Cited by 315Pragmatism in Philosophy and EducationPsychology of Development and EducationEducational theories and practices

Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, Experience, and Inquiry in Educational Practice

Glassman, Michael·2001·Educational Researcher

Abstract

John Dewey and L. S. Vygotsky share similar ideas concerning the relationship of activity and learning/development, especially the roles everyday activities and social environment play in the educational process. However, the two theorists are far apart in their conception of the relationship between process and goals in education. Dewey concentrates on means in education, believing that it is the ability of the individual to question through experience that is most important for the human community. Vygotsky, while recognizing the importance of (especially cultural) process in education, sees social and cultural goals as being integrated into social pedagogy. This paper compares Dewey and Vygotsky on three key points that relate directly to educational processes and goals. First, the two theorists are compared on the role of social history and the tools it produces. Dewey sees social history as creating a set of malleable tools that are of use in present circumstances. Vygotsky believes that tools developed through history have a far more lasting impact on the social community. Second, the two theorists are compared in their conceptualizations of experience/culture. Dewey sees experience as helping to form thinking, whereas Vygotsky, in his cultural historical theory, posits culture as the raw material of thinking. Third, the two theorists are compared on their perspectives on human inquiry. Dewey sees the child as a free agent who achieves goals through her own interest in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x030004003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development of scientific concepts is not dependent on where they were learnt, but on whether the concepts and procedures were made accessible in ways that incite their adaptation to other circumstances.

    “Indeed, the development of what Vygotsky (1978) refers to as scientific concepts, which are held to be more robust than everyday concepts, is not dependent on where they were learnt, but whether the concepts and procedures were made accessible in ways that incite their adaptation to other circumstances (Glassman 2001).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glassman, M.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Glassman, Michael
Venue
Educational Researcher
Published
2001-05
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
3-14
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
OpenAlex
W2128011398
Cited by
315
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
FWCI
106.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational theories and practices
Keywords
John Dewey, Vygotsky, social history, historical-cultural theory, inquiry, social pedagogy, mentoring, course program, classroom strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review