Penjadwalan ditentukan oleh hubungan antar kegiatan yang dibuat sangat rinci dan akurat. Oleh karna itu tujuan dari artikel ilmiah ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimanakah penerapan metode Critical Path Method (CPM) dan Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) pada penjadwalan proyek tersebut yang awalnya menggunakan metode Bar Chart dengan durasi waktu 140 hari dan menghasilkan biaya sebesar Rp.5.500.000.000. Dari hasil perhitungan artikel ilmiah ini dalam menggunakan metode CPM menghasilkan jangka waktu 105 hari dan mengasilkan biaya setelah di crashing dalam penambahan tenaga kerja sebesar Rp. 5.568.464.052 dan penambahan jam kerja (lembur) Rp.5.603.725.490 Sedangkan menggunakan metode PERT menghasilkan jangka waktu 109 hari dan menghasilkan biaya setelah dicrashing dalam penambahan tenaga kerja sebesar Rp. 5.574.721.755 dan penambahan jam kerja (lembur) Rp. 5.612.082.633. dengan probabilitas proyek mencapai target 84%. Mempunyai perbandingan selisih biaya sebesar Rp. 6.257.703 dalam penambahan tenaga kerja dan Rp. 8.357.143 dalam penambahan jam kerja.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30737/jurmateks.v3i2.1054

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. S. Setiawati, Syahrizal, and Rezky Ariessa Dewi, "Penerapan Metode CPM Dan PERT Pada Penjadwalan Proyek Konstruksi (Studi Kasus: Rehabilitasi / Perbaikan Dan Peningkatan Infrastruktur Irigasi Daerah Lintas Kabupaten/Kota D.I Pekan Dolok)," J. Tek. Sipil USU, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2017.
  2. J. Oka and D. Kartikasari, "Evaluasi Manajemen Waktu Proyek Menggunakan Metode Pert Dan Cpm Pada Pengerjaan 'Proyek Reparasi Crane Lampson' Di Pt Mcdermott Indonesia," J. Appl. Bus. Adm., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28-36, 2019, doi: 10.30871/jaba.v1i1.1257. · DOI
  3. J. Harmawanto, Y. C. S. P, and S. Winarto, "ANALISA ANGGARAN BIAYA DAN PENJADWALAN PROYEK PERBAIKAN TANGGUL KALI BAKUNG DESA CENGKOK KECAMATAN TAROKAN KABUPATEN KEDIRI," Jurmateks, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 224-235, 2019.
  4. R. Hidayah, A. Ridwan, and Y. C. S. P, "ANALISA PERBANDINGAN MANAJEMEN WAKTU ANTARA PERENCANAAN DAN PELAKSANAAN," Jurmateks, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 281-290, 2018.
  5. M. Mazlum and A. F. Güneri, "CPM, PERT and Project Management with Fuzzy Logic Technique and Implementation on a Business," Procedia -Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 210, pp. 348-357, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.378. · DOI
  6. N. E. Mouhoub, A. Benhocine, and H. Belouadah, "A new method for constructing a minimal PERT network," Appl. Math. Model., vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 4575-4588, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.03.031. · DOI
  7. Penerapan Metode Cpm Dan Pert Pada Gedung Parkir 3 Lantai Grand Pannglima Polim Kediri http://dx.doi.org/ 10.30737/jurmateks © 2020 JURMATEKS. Jurnal Manajemen & Teknik Sipil. All rights reserved. Aceh Barat)," Diss Univ. Teuku Umar Meulaboh, 2016. · DOI
  8. E. Safitri, S. Basriati, and L. Hanum, "Optimasi Penjadwalan Proyek menggunakan CPM dan PDM ( Studi Kasus : Pembangunan Gedung Balai Nikah dan Manasik Haji KUA Kecamatan Kateman Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir )," J. Sains Mat. dan Stat., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 17-25, 2019.
  9. G. P. Arianie and N. B. Puspitasari, "Perencanaan Manajemen Proyek Dalam Meningkatkan Efisiensi Dan Efektifitas Sumber Daya Perusahaan (Studi Kasus: Qiscus Pte Ltd)," J@ti Undip J. Tek. Ind., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189-196, 2017, doi: 10.14710/jati.12.3.189-196. · DOI · Paper page
  10. H. A. Rani, "Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi," DEEPUBLISH, pp. 1-99, 2016.
  11. R. Teknika, "EVALUASI PENGENDALIAN WAKTU DAN BIAYA MENGGUNAKAN METODE PERT PADA PELAKSANAAN PEKERJAAN JEMBATAN DI DESA PENGKOL KECAMATAN KARANGGEDE KABUPATEN BOYOLALI NASKAH," Electron. Theses Diss. UMS, pp. 1-17, 2014.
  12. Wibowo, Agung, and J. Utomo, "Eksplorasi Metode Bar Chart, CPM, PDM, PERT, Line Of Balance Dan Time Chainage Diagram Dalam Penjadwalan Proyek Konstruksi," Diss Univ. Diponegoro, vol. 166, no. 25, pp. 1-155, 2010.
  13. A. Syaiful, "ANALISIS PENJADWALAN ULANG DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PERT (PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW TECHNIQUE) (RESCHEDULING ANALYSIS WITH PERT METHODE) (Studi Kasus: Hotel Bhayangkara)," Dsp. Univ. Islam Indones., 2018.
  14. I. Oka Suputra, "Penjadwalan Proyek Dengan Precedence Diagram Method (PDM) dan Ranked Position Weight Method (RPWM)," J. Ilm. Tek. Sipil, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 18- 28, 2011.
  15. H. R. Zolfaghar Dolabi, A. Afshar, and R. Abbasnia, "CPM/LOB scheduling method for project deadline constraint satisfaction," Autom. Constr., vol. 48, pp. 107-118, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.09.003. · DOI
  16. D. Caesaron and A. Thio, "Analisa penjadwalan waktu dengan metode jalur kritis dan pert pada proyek pembangunan ruko (jl. pasar lama no.20, glodok)," J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 59-82, 2015.
  17. D. Trietsch and K. R. Baker, "PERT 21: Fitting PERT/CPM for use in the 21st century," Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 490-502, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.09.004. · DOI
  18. J.-M. Réveillac, "Scheduling with PERT and MPM," Optim. Tools Logist., pp. 77-141, 2015, doi: 10.1016/b978-1-78548-049-2.50005-0. · DOI
  19. D. Elisabeth Riska Anggraeni, "Analisis Percepatan Proyek Menggunakan Metode Crashing Dengan Penambahan Tenaga Kerja dan Shift Kerja (Studi Kasus : Proyek Pembangunan Hotel Grand Keisha, Yogyakarta)," J. Eng. Res. Appl., vol. 5, no. 2, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iluk, T., Ridwan, A., & Winarto, S.
Affiliations
Universitas Kadiri (ID)
Venue
Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi & Teknik Sipil
Publisher
Universitas Kediri
Published
2020-10-30
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
162
ISSN
2621-7686 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.30737/jurmateks.v3i2.1054
OpenAlex
W3095790761
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi & Teknik Sipil (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
Keywords
critical path method, Program Evaluation and Review Technique, project scheduling, construction projects, project crashing, labor costs, overtime costs, completion probability, construction cost comparison, construction time reduction, construction project control, construction monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review