Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0Media, Religion, Digital CommunicationIslamic Finance and CommunicationMisinformation and Its Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 34 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

TikTok Algorithm and Digital Creed Challenges: A Framing Analysis of ‘The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light’ Propagation from an ASWJ Perspective

Open access
Muhammad, Manar, Sapuan, Muhammad Zaki, Zahid, Nurul Hayati·2026·Journal of Quranic Sciences and Research

Abstract

Malay: Ajaran The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light (AROPL) merupakan sebuah gerakan baharu yang menyimpang daripada akidah Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah. Gerakan ini secara agresif mengeksploitasi landskap media siber, khususnya TikTok, bagi menyebarkan fahamannya melalui pendekatan komunikasi yang tersusun dan retorik berunsur keagamaan. Kajian ini bertujuan menganalisis kandungan video TikTok berkaitan AROPL dengan memberikan penekanan khusus kepada bagaimana ciri teknikal platform tersebut terutamanya fungsi algoritma cadangan mencipta fenomena algoritma yang mempunyai kuasa seperti ‘ketuhanan’ (algorithmic conspirituality). Fenomena siber ini dimanipulasi secara strategik untuk menyebarkan gabungan teologi sinkretisme dan teori konspirasi global. Menggunakan kaedah analisis kandungan kualitatif berteraskan Teori Pembingkaian Robert M. Entman (1993), kajian ini meneliti 50 rakaman video dan hantaran penstriman langsung (live) di TikTok untuk mengenal pasti empat komponen utama: definisi masalah, punca, penilaian moral, dan penyelesaian yang ditawarkan. Seterusnya, kandungan wacana digital tersebut dinilai secara kritikal berdasarkan kriteria penyelewengan akidah yang digariskan oleh JAKIM dan Majlis Fatwa. Dapatan kajian mendapati bahawa kesan tularan ghaib daripada algorithmic conspirituality di TikTok telah berjaya membingkai kandungan AROPL untuk menyusup masuk ke dalam ruang siber audiens muda secara automatik, sekaligus menimbulkan simpati, kekeliruan doktrin, dan penerimaan terhadap fahaman yang bertentangan dengan asas Islam. Antara bentuk manipulasi yang dikesan termasuklah dakwaan bahawa kitab The Goal of The Wise merupakan kesinambungan wahyu yang lebih tinggi daripada al-Quran, penafian syariat solat lima waktu, pengubahan kiblat ke Petra, serta tafsiran batil terhadap ayat al-Quran. Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahawa kuasa algoritma platform media sosial yang digabungkan dengan naratif konspirasi kerohanian digital merupakan ancaman nyata dan sofistikated terhadap keselamatan akidah umat Islam di Malaysia. Integrasi antara teori pembingkaian siber dan kerangka penilaian Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah dalam kajian ini memberikan asas ilmiah yang kukuh untuk memahami serta membendung taktik penyelewengan akidah pascamoden dalam era kecerdasan digital. English: The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light (AROPL) is a new movement that deviates from the creed of Ahl Sunnah Wal Jamaah. This movement aggressively exploits the cyber media landscape, particularly TikTok, to propagate its ideology through a structured communication approach and religious rhetoric. This study aims to analyze TikTok video content related to AROPL by placing a specific emphasis on how the platform's technical architecture chiefly its recommendation algorithm fosters the phenomenon of "algorithmic conspirituality," where the algorithm appears to wield a "divine-like" power. This cyber phenomenon is strategically manipulated to disseminate a blend of syncretic theology and global conspiracy theories. Employing a qualitative content analysis method grounded in Robert M. Entman’s (1993) Framing Theory, this study examines 50 TikTok videos and live streams to identify four core components: problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and proposed treatment recommendations. Subsequently, the digital discourse is critically evaluated against the criteria for deviant teachings outlined by JAKIM and the National Fatwa Council. The findings reveal that the mystical viral effect of "algorithmic conspirituality" on TikTok successfully frames AROPL content to automatically penetrate the digital space of young audiences, thereby evoking sympathy, causing doctrinal confusion, and promoting the acceptance of beliefs that contradict mainstream Islamic creed. Among the identified manipulations are claims that the book "The Goal of The Wise" is a continuation of revelation superior to the Quran, the rejection of the five daily prayers, the alteration of the Qibla to Petra, and the distorted interpretation of Quranic verses. This study concludes that the power of platform algorithms combined with digital spiritual conspiracy narratives poses a real and sophisticated threat to the doctrinal security of Muslims in Malaysia. The integration of cyber framing theory and the Ahl Sunnah Wal Jamaah evaluative framework provides a robust scholarly basis for understanding and countering postmodern deviant teachings in the digital intelligence era.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This qualitative framing analysis examines 50 TikTok videos and live streams promoting The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light (AROPL), arguing that TikTok’s recommendation algorithm and “algorithmic conspirituality” help frame AROPL content for young audiences. From an ASWJ/JAKIM–Majlis Fatwa perspective, it identifies AROPL’s claims as deviant, including a new Imam Mahdi, rejection of five daily prayers, qibla change to Petra, and The Goal of The Wise as higher revelation.

Key findings

  • Across 50 TikTok videos/live streams, Entman’s four framing components appeared consistently: problem definition (Islam is corrupted, the Quran is incomplete), causal interpretation (sahaba, ASWJ ulama, governments, and global conspiracies blamed), moral evaluation (Abdullah Hashem presented as Imam Mahdi), and treatment recommendation (bai’ah, new scripture, rejection of shariat, qibla change, religious pluralism).
  • Specific AROPL claims identified include: The Goal of The Wise as a continuation of revelation higher than the Quran; rejection of five daily prayers; Ramadan in December; hijab not obligatory; moderate alcohol permitted; LGBTQ not to be judged; qibla changed to Petra; reincarnation; and Abdullah Hashem as al-Qāʾim/Imam Mahdi.
  • The paper reports AROPL’s TikTok account grew from 30,000 followers in March 2024 to 65,100 in May 2024, alongside 25,200 YouTube followers, 11,000 Facebook followers, and 8,518 Instagram followers. It notes MKI’s 2024 declaration that AROPL is deviant and contrary to ASWJ.
  • The study concludes that algorithmic conspirituality and TikTok affordances pose a sophisticated threat to Islamic creed in Malaysia, requiring stronger digital dakwah, monitoring, and enforcement.

Methods

  • Qualitative content analysis grounded in Robert M. Entman’s (1993) framing theory, using four components: problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation.
  • Data comprised 50 TikTok videos and live streams openly promoting AROPL, identified through keywords such as Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light, AROPL, Jihad cyber lawan Dajjal, Abdullah Hasyem, and related figures or hashtags.
  • Content was assessed against JAKIM and National Fatwa Council criteria for deviant teachings, within the ASWJ al-Asya’irah and al-Maturidiyyah framework, with attention to word choice, repetition, symbols/images, and delivery style.

Limitations

  • Stated limitations: Not stated in the paper.
  • Evident from the text: the sample is limited to 50 TikTok videos/live streams selected by keywords, so findings may not represent all AROPL content or its full platform reach.
  • Evident from the text: no audience reception, engagement metrics, or algorithmic data are analyzed; the assessment is normative, based on ASWJ/JAKIM–Majlis Fatwa criteria.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30880/jqsr.2026.07.01.003

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 4 Not valid · 43 Not checked · 45 Own results and interpretations

21 more claims

Create a free account to see all 92 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 44
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 40

Create a free account to see these claims.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Deni Suryanto, Ahmad Rozai'e Akbar, Dawami, Izzah Nur Aida Zur Raffar dan Salasiah Hanin Hamjah. 2024. The Utilization of Social Media in Improving Adolescent Social Interaction with Parents. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication 40(1): 395-407.
  2. Iffa Nabila Mohamad Kharithah dan Nur Zainatul Nadra Zainol. 2024. Ajaran Sesat Si Hulk: Ancaman kepada Akidah Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah di Malaysia. Journal of Quranic Sciences and Research 5(2): 27-37.
  3. Introvigne, Massimo dan Karolina Maria Kotkowska. 2024. The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light: An Introduction. The Journal of CESNUR 8(3): 33-51.
  4. Mohd Khairul Naim bin Che Nordin. 2023. Symbiotic Relationship between Deviant Religious Teachings and Conspiracy Theories: Characteristics, Adaptability, and Impact on The Muslim Community. Online Journal of Research in Islamic Studies 10(2): 89-110.
  5. Muhammad Anshar, Asni Djamereng dan Muh. Ilham. 2024. Content Analysis and Audience Receptions of Online Da'wah on YouTube Social Media. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication 40(1): 173-187.
  6. Muhammad Syahmi Fitri Abdul Wahid, Abdul Rauf Ridzuan, Nur Lisa Ridzuan, Nurul Atiqah Nasrin, Intan Nur Amira Abdul Wahab, Y.D. dan N.D. 2023. The Acceptance of Tiktok As a Da'wah and Learning Platform. I- iECONS e-proceedings, hlm. 407-415. http://iiecons.usim.edu.my.:
  7. Nasution, Nadya Amalia. 2024. Da'wah bil Social Media: A Phenomenological Study of iGeneration TikTok Platform Users. Journal of Public Relations and Digital Communication (JPRDC) 2(2): 77-88.
  8. Nurulain Ibrahim dan Siti Aisyah Samudin. 2022. Cabaran Penguatkuasaan Undang-Undang bagi Kesalahan Jenayah Syariah Mengajar Agama Tanpa Tauliah di Alam Siber: Kajian di Bahagian Penguatkuasaan Undang- Undang Jabatan Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan. Journal of Shariah Law Research 7(2).
  9. Pippert, Courtlyn, Katherine Furl & Alice Marwick. 2025. True believers, entertainers, and skeptical scholars: claims and frames on conspiracy TikTok. Journal of Information Technology & Politics: 1-16.
  10. Reinis, Sara. 2025. 'TikTok is One Long Conversation with The Universe': How Platform Affordances Shape Emerging Spirituality Across TikTok Manifestation Content. International Journal of Communication 19: 1750-1767.
  11. Usman, Amirsyah & Haidir Fitra Siagian. 2024. University Students' Engagement with Ulamas' Political Messages on Social Media. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication 40(2): 310-327.
  12. Wu, Jiaxi, Jessica L. Fetterman, Jennifer Cornacchione Ross & Traci Hong. 2025. Effects of Message Frames and Sources in TikTok Videos for Youth Vaping Cessation: Emotions and Perceived Message Effectiveness as Mediating Mechanisms. Journal of Adolescent Health 76(1): 122-130.
  13. Zanirah Mustafa @ Busu, Intan Nurul 'Ain Mohd Firdaus Kozako, Abdul Majid Tahir Mohamed, Noraini Junoh, Nor Asmira Jusoh, Mohd Nazri Mat Zin. 2021. Statutory Provisions of Malaysian Law to Subdue Deviant Teachings in The Religion of Islam and Its Implication. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 29(Special Issue 2): 89-104.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Muhammad, M., Sapuan, M. Z., & Zahid, N. H.
Affiliations
  • Kolej Universiti Islam Johor Sultan Ibrahim (MY)
  • National University of Malaysia (MY)
Venue
Journal of Quranic Sciences and Research
Publisher
Penerbit UTHM
Published
2026-06-30
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
2773-5532 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7171740687
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Quranic Sciences and Research (publishedVersion)
  • International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology (Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Media, Religion, Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Islamic Finance and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
TikTok, algorithmic amplification, Islamic creed (aqidah), Islamic apologetics, conspiracy theories, syncretism, frame analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.