The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigation of Stress, Anxiety, Depression and Psychological Well-Being Levels of Individuals who Regularly Play Tennis
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
This research was carried out to examine the stress, anxiety, depression and psychological well-being levels of individuals who regularly play tennis. The research group consisted of 450 individuals. In the study, “Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale,” “Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory” and “Psychological Well-Being Scale” were used as data collection tools. In the analysis of the data the normality test of the data was carried out by applying the Kolmogorov-Smirnov technique and the Skewness-Kurtosis coefficients. T-test was used to determine whether the stress, anxiety, depression and psychological well-being levels of individuals differ in terms of gender variable. One-way analysis of variance (Anova) technique was used to determine whether they differed in terms of tennis playing time. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis technique was used to examine the relationship between stress, anxiety, depression and psychological well-being. In addition, multiple regression analysis was applied to test how stress is a predictor of anxiety, depression and psychological well-being. According to the results obtained in the study, while there was no significant difference in the levels of stress, anxiety, depression and psychological well-being in terms of the gender variable (p>0.05), there was a significant difference in terms of the duration of playing tennis (p<0.05). While a positive and significant relationship was observed between stress, anxiety and depression, it was observed that there was a negative significant relationship between psychological well-being and stress, anxiety and depression. It has also been found that stress is a strong predictor of anxiety, depression and psychological well-being.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Comprehensive empirical inquiries, employing both quantitative and qualitative methodologies, conspicuously attest to the link between intensified perfectionistic inclinations and amplified life stress or anxiety, cognitive inflexibility, and diminished psychological wellbeing”
From SELF-INVESTIGATION INTO REPERCUSSIONS OF PERFECTIONIST BEHAVIOR ON ACADEMIC ANXIETY AND FLEXIBILITY AMONGST CHINESE POSTGRADUATES (2023) · cites this paper as Yüceant, 2022
Citations
Cites
Kisch, J., Leino, E. V., & Silverman, M. M. (2005) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.35.1.3.59263 · Cited by 489
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
(2020) · doi:10.31887/dcns · Cited by 307
Schuch, F. B., Vancampfort, D., Rosenbaum, S., Richards, J., Ward, P. B., Veronese, N., Solmi, M., Cadore, E. L., & Stubbs, B. (2016) · Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria · doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2016-1915 · Cited by 226
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wei, L.-W. (2023) · European Journal of Education Studies · doi:10.46827/ejes.v10i12.5111 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Aksaray University, T., & Yüceant, M.
- Venue
- Education Quarterly Reviews
- Publisher
- Asian Institute of Research
- Published
- 2022-06-30
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2621-5799
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review