The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Introducing Digital Technology in a Rural Classroom: One Teacher’s Experience
Open accessAbstract
Digital technology (DT) does not come with a ‘menu’ of what teachers can select to transform their instructional practices; it is through use and reflection in/on practice that potential affordances are abstracted. Computer simulation (CS) as DT was explored through auto-ethnography, reflexivity, and action research. The findings of the study revealed that the use of DT when teaching is a sense-making process employed to respond to the contextual and situational demands of the concerned teacher. It is a dynamic and unpredictable situated practice that is focused on the emergent affordances resulting from the interface between technology and pedagogy. The aim is to craft a ‘contextualized’ technology-driven pedagogy to meet the teaching and learning needs of learners in rural schools. It is a professional learning activity that develops self-knowledge and skills that enrich the knowledge base of the individual teacher. Such knowledge contributes to practice innovation, where DT is adopted and adapted to make learning interesting and inclusive and where it engages learners in constructing their knowledge and developing skills to achieve set learning outcomes. The findings are more descriptive than prescriptive since teaching endeavours cannot be cloned but could assist other teachers who might be interested in using DT in their specific contexts. Keywords: digital technology, learning, reflection, rural schools, teaching
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Tsoka and Kriek [78] provide an illustrative example of the importance of CRT.In their study, a pre-service teacher faced resistance from learners when explaining lightning as a phenomenon caused by electric charges.The learners accused the teacher of dishonesty, as there is a widely held belief in some African cultures that lightning can be intentionally caused by certain individuals.”
From Are Pre-Service Teachers Receiving Quality Mentoring in Rural Schools? A Synopsis from Research in South Africa (2026) · cites this paper as [78]
In the citing paper
“Tsoka and Kriek [78] highlight the advantages of digital technologies in supporting teaching and learning that actively engage students and foster conceptual understanding, rather than simply facilitating the transmission of information.”
From Are Pre-Service Teachers Receiving Quality Mentoring in Rural Schools? A Synopsis from Research in South Africa (2026) · cites this paper as [78]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tsoka, M., Runhare, T., Machisi, E., & Magosha, T. A. (2026) · Trends in Higher Education · doi:10.3390/higheredu5020037
“Tsoka and Kriek [78] highlight the advantages of digital technologies in supporting teaching and learning that actively engage students and foster conceptual understanding, rather than simply facilitating the transmission of information.”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsoka, M., & Kriek, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Venda (ZA)
- University of South Africa (ZA)
- Venue
- Athens Journal of Education
- Published
- 2025-06-17
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 423-442
- ISSN
- 2241-7958 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4411376304
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Athens Journal of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Social Sciences › Education › Education in Rural Contexts
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- digital technology in teaching, rural schools, computer simulation, teacher learning, technology and pedagogy integration, sensemaking, reflective practice, teacher self-awareness, practice innovation, inclusive learning, teacher experiences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review