Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its Potential Impact on the Future of Higher Education
Open accessAbstract
Still rebounding from the impact of the global pandemic, the higher education sector is being challenged even further by the next wave of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. These technologies have the power to generate in a matter of seconds, quality text, images, music and coding responses to questions or prompts entered into an online chat box. Currently, one of the most accessible and popular text generators is OpenAI’s ChatGPT which was released in November 2022. Early evaluation indicates that the quality of the responses exceed standard pass rates for comparable university assessments. Even if academic protocols mandate that text cited from AI sources should be acknowledged and referenced as any other source material, the speed, accessibility and high quality of the AI material justifies a rethink of the purpose of higher education and a redesign of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. An initial suggestion being promoted in the sector is that learning outcomes and assessments should move away from a focus on content memorisation and recall, to development of higher order thinking skills such as critical analysis, evaluation, resilience, creativity, problem solving, appraising and mastery of verbal communication and computer literacy. This preliminary paper examines some of the literature to date, which discusses potential risks and threats, as well as the opportunities to enhance learning, embedded in this new wave of emerging AI technologies in higher education. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence technologies, generative text software, implications for curriculum, pedagogy and assessment design.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 24
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete Edition. New York: Longman.
- Bennett, L., Abusalem, A. (2023). Building Academic Integrity and Capacity in Digital Assessment in Higher Education. Athens Journal of Education 2023, 10: 1-24 https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.X-Y-Z Bieger, J., Thorisson, K., Garrett, D. (2014). Raising AI: tutoring matters, in 7 th international conference, AGI 2014, Quebec city, QC, Canada august 1-4, 2014 proceedings. · DOI
- Editors B. Goertzel, L. Orseau, and J. Snaider (Berlin, Germany: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-09274-4 · DOI
- Biggs, J., Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy (New York: Academic Press.
- Bommarito, M., Katz, D. (2022). GPT Takes the Bar Exam (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4314839). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4314839 · DOI · Paper page
- Bubeck, S, (2023). Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT- 4. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.12712.pdf · arXiv
- Byrne, E., Clarke, C. (2020). The University Challenge: Changing Universities in a Changing World. Pearson Education.
- Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2023). I, Human: AI, Automation, and the Quest to Reclaim What Makes Us Human. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Chui, M., Hall, B, Mayhew, H, Singla, A. (2022). The state of AI in 2022-and a half decade in review. Quantum Black. AI by McKinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/ca pabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-in-2022-and-a-half-decade-in- review
- Dondi, M., Klier, J., F Panier, F., Schubert, J. (2021). Defining the skills citizens will need in the future world of work. McKinsey and Company. https://www.semanticscholar. org/paper/Defining-the-skills-citizens-will-need-in-the-world-Dondi-Klier/3fbbf 024d28890bffa6cf4a71e84a58f37646a51
- Gardner, H. (1986). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books, 2011. DOI:10.2307/3332707 · DOI
- Girdhar, N. (2022). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education Sector: Possibilities and Challenges. Chapter in Machine Learning, Blockchain, and Cyber Security in Smart Environments Application and Challenges. Taylor and Francis Group. DOI: 10.1201/9781003240310-2/role-artificial-intelligence-education-sector-possibilities- challenges-riya-aggarwal-nancy-girdhar-alpana · DOI
- Krathwohl, D. (2002). "A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview". Theory into Practice. Routledge. 41 (4): 212-218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2. ISSN 0040 -5841. S2CID 13116159. · DOI · Paper page
- Korteling, J., van de Boer-Visschedijk, G., Blankendaal, R., Boonekamp, R., Eikelboom, A. (2021) Human-versus Artificial Intelligence. Front. Artif. Intell., 25 March 2021 Sec. AI for Human Learning and Behavior Change. Vol 4 -2021 https://doi.org/10. 3389/frai.2021.622364 · DOI · Paper page
- Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., Salovey, P. (1999). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27(4), 267-298
- Neha, K. (2020). Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Alochana Chakra Journal, IX (IX), 305-309.
- Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A. (2010). A brief history of the Internet. Published online by Cambridge University Press.
- Poquet, O., de Laat, M. (2021). Developing capabilities: Lifelong learning in the age of AI. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 52.4 pp1695-1708. https://doi. org/10.1111/bjet.13123 · DOI
- Salomon, G., Perkins, D., Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies. Educational Researcher. 1 April Vol 20.3 p 2-9. DOI:10.3102/0013189X020003002 Corpus ID: 8517562 · DOI · Paper page
- Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: being human in the age of artificial intelligence (First ed.). New York: Knopf.
- Yousuf, M., Wahid, A. (2021). The role of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Current Trends and Future Prospects. International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT), Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2021, pp. 1-7, doi:10.1109/ICISCT52966.2021.9670009. · DOI
- Authors
- Bennett, L., & Abusalem, A.
- Venue
- Athens Journal of Education
- Published
- 2024-07-19
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 195-212
- ISSN
- 2241-7958 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4400828766
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Athens Journal of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in higher education, generative AI, ChatGPT, academic integrity, assessment design, curriculum redesign, pedagogy, higher-order thinking skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
