Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, Experience, and Inquiry in Educational Practice
Abstract
John Dewey and L. S. Vygotsky share similar ideas concerning the relationship of activity and learning/development, especially the roles everyday activities and social environment play in the educational process. However, the two theorists are far apart in their conception of the relationship between process and goals in education. Dewey concentrates on means in education, believing that it is the ability of the individual to question through experience that is most important for the human community. Vygotsky, while recognizing the importance of (especially cultural) process in education, sees social and cultural goals as being integrated into social pedagogy. This paper compares Dewey and Vygotsky on three key points that relate directly to educational processes and goals. First, the two theorists are compared on the role of social history and the tools it produces. Dewey sees social history as creating a set of malleable tools that are of use in present circumstances. Vygotsky believes that tools developed through history have a far more lasting impact on the social community. Second, the two theorists are compared in their conceptualizations of experience/culture. Dewey sees experience as helping to form thinking, whereas Vygotsky, in his cultural historical theory, posits culture as the raw material of thinking. Third, the two theorists are compared on their perspectives on human inquiry. Dewey sees the child as a free agent who achieves goals through her own interest in…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The development of scientific concepts is not dependent on where they were learnt, but on whether the concepts and procedures were made accessible in ways that incite their adaptation to other circumstances.
“Indeed, the development of what Vygotsky (1978) refers to as scientific concepts, which are held to be more robust than everyday concepts, is not dependent on where they were learnt, but whether the concepts and procedures were made accessible in ways that incite their adaptation to other circumstances (Glassman 2001).”
From Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments (2004) · cites this paper as Glassman 2001
Cites
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING <sup>*</sup>
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments
Billett, S. (2004) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/13665620410550295 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
- Authors
- Glassman, M.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Glassman, Michael
- ORCID
- Glassman, Michael
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2128011398
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 106.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational theories and practices
- Keywords
- John Dewey, Vygotsky, social history, historical-cultural theory, inquiry, social pedagogy, mentoring, course program, classroom strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review