Competing Explanations of Undergraduate Noncompletion
Abstract
In this paper we analyze longitudinal data from a nationally representative panel of college entrants to test and compare several theoretical explanations of college degree attainment and noncompletion. So far, relatively little emphasis has been placed on determining the relative and combined predictive power of competing explanations or mechanisms of college noncompletion. We utilize a methodological tool—the sheaf coefficient—to combine multiple variables into single conceptual predictors and estimate their relative effect sizes across college types. We then draw implications of these findings both for theory and for policy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Student outcomes at two-year versus four-year colleges are best modeled separately.
“Separate models were run for students enrolled at two-year versus four-year colleges; there is research establishing that student outcomes at these different types of institutions are best modeled separately (e.g., Attewell, Heil, & Reisel, 2011).”
From Competing hypotheses about online versus face-to-face course outcomes: Analysis leveraging the unique circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic (2025) · cites this paper as Attewell, Heil, & Reisel, 2011
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 74 · Cited by 162
- Authors
- Attewell, P., Heil, S., & Reisel, L.
- Affiliations
- City University of New York (US)
- Institute for Social Research (NO)
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 536-559
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1011
- OpenAlex
- W2105160971
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 51.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Demography › Evasion and Academic Success Factors
- Keywords
- college degree attainment, undergraduate students, competing explanations, university type, effect size, student attrition, higher education policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review