Cited by 900Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Question Asking During Tutoring

Graesser, Arthur C., Person, Natalie K.·1994·American Educational Research Journal

Abstract

Whereas it is well documented that student question asking is infrequent in classroom environments, there is little research on questioning processes during tutoring. The present study investigated the questions asked in tutoring sessions on research methods (college students) and algebra (7th graders). Student questions were approximately 240 times as frequent in tutoring settings as classroom settings, whereas tutor questions were only slightly more frequent than teacher questions. Questions were classified by (a) degree of specification, (b) content, and (c) question-generation mechanism to analyze their quality. Student achievement was positively correlated with the quality of student questions after students had some experience with tutoring, but the frequency of questions was not correlated with achievement. Students partially self-regulated their learning by identifying knowledge deficits and asking questions to repair them, but they need training to improve these skills. We identified some ways that tutors and teachers might improve their question-asking skills.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/00028312031001104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Question-depth research shows that questions vary not only in frequency but also in cognitive quality: some request surface clarification, whereas others require causal, functional, interpretive, or explanatory reasoning.

    “Question-depth research shows that questions vary not only in frequency but also in cognitive quality: some request surface clarification, whereas others require causal, functional, interpretive, or explanatory reasoning (Graesser et al., 2014;Graesser & Person, 1994).”
  • Various taxonomies for question categories have been proposed.

    “When we consider the question categories, various taxonomies were proposed.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 900

Authors
Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Venue
American Educational Research Journal
Published
1994-03
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
104-137
ISSN
  • 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1011
OpenAlex
W2098555131
Cited by
900
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 47
FWCI
12.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
questioning, tutoring, student questions, question quality, student self-regulation, knowledge deficit, academic performance, research methods instruction, algebra instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review