The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ANALISIS PROFIL MODEL MENTAL SISWA SMA PADA MATERI LAJU REAKSI
Open accessAbstract
The research, entitled "Analysis Students' Profile Mental Models High School on the rate of reaction" aims to obtain an overview of high school students' mental modelson the rate of reaction.The method used is descriptive research method, involving 32 students of class XI IPA who come from high schools in the district of Ciamis.The data was collected by a research instrument diagnostic tests, interview guides and documentation of study.Research results showed that students' understanding of the sub-microscopic level on the subject matter of rate of reaction is still low compared to other levels of chemical representation.Meanwhile, the category of mental models of the students on the subject matter of rate of reaction varied for each level of chemical representation.The chemical representation relationship with the category ofmental models of high school students on the subject matter of rate of reactionis almost in line with the previous analysis, which is based on the comparison betweenthe characteristics of the chemical representation and mental models of its catagory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is based on the research by Handayanti, et al (2015) that only 45.83% of students understand the submicroscopic level.”
From Design of Science Process Skill-Based Intertextual Learning on Reaction Kinetics Concept (2022) · cites this paper as Handayanti, et al (2015)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Design of Science Process Skill-Based Intertextual Learning on Reaction Kinetics Concept
Fatihah, J. A., Widhiyanti, T., Mulyani, S., Wiji, W., & Yuliani, G. (2022) · JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya) · doi:10.15575/jtk.v7i2.20883 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Handayanti, Y., Setiabudi, A., & Nahadi, N.
- Affiliations
- Indonesia University of Education (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Handayanti, Yuli
- Venue
- Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA
- Published
- 2015-11-30
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107
- ISSN
- 2477-1422 (ISSN-L)
- 2477-2038
- OpenAlex
- W2345892178
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- id
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Chemistry Education and Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
- Keywords
- mental models, reaction rate, chemistry education, high school students, chemical representation, submicroscopic level, student understanding, diagnostic testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
