Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Edificios heridos. Propuesta para una arqueología de los bombardeos de la Guerra Civil Española (1936-1939)

Gallego Vila, Laia, Sole i Barjau, Queralt·2019·erph_ Revista electrónica de Patrimonio Histórico

Abstract

En este artículo se presenta un nuevo enfoque patrimonial y arqueológico sobre los estudios de los bombardeos de la Guerra Civil Española contra la población civil, exponiendo una propuesta metodológica interdisciplinar que estudia las huellas de estos bombardeos, aún presentes y visibles en nuestras ciudades en el siglo XXI. Se expone la posibilidad de analizar nuevas fuentes documentales y su encaje con el trabajo arqueológico. El estudio documental y arqueológico sobre los restos de estos bombardeos permite analizar el alcance de la destrucción y la permanencia de la huella de esta particular violencia en los edifiios de la trama urbana de Barcelona. Estos restos se erigen como agentes relevantes para la memorialización de los bombardeos fascistas sobre Barcelona y problematizan a su vez la consideración de los límites del patrimonio del conflcto desde la materialidad de un pasado traumático poco abordado.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30827/e-rph.v0i23.17857

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exhumations and historical research have shown that 4% of those assassinated were women.

    “Exhumations and historical research have shown that 4% of those assassinated were women,56.”

    From Twenty years of forensic archaeology and anthropology of the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) and Francoist Regime (2021) · cites this paper as [5]

    The paper discusses Civil War bombing victims, including an estimated 5,000–5,200 deaths in Catalonia (footnote 3; page not available). Searches for exhumations, women among those assassinated, and the 4% figure found no passage addressing the claimed proportion. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. AYÁN VILA, X. M.; BLANCO ROTEA, R.; y MAÑANA BORRAZÁS, P. (2003). "Archaeotecture: seeking a new archaological vision of Architecture". En: Archaeotecture: Archaeology of Architecture, X. M. Ayàn Vila, R. Blanco Rotea, y P. Manana Borrazàs eds., Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 1 -15.
  2. DESILVEY, C.; y EDENSOR, T. (2012). "Reckoning with ruins". Progress in Human Geography 37 (4), pp. 465-485.
  3. GONZÁLEZ-RUIBAL, A. (2008a). "Arqueología de la Guerra Civil Española". Complutum, 19 (2), pp. 11 -20.
  4. GONZÁLEZ-RUIBAL, A. (2008b). "Time to Destroy. An archaeology of supermodernity". Current Anthropology, 49 (2), pp. 247-79.
  5. GONZÁLEZ-RUIBAL, A. (2013). "Reclaiming archaeology" en Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity. Pp. 1 -23.
  6. LOGAN, W.; REEVES, K. (2008). Places of pain and shame. Dealing with difficult heritage. Londres: Routledge.
  7. MIRÓ, C.; RAMOS, J. (201 1). "Els refugis antiaeris de Barcelona (1936-1937). Una nova visió des de l'arqueologia d'intervenció" Exnovo, pp. 55-79.
  8. MISA, T. J. (2004). Leonardo to the Internet. Technology and Culture from the Renaissance to the present. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  9. MOSHENSKA, G. (2009). "Resonant Materiality and Violent Remembering: Archaeology, Memory and Bombing". International Journal of Heritage Studies, 15 (1), pp. 44-56.
  10. MOSHENSKA, G. (2010). "Working with Memory in the Archaeology of Modern Conflict". Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 20 (1), pp. 33 -48.
  11. MOSHENSKA, G. (2012). "Unbuilt heritage: conceptualising absence in the historical environament". En: S. May, H. Orange, y S. Penrose. Oxford: Archaeopress, eds., The Good, the Bad and the Unbuilt: Handling the Heritage of the 21st Century,.
  12. MOSHENSKA, G. (2014). "Children in ruins: bombsites as playgrounds in Second World War Britain". En: B. Olsen y Þ. Pétursdóttir, eds., Ruin Memories: Materiality, Aesthetics and the Archaeology of the Recent Past. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 230-49.
  13. ROJO ARIZA, M.C. (2013). "¿Arqueología y aviación?: la excavación de aerodrómos de campaña en el Penedés". Revista Universitaria de Historia Militar, 2, pp. 85-108.
  14. ROJO ARIZA, M.C.; y COMA QUINTANA, L. (2010). "Arqueología y museografía didáctica en los aeródromos de guerra (1936-1939)". Ebre 38, 4, pp. 165-77.
  15. STONE, M. (2004). "A memory in ruins?", Public Archaeology, 3, pp. 131 -44.
  16. TANAKA, Y.; y YOUNG, M. B. eds. (2009). Bombing Civilians: a twentieth-century history. New York: New Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gallego Vila, L., & Sole i Barjau, Q.
Venue
erph_ Revista electrónica de Patrimonio Histórico
Published
2019-01-08
Pages
1-26
ISSN
1988-7213
Cited by
1
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review