The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Authorizing Students’ Perspectives: Toward Trust, Dialogue, and Change in Education
Abstract
This article argues for attending to the perspectives of those most directly affected by, but least often consulted about, educational policy and practice: students. The argument for authorizing student perspectives runs counter to U.S. reform efforts, which have been based on adults’ ideas about the conceptualization and practice of education. This article outlines and critiques a variety of recent attempts to listen to students, including constructivist and critical pedagogies, postmodern and poststructural feminisms, educational researchers’ and social critics’ work, and recent developments in the medical and legal realms, almost all of which continue to unfold within and reinforce adults’ frames of reference. This discussion contextualizes what the author argues are the twin challenges of authorizing student perspectives: a change in mindset and changes in the structures in educational relationships and institutions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Authorizing pupil voice (Cook-Sather, 2002) changes the power dynamic between the teacher and pupil, as teachers cede power to pupils, thus providing them with freedom and co-responsibility for their own learning process.”
From Pedagogies of embodiment in physical education – a literature review (2022) · cites this paper as Cook-Sather, 2002
Citations
Cites
BRUNER, J. S. (1960) · doi:10.4159/9780674028999 · Cited by 6,042
Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy
Ellsworth, E. (1989) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250 · Cited by 2,759
Research works printed but not linked: 100
- AlcoffLMBellLABlumfeldDThe problem of speaking for othersOvercoming racism and sexism1995Lanham, MDRowman & Littlefield229254
- AlvermanDPeerled discussions: Whose interests are served?Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy199639282289
- 10.1080/10862969709547950 · DOI
- 10.1598/RRQ.31.3.2 · DOI
- BanksJAMulticultural education, transformative knowledge, and action: Historical and contemporary perspectives1996New YorkTeachers College Press
- 10.1016/S1070-3241(00)26060-4 · DOI
- BritzmanDPractice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach1991aNew YorkState University of New York Press
- BritzmanDDecentering discourses in teacher education: Or, the unleashing of unpopular thingsBoston University Journal of Education1991b17336080
- BritzmanDSt. PierreEAPillowWS“The question of belief”: Writing post-structural ethnographyWorking the ruins: Feminist poststructual theory and methods in education2000New YorkRoutledge2740
- BruhnJGEqual partners: Doctors and patients explore the limits of autonomyJournal—Oklahoma State Medical Association20019424654
- BrunerJThe process of education1977Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press
- BussEConfronting developmental barriers to the empowerment of child clientsCornell Law Review199984895
- CallahanREEducation and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of the public schools1962ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press
- CaporrimoRStudent perceptions, beliefs, and attitudesAcademic Exchange Quarterly200152
- ClarkCFlights of fancy, leaps of faith: Children’s myths in contemporary America1995ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press
- CohenJWeisLFineMConstructing race at an urban high school: In their minds, their mouths, their heartsBeyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States schools1993Albany, NYState University of New York Press289308
- ColsantLNichollsJGThorkildsenTA“Hey, man, why do we gotta take this . . . ? ” Learning to listen to studentsReasons for learning: Expanding the conversation on student-teacher collaboration1995New YorkTeachers College Press6289
- 10.1080/00405849509543666 · DOI
- Cook-SatherAClarkCMTranslating themselves: Becoming a teacher through text and talkTalking shop: Authentic conversation and teacher learning2001aNew YorkTeachers College Press1639
- 10.1080/10476210120068066 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1012240505690 · DOI
- Cook-SatherARe(in)forming the conversations: Student power position and voice in teacher educationRadical Teacherunder review
- Cook-SatherAShultzJShultzJCook-SatherAStarting where the learner is: Listening to studentsIn our own words: Students’ perspectives on school2001aLanham, MDRowman & Littlefield117
- Cook-SatherAShultzJShultzJCook-SatherANegotiating worlds and words: Writing about students’ experiences of schoolIn our own words: Students’ perspectives on school2001bLanham, MDRowman & Littlefield165178
- 10.3102/0013189X024005012 · DOI
- 10.1080/00405849509543669 · DOI
- DaviesBLife in the classroom and playground: The accounts of primary school children1982BostonRoutledge
- 10.17763/haer.58.3.c43481778r528qw4 · DOI
- DeweyJArchambaultRDMy pedagogic creedDewey on education1964ChicagoThe University of Chicago Press427439
- DuckworthEThe virtues of not knowing“The having of wonderful ideas” and other essays on teaching and learning1987New YorkTeachers College Press6479
- 10.1037/10176-003 · DOI
- EricksonFShultzJJacksonPWStudents’ experience of curriculumHandbook of research on curriculum1992New YorkMacmillan
- 10.1598/RRQ.37.1.2 · DOI
- FindersMJust girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high1997New YorkTeachers College Press
- 10.4135/9781412984706 · DOI
- FineMWeisLFineMSexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desireBeyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States schools1993Albany, NYState University of New York Press75100
- FreirePPedagogy of the oppressed1990New YorkContinuum
- 10.5040/9798216425137 · DOI
- FriendRWeisLFineMChoices not closets: Heterosexism and homophobia in schoolsBeyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States schools1993Albany, NYState University of New York Press209236
- GallasKTalking their way into science: Hearing children’s questions and theories, responding with curricula1995New YorkTeachers College Press
- GarbarinoJScottFWhat children can tell us1989San FranciscoJossey-Bass Inc
- 10.1080/00405849509543671 · DOI
- GirouxHBorder crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education1992New YorkRoutledge
- GoreJLukeCGoreJWhat can we do for you? Whatcan “we” do for “you”?: Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogyFeminisms and critical pedagogy1992New YorkRoutledge
- 10.1207/S15327027HC1202_4 · DOI
- GreigATaylorJDoing research with children1999Thousand Oaks, CASage
- HeilbrunCWriting a woman’s life1988New YorkBallantine Books
- HerbartJFLengeAFOutlines of educational doctrine1901New YorkMacmillan
- 10.1080/00405849509543668 · DOI
- hooksbTeaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom1994New YorkRoutledge
- Hudson-RossSClearyLCaseyMChildren’s voices: Children talk about literacy1993Portsmouth, NHHeineman
- HurderAJNegotiating the lawyer-client relationship: A search for equality and collaborationBuffalo Law Review19964471
- 10.1080/00405849509543665 · DOI
- KamlerBRelocating the personal: A critical writing pedagogy2001New YorkState University of New York Press
- KliebardHMThe struggle for the American curriculum, 1893–19581986BostonRoutledge & Kegan Paul
- Knowledge Quest305in press
- KotlowitzAThere are no children here: The story of two boys growing up in the other America1991New YorkDoubleday
- KozolJSavage inequalities: Children in America’s schools1991New YorkHarper Perennial
- 10.7326/0003-4819-134-9_Part_2-200105011-00012 · DOI
- Ladson-BillingsGThe dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children1994San FranciscoJossey-Bass
- LensmireTJWhen children write: Critical revisions of the writing workshop1994New YorkTeachers College Press
- 10.4324/9781410600585 · DOI
- LewisMWithout a word: Teaching beyond women’s silence1993New YorkRoutledge
- 10.4159/9780674417502 · DOI
- 10.1080/00405849509543664 · DOI
- LockeJSome thoughts concerning educationWorks of John Locke1823Vol. 9LondonThomas Tegg, Sharpe and Son
- MannLChambersDDesigning a consumer friendly practiceAustralian Family Physician2001303241244
- McLarenPLife in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education1989New YorkLongman
- 10.1097/00005650-200104000-00006 · DOI
- MojeEShepardsonDGuzzettiBHyndCSocial interactions and children’s changing understanding of electric circuits: Exploring unequal power relations in “peer”-learning groupsPerspectives on conceptual change1998Mahwah, NJErlbaum225234
- NesporJTangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process1997Mahwah, NJL. Erlbaum Associates
- NichollsJThorkildsenTReasons for learning: Expanding the conversation on student-teacher collaboration1995New YorkTeachers College Press
- NietoSAffirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education2000New YorkLongman
- OldfatherPLearning from student voicesTheory Into Practice1995a432
- 10.1080/00405849509543670 · DOI
- OldfatherPThomasSWhat does it mean when teachers participate in collaborative research with high school students on literacy motivations?Teachers College Record1998904647691
- 10.58680/rte19991691 · DOI
- 10.1080/00405849509543667 · DOI
- OrnerMLukeCGoreJInterrupting the calls for student voice in “liberatory” education: A feminist poststructuralist perspectiveFeminisms and critical pedagogy1992New YorkRoutledge
- PhelanPDavidsonALCaoHTSpeaking up: Students’ perspectives on schoolPhi Delta Kappan1992739695704
- PhelanPDavidsonALYuHCAdolescents’ worlds: Negotiating family, peers, and school1998New YorkTeachers College Press
- PopeDCDoing school: How we are creating a generation of stressed out, materialistic, and miseducated students2001New Haven, CTYale University Press
- PoplinMWeeresJVoices from the inside: A report on schooling from inside the classroom1992Claremont, CAClaremont Graduate School, Institute for Education in Transformation
- RosenthalDELawyer and client: Who’s in charge?1974New YorkRussell Sage Foundation
- RousseauJJBoydWEmileThe Emile of Jean Jacques Rousseau: Selections1965New YorkTeachers College PressOriginal work published in 1762
- SachsSBVoices of reason: Adolescents talk about their futures over time2002Westport, CTBergin & Garvey
- SanonFBaxterMFortuneLOpotowSShultzJCook-SatherACutting class: Perspectives of urban high school studentsIn our own words: Students’ perspectives on school2001Lanham, MDRowman & Littlefield7391
- ShorIFreire for the classroom: A sourcebook for liberatory teaching1987Portsmouth, NHHeinemann
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226147864.001.0001 · DOI
- ShultzJCook-SatherAIn our own words: Students’ perspectives on school2001Lanham, MDRowman & Littlefield
- SkinnerBFContingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis1969New YorkAppleton-Century-Crofts
- SpringJHThe sorting machine: National educational policy since 19451976New YorkMcKay
- 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.444 · DOI
- StewartMPatient-centred medicine transforming the clinical method1995Thousand Oaks, CASage Publications
- WalkerBPopkewitzTSBrennanM“Childhood” in the emergence and spread of U.S. public schoolsFoucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education1998New YorkTeachers College117143
- WalshDTobinJGraueMSpodekBThe interpretive voice: Qualitative research in early childhood educationHandbook of research on the education of young children1993New YorkMacmillan464474
- WeisLFineMBeyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States schools1993Albany, NYState University of New York Press
- WelchSA feminist ethic of risk1990Minneapolis, MNFortress Press
- WilsonBLCorbettHDListening to urban kids: School reform and the teachers they want2001New YorkState University of New York Press
- WillisPLearning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs1997Farnborough, UKSaxon House
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 661
Digital tool use and self-regulated strategies in a bilingual online learning environment
Freihofner, U., Campbell, C., & Smala, S. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73417-0_8 · Cited by 3
Empathy and Emotion in Education and Beyond
Demetriou, H. (2018) · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-54844-3_9 · Cited by 3
Becoming a Socio-ecological Educator
O'Connor, J., Jeanes, R., Alfrey, L., & Wattchow, B. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7167-3_3 · Cited by 3
Do not listen to students’ voices: give them the power to transform!
Nießner, S., & Rosén, A. (2025) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2025.2513431 · Cited by 3
“Even though the involvement of students encompasses many opportunities to further develop current education practices (Cook-Sather 2002; Pleasance 2016), the students’ voices often remain underrepresented in the discourse around SE.”
Hierarchy, Stigma and Construction of Marginal Citizenship in Everyday Schooling
Varghese, C. (2025) · Journal of Asian and African Studies · doi:10.1177/00219096251318235 · Cited by 3
“It’s been argued that the empowerment of the student is directly linked to participation in classroom activities, and once they are denied formal power in the classroom, they get disengaged (Cook-Sather, 2002; Durst, 1999; Willis, 2003).”
Li, Y.-L., Xu, W., Liu, X.-J., Situ, J.-J., Ng, K. C., Ma, H.-H., & Xie, Q.-Q. (2025) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01392-x · Cited by 2
“Meanwhile, teachers and school policy-makers can improve education’s accessibility to students by listening to and respecting students’ opinions, motivating them to create their preferred mode of education (Cook-Sather, 2002, 2006).”
Geurts, E. M. A., Reijs, R. P., Leenders, H. H. M., Simons, E. M. C., Jansen, M. W. J., & Hoebe, C. J. P. A. (2023) · Citizenship Social and Economics Education · doi:10.1177/14788047231225747 · Cited by 5
“…being granted opportunities for curriculum negotiation is thought to be particularly relevant for vulnerable students (Brooker and MacDonald, 1999; Cook-Sather, 2002), the vast majority of existing studies focus on university students (e.g., Bergmark and Westman, 2016; Bovill, 2014; Carey, 2013).”
BackgroundDyke, E. (2023) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/00131946.2023.2169694 · Cited by 2
“If teachers, older students, and parents/caregivers are officially excluded from shaping educational policy, very young people have even less to no say in imagining their future educational worlds (Cook-Sather, 2002).”
BackgroundComplex and Connected Lives: Voices of “English Language Learners” in Middle School
Case, A. F. (2021) · Middle Grades Review · doi:10.70793/mgr.103 · Cited by 2
“Critiquing the lack of student voices in educational research, Cook-Sather (2002) calls on researchers to “count students among those who have the knowledge and position to shape what counts as education” (p. 3).”
Hartman, S. L., Lowery, C. L., Kennedy, C., Hess, M., Coy, M. P., Kennedy, M., & Kaufman, A. (2021) · Peabody Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0161956x.2020.1864249 · Cited by 2
“For reasons ranging from difficulty in obtaining research consent to an underestimation of their ability to provide meaningful data, children’s voices are noticeably missing in the research literature (Ainscow & Messiou, 2018; Cook-Sather, 2002, 2006; Dockett & Perry, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialFrom the perspective of the students: Reporting counselor educators teaching practices
Insorio, A. O. (2021) · International Journal of Didactical Studies · doi:10.33902/ijods.2021266616 · Cited by 2
“…sensitivity with others, and motivation (Arnot, McIntyre, Pedder, & Reay, 2004; Cook-Sather & Alter, 2011; Bovill, Cook-Sather, & Felten, 2011; Cook-Sather, 2002) The idea of authorizing students’ perspectives is important because it can enhance present educational practices, revisits the…”
BackgroundAmin, R., Ahmed, F., & Haidar, S. (2020) · Academic journal of social sciences · doi:10.54692/ajss.2020.04021044 · Cited by 2
“According to Byrnes and Rickards (2011) and Cook-Sather (2002), students’ perceptions about their schooling have a strong correlation with their academic performance.”
BackgroundAn English Learner as a Cultural Broker for Youth Interviews
Reyes, C. C. (2019) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3671 · Cited by 2
“(Oldfather, 1995, p. 87) In examining the term student voice, Cook-Sather (2002) described the implications for listening and what that might look like when engaging young people’s voices.”
BackgroundWhy School Turnaround Failed: Lethal Problems
Murphy, J., & Bleiberg, J. F. (2018) · Education, equity, economy · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01434-6_4 · Cited by 4
Challenges in International Service Learning
Nurbatra, L. H. (2018) · English education : jurnal tadris Bahasa Inggris · doi:10.24042/ee-jtbi.v11i1.2675 · Cited by 2
Elaborative feedback in clinical dental teaching-An assessment from the students' perspective.
Olms, C., Jakstat, H. A., & Haak, R. (2017) · Annals of Anatomy · doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2017.02.007 · Cited by 2
Practicing Collaborative Relations of Power: English Language Learners’ Perspectives
Shim, J., & Bentahar, A. (2016) · The journal of language teaching and learning · doi:10.66887/jltl.v6i1.20 · Cited by 2
“All rights reserved ISSN: 2146-1732 According to Krashen (1982/2009), language acquisition and learning requires meaningful interaction in the target language in which ELLs are provided with learning opportunities where they connect with their life experience. Perhaps the required curriculum necessitates teaching Shak…”
BackgroundInfluentialKlitmøller, J. (2016) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2016.1200023 · Cited by 4
“(Cook-Sather, 2002, p. 3) School reforms are often undertaken without student involvement, to the detriment of the reform efforts (Cook-Sather, 2007). not only is the exclusion of student perspectives ethically problematic because it means that students get little say in matters that concern them,…”
BackgroundResearching in cross cultural contexts: A socially just process
McNae, R., & Strachan, J. (2010) · doi:10.15663/wje.v15i2.112 · Cited by 2
Allowing Idiosyncratic Learners to Thrive
Matthews, D. J., & Kitchen, J. (2007) · doi:10.1300/15582150802098647 · Cited by 2
“Student voices were of particular interest as they are too often silent and silenced when they should be regarded as “expert witnesses” on their own educational experiences (Cook-Sather, 2002, p. 3).”
BackgroundEgan, S., O’Donovan, M., & Lafferty, N. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101847 · Cited by 2
Ethical Considerations in Conducting Research with Children
Mayasari, E. D. (2022) · Parezja Czasopismo Forum Młodych Pedagogów przy Komitecie Nauk Pedagogicznych PAN · doi:10.15290/parezja.2022.18.07 · Cited by 2
“The games can restore viewpoints that players have lost as a result of the impact of educational practices (Cook-Sather, 2002). The research also involves an ethnographic approach and narrative documentation. The method reduces researchers’ tendency to make assumptions in processing the obtained information. Research…”
BackgroundNuma-Bocage, L., & Weil, S. (2019) · Education et francophonie · doi:10.7202/1060846ar · Cited by 2
“Dans cet article, ce phénomène est examiné dans une perspective psychopédago-gique s’appuyant sur la parole de l’élève (Cook-Sather, 2002; Florin, 1987).”
Kozak, D. (2019) · doi:10.14288/1.0378458 · Cited by 2
“58 valued spaces within which they can speak (Cook-Sather, 2002).”
BackgroundLymbery, J. (2017) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17060141 · Cited by 2
“When researchers translate themselves into partners with students in the research process, they are no longer the distanced, authoritative, sole authors of the meaning derived from qualitative research approaches such as observations of and interviews with students (Cook-Sather, 2012). The research begins to shift fro…”
Tobin, D. (2014) · Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) · doi:10.21427/d77b63 · Cited by 1
“Researchers agree that the bottom-up approach can be transformational in improving teaching practice (Goldspink, Winter, and Foster, 2008; Cook-Sather, 2002).”
BackgroundMaking Connections: Networked Mindmaps as a student centred assessment for learning.
Ryan, B. J. (2013) · Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) · doi:10.21427/d7mc90 · Cited by 2
“The students felt empowered by their role as knowledge providers and active participants leading to a powerful collaborative and constructive learning environment (Cook-Sather, 2002).”
BackgroundOn a Commitment to Gender and Sexual Minority Justice
Martino, W. (2013) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-305-8_12 · Cited by 2
Higgins, J., Bonne, L., & Parsons, R. (2011) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-531-4 · Cited by 2
Educational Partnerships and the Challenge of Educational Reform
Russell, T. (2008) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4642-1_5 · Cited by 2
“The perspective of a context of productive learning is drawn from the work of Sarason (1996, 2004), while the significance of listening is drawn from the work of Cook-Sather (2002) .”
BackgroundMethodSmyth, J. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781315855301-9 · Cited by 2
O’Leary, M., Jones, J., Hughes, J., Wright, V., & Cui, V. (2026) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2026.2680080 · Cited by 1
“Reciprocity (Cook-Sather 2002; Fielding 2001) featured prominently in the dialogic encounters between participants.”
Amplifying Vulnerable Youths' Voices: Transforming Thinking Skills through Inclusive Pedagogies
Lapidot-Lefler, N. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102256 · Cited by 1
Sharaf-Addin, M. A., & Al-Shehabi, S. M. (2026) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.17507/tpls.1602.18 · Cited by 1
“This aligns with the work of Cook-Sather (2002), who argues, positioning students as partners in teaching and learning can lead to more meaningful and effective educational change.”
Embedding student voice in European alliances
Messi, N. (2025) · International Journal for Students as Partners · doi:10.15173/ijsap.v9i2.6698
“Initiated by Professor Alison Cook-Sather at Bryn Mawr College, this model represents the foundational framework upon which many subsequent initiatives have been built (Cook-Sather, 2002, 2006, 2009).”
Valencia, J. J. O., & Rivera, J. (2025) · The Quality of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13538322.2025.2576327 · Cited by 1
“…perspectives can be traced back to authors who emphasised that students are not passive recipients but active participants in their education (cook-Sather, 2002), viewing them as consumers of higher education. despite governmental emphasis on considering students as clients, this notion has…”
Reconsidering engagement: aligning teacher qualities with Indigenous students’ aspirations and needs
Skrebneva, I., Lowe, K., & Goetz, K. (2024) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2024.2438644 · Cited by 1
“Establishing trust with students is crucial (Cook-Sather 2002); however, it is equally imperative that educators seek ongoing, meaningful engagements with parents and Aboriginal communities, respecting Aboriginal aspirations, which place shared responsibilities on parents, community members, and…”
InfluentialLEARNERS' PERSPECTIVES ON USING THE FORVO WEBSITE AS A STRATEGY TO ENHANCE SPEAKING SKILLS
Zaki, A. A., Hermansyah, & Jaya, A. (2024) · Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme · doi:10.31851/esteem.v8i1.17084 · Cited by 1
“The ideas, attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions that students have regarding their educational experiences are referred to as student perspectives (Cook-Sather, 2002).”
Weiler, C., Mertens, S. B., Nagle, J. F., Pettit, S. K., & Wall, A. (2024) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14121316 · Cited by 1
Luguetti, C., Turelli, F., Speranza, D., Wachter, J., & Konjarski, L. (2024) · European Physical Education Review · doi:10.1177/1356336x241294069 · Cited by 1
“Some PSTs in the present study expressed a keen interest in integrating co-design principles into their future teaching, highlighting the importance of authentic student involvement in collaborative design endeavours (Bovill et al., 2011; Cook-Sather, 2002).”
Black African Postgraduate Students' Authorial Voice in Scholarship
Pietersen, D., & Dube, M. (2024) · Research in Social Sciences and Technology · doi:10.46303/ressat.2024.38 · Cited by 1
“An authorial voice does not appear overnight: it develops over time, after much reading and writing (Cook-Sather, 2002).”
BackgroundSalman, S., & Thamer, Z. (2024) · Higher Education Studies · doi:10.5539/hes.v14n3p60 · Cited by 1
“Cook-Sather (2002) seems to support the VL concept indirectly by suggesting that teachers need to give authority to students by giving them the power to join conversations with no existing power structure and re-direct the teacher’s direction.”
BackgroundVoice Matters: How Can a School Listen to Student Voice in School Governance?
Wen, J. (2023) · Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.54097/ehss.v22i.12521 · Cited by 1
“…with a dual challenge: to modify the ingrained structures within our educational mindset that create resistance towards eliciting and acknowledging student voices, and to alter the structures in educational relationships and institutions that both uphold and are reinforced by this reluctance [15].”
BackgroundHow am I doing? Soliciting student feedback in the secondary English classroom
Davis-Porada, N. (2023) · English Teaching: Practice & Critique · doi:10.1108/etpc-08-2022-0100 · Cited by 1
Alarm Will Sound: Student Perceptions of Risk-Free Space at School
Altenburger, E., Rae, L., Edgerton, E., Mckechnie, J., Almers, E., Askerlund, P., Samuelsson, T., Miller, N. C., Kumar, S., Pearce, K., et al. (2023) · Children, Youth and Environments · doi:10.1353/cye.2023.0000 · Cited by 1
“I argue that these cultures are characterized by a lack of trust in teenage students (Cook-Sather, 2002) and originate in the dominant youth discourse that understands teenagers as “risky subjects” who need to be managed (Besley, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialExamining student depictions of actual and ideal learning experiences in elementary general music
Hanson, J. (2022) · Research Studies in Music Education · doi:10.1177/1321103x221096553 · Cited by 1
“Traditionally, students have not had a strong voice in educational research and reform (Cook-Sather, 2002; Levin, 2000).”
BackgroundSa’adah, F., Sumaryanto, S., Subagyo, S., & Komarudin, K. (2021) · MAJORA: Majalah Ilmiah Olahraga · doi:10.21831/majora.v27i2.47125 · Cited by 1
“Adapun Cook-Sather (2002) menyatakan dinamika guru memberikan kekuasaan pada siswa dengan kebebasan dan tanggung jawab bersama untuk proses belajar dalam pendidikan jasmani.”
BackgroundReflections on student power: An absurdist viewpoint
Bierdz, B. (2020) · Power and Education · doi:10.1177/1757743820984179 · Cited by 1
“Students within these spaces want change, but they are caught within a system of normalization and regularization that they have become accustomed to throughout their schooling (Cook-Sather, 2002).”
BackgroundA Student-Centered Cost-Benefit Analysis of Online Homework
Boudreaux, G., Haugh, J., Johnson, E. A., Tinney, L., & Whitlock, C. (2020) · PRIMUS - Problems, Resources, and issues in mathematics undergraduate studies · doi:10.1080/10511970.2020.1827324 · Cited by 1
“Indeed, educational research suggests that to improve our classroom practices, “we need to embrace more fully the work of authorizing students’ perspectives in conversations about schooling . . . ” [7].”
BackgroundChange in the examination pattern in 1st year MDS- boon or bane: A Survey
Khandelwal, S., Kolhe, S. A., Verulkar, A., Bajaj, T. D., Potode, N. B., & Pakhale, P. (2020) · International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation · doi:10.4103/ijor.ijor_14_20 · Cited by 1
Friso, V., & Nenzioni, M. (2020) · doi:10.7346/-fei-xviii-02-20_17 · Cited by 1
“It is possible to describe the idea behind this approach in the words of Cook-Sather (2002), when she explains that “There is something fundamentally amiss about building an entire [education] system without consulting at any point those it is ostensibly designed to serve.””
BackgroundSupervision of Graduate Studies: A Case Study of Postgraduate and Academic Satff
Alshehry, A. (2020) · European Scientific Journal · doi:10.19044/esj.2020.v16n16p40 · Cited by 1
Ableitinger, C., Anger, A., & Dörner, C. (2020) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2020.1782495 · Cited by 1
“…was conducted on the voice of students revealed the potential of listening to students in order to understand teaching and learning and make it more effective (e.g. Cook-Sather, 2002; Fielding, 2001; Hancock &Mansfield, 2002; McCallum et al., 2000; Pollard & Triggs, 2000; Rudduck & Flutter, 2000).”
BackgroundZadra, C., & Ceretti, F. (2020) · MeTis - Mondi educativi Temi indagini suggestioni · doi:10.30557/mt00123 · Cited by 1
“For some years now, an increasing number of studies has emphasized the importance of the students’ point of view on learning and co-designing new teaching perspectives, in the direction of a real student participation (Cook-Sather, 2002; 2013; Fielding, 2011).”
BackgroundCollaborative inquiry into service learning: ethical practice through a Pedagogy of CARE
Wasner, V. (2019) · Journal of Research in International Education · doi:10.1177/1475240919830005 · Cited by 1
“Pedagogical relationships are therefore built on mutual respect, understanding and trust (Cook-Sather, 2002).”
BackgroundKennedy, B. L. (2013) · Middle Grades Research Journal · doi:10.1108/mgrj-09-2015-0007 · Cited by 10
McFeetors, P. J. (2014) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3ww7777z · Cited by 1
Elwood, J., & Baird, J. (2013) · doi:10.1080/14748460.2013.799806 · Cited by 1
Educational Experience, Standardisation and Instrumentalism: A Century of Limited Change
Hennessy, J., & Mcnamara, P. (2012) · International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education · doi:10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2012.0135 · Cited by 1
“Sather’s [9] offers a similar perspective suggesting that authorizing student perspectives runs counter to many reform efforts, which hitherto have focused on adults’ conceptualization and practice of education.”
BackgroundSPECTACLE AND SYMBOLIC SUBVERSION
Stack, M. (2008) · doi:10.1080/17482790802078615 · Cited by 1
Formation of Study Groups: Exploring Students' Needs and Practical Challenges
Schenk, C., & Strickroth, S. (2024) · International Conference on Computer Supported Education · doi:10.5220/0012545000003693 · Cited by 1
“Considering the students’ perspective is important though, in order to gain valuable insights into their experiences and to better identify how to support their learning (Cook-Sather, 2002).”
BackgroundEquity Pedagogies for Inclusive Online Classrooms in Higher Education
Santos, I. M., & Wu, W.-L. (2022) · Handbook of Research on Future of Work and Education · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8275-6.ch023 · Cited by 1
Thinking About the Future for Learning: ILE Realities and Possibilities
Reinsfield, L. (2021) · Pedagogy and Partnerships in Innovative Learning Environments · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-5711-5_11 · Cited by 1
Introducing Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices into Another Culture: The Experience in Chile
Fuentealba, R., Hirmas, C., & Russell, T. (2020) · International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1710-1_46-1 · Cited by 1
What's Next? From Analysis to Action
Miguel, A. C., Sloughter, J. M., Dorsey, J., Hartley, R. S., Shih, F. J., & Crevier, J. (2024) · Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference (CoNECD) · doi:10.18260/1-2--36139 · Cited by 2
“Talking to students directly also allowed to privilege student voice [29] [30], and this study includes direct quotations from students wherever possible.”
BackgroundVoix d’élèves en difficulté dans un dispositif d’entretien télévisé
Collin-Vallée, T., Fortier-Moreau, G., & Merri, M. (2019) · Education et francophonie · doi:10.7202/1060847ar · Cited by 1
“Voices of students in difficulty: a television interview The Anglo-Saxon studies on student voice (Cook-Sather, 2002; Fielding, 2007) examined conditions that would allow students to express their experiences on learning, teaching and education.”
BackgroundInfluentialLiberating the Oppressed Consciousness of Preservice Teachers Through Critically Reflective Praxis
Liebenberg, R., Bosman, V., & Dippenaar, H. (2019) · Educational Research for Social Change · doi:10.17159/2221-4070/2019/v8i2a3 · Cited by 2
Education and Architecture: Seeking Grounds for Dialogue
Zuccoli, F. (2019) · Renewing Middle School Facilities · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19629-5_2 · Cited by 1
African American Students, Racism, and Academic Injustice
Jones, P. W. G., & Hope, W. C. (2019) · Research Anthology on Empowering Marginalized Communities and Mitigating Racism and Discrimination · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-9108-5.ch001 · Cited by 1
The impact of culture on environmental education in Java, Indonesia
Prabawa-Sear, K. (2018) · doi:10.26182/5d088684adaa6 · Cited by 1
“…agency (O’Boyle, 2013; Rudduck, 2002; Rudduck & Flutter, 2000) , the value of the student perspective in education evaluation and improvement (Cook-Sather, 2002; A. Gough, 1999; McIntyre, Pedder, & Rudduck, 2005), educational benefits for students (Busher, 2012; 49 J. Rudduck, 2002) and…”
BackgroundDavydenko, V. A., Andrianova, E. V., & Васильевна, Л. Д. (2018) · Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Социально-экономические и правовые исследования · doi:10.21684/2411-7897-2018-4-1-28-75 · Cited by 1
Roege, G. B. (2016) · W&M Publish (College of William & Mary) · doi:10.21220/w4x59v · Cited by 1
School Culture and the Affective Learning Needs of Latino Long-term English Learners
Ray, M. (2000) · doi:10.15760/etd.2206
“As schools look to improve the educational outcome of Latino EL, listening to voices of former LTEL as they share their high school experiences may provide insights into ways to support the affective learning needs, academic success, and acculturation of Latino EL (Cook-Sather, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialGiple, P. P. (2013) · Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) · doi:10.7282/t34f1pcd · Cited by 1
“In addition, student voice in this study is conceptualized as an educational motivational construct (Schmakel, 2008): an important factor in students’ academic performance (Cook-Sather, 2002; Cushman, 2003; Oldfather, 1995; Wilson & Corbett, 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialExperiences of New Teachers inInclusive Classrooms in BC
Moore, J. L., & Roberts, J. (2007) · doi:10.5206/eei.v17i3.7610 · Cited by 1
“Although the idea of listening to students to inform ideas about educational policy is echoed throughout the literature (Cook-Sather, 2002; Corbett & Wilson, 1995; Lincoln, 1995; Poplin & Weeres, 1993; Schultz & Cook-Sather, 2001) only recently, has there been research stating the need to include students to inform in…”
BackgroundEngaging with the views of students to promote inclusion in education
Ainscow, M., & Messiou, K. (2017) · Journal of Educational Change · doi:10.1007/s10833-017-9312-1 · Cited by 189
“In addition, Cook-Sather (2002) refers to the twin challenges of authorising student perspectives: that is, a change in mindset, as well as changes in the structures in educational relationships and institutions.”
BackgroundImagining an ideal school for wellbeing: Locating student voice
Simmons, C. A., Graham, A. P., & Thomas, N. (2014) · Journal of Educational Change · doi:10.1007/s10833-014-9239-8 · Cited by 147
Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction in regular class lessons
Askell‐Williams, H., Lawson, M. J., & Skrzypiec, G. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9182-5 · Cited by 136
“…dspace.flinders.edu.au One outcome of a lack of connection between research and classrooms is that the precise nature of students’ knowledge about their cognitive and metacognitive skills during their everyday engagement with typical class lessons is not well documented (Cook-Sather, 2002).”
Cook‐Sather, A. (2013) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9292-3 · Cited by 91
“A second wave of student voice work arose in the early 2000s (Cook-Sather 2002; Fielding 2001; Pekrul and Levin 2005; Rudduck and Flutter 2004), and since then analyses of and guidelines for how to pursue such work have proliferated (Cook-Sather 2009b; Fielding 2006; MacBeath et al. 2003; Rudduck…”
BackgroundSelf-citationAboriginal student stories, the missing voice to guide us towards change
Donovan, M. J. (2015) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-015-0182-3
Könings, K., van Zundert, M. V., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. V. (2007) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055690701423648
Kinser-Traut, J. Y., & Turner, E. E. (2018) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-018-9410-x
Attanucci, J. S. (2004) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/0305724042000200010 · Cited by 22
“High-school students are prime candidates for the conference table (Cook-Sather, 2002).”
BackgroundDescriptive feedback: student voice in K-5 classrooms
Rodgers, C. (2018) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-018-0263-1
Biddle, C. (2018) · Journal of educational change · doi:10.1007/s10833-018-9326-3
Projecting student voice by constructing grounded theory
Johnston, O., Wildy, H., & Shand, J. (2020) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-020-00410-y · Cited by 8
Meeting the discipline challenge: Capacity-building youth-adult leadership
Brasof, M. (2019) · Journal of educational change · doi:10.1007/s10833-019-09343-5
Centering Youth Voice and Belonging: An Intergenerational Inquiry into AI Policy
Vo, A., Freed, J., & Kramer, E. (2026) · English Journal · doi:10.58680/ej20261150514
Keene, M., Marranca, N., LaGrand, J., Mead-Colegrove, A., Eckhoff, A., & Haegele, J. (2026) · Journal of participatory research methods · doi:10.35844/001c.167136
Solheim, K., & Reikerås, E. (2026) · Nordisk tidsskrift for utdanning og praksis · doi:10.23865/up.v20.7467
Bader, B.-M., & Ehrlin, A. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2710575
“The results in the present study are in line with (Cook-Sather, 2002; Friesen, 2017; Lundy, 2018; Tisdall, 2015) works underscoring that teachers need to see students as unique individuals, attend to their experiences and emotions, and actively seek and take their views seriously, especially in…”
InfluentialLee, C. (2026) · Curriculum and Teaching · doi:10.7459/ct/410105
Dewi, S. D., Sukmaningrum, R., & Wiyaka, W. (2026) · JP3 (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Profesi Pendidik) · doi:10.26877/jp3.v12i1.663
Invitation and Initiative: Advancing Student Scholars in SoTL
Abbot, S., & Cook‐Sather, A. (2026) · Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal · doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.14.25
“My work in advancing student SoTL scholars had a precursor in inviting students to analyze teaching and learning through my decades of work that centered student experiences and voices in secondary teacher preparation (Cook-Sather 2002b, 2003, 2009).”
Self-citationYassin, H. A. (2026) · Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes · doi:10.22190/jtesap250728004y
Co-creation of learning and teaching as an equity-oriented approach
Cook‐Sather, A., & Edelstein, J. (2026) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2026.2617286 · Cited by 1
“…as teachers as well as learners, starting with positioning secondary students as co-creators of undergraduate secondary teacher preparation (Cook-Sather, 2002a) and moving through co-creating five iterations of a course on transforming higher education with different undergraduate student…”
Self-citationExpanding Whose Voices Are Included in Academic Publishing About Student Services
Cook-Sather, A. (2025) · doi:10.30688/janzssa.2025-2-05
“In response, one of my earliest published articles focused on “authorizing” student perspectives in teacher education (Cook-Sather, 2002), and my work since then has evolved from a commitment to “authorizing” to a commitment to creating structures and spaces within which students can author(ize)…”
Self-citationLawton, A., Bush, R., & Williams-Crossen, S. (2025) · Communication Disorders Quarterly · doi:10.1177/15257401251378126
“Cook-Sather (2002) highlighted that when students have a voice in the educational process, such as participation in curriculum design or assessments, they are more likely to feel ownership over their learning.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook-Sather, A.
- Affiliations
- Director of the Bryn Mawr/Haverford Education Program, 101 N. Merion Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010; . Her research interests include integrating the perspectives of high school students into preservice teacher education, rethinking education through the metaphor of translation, and facilitating professional development for college faculty, librarians, and instructional technologists
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2062286037
- Cited by
- 959
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 66.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
- Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College (Bryn Mawr College) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
- Keywords
- student perceptions, student voice, educational reform, constructivist teaching, critical pedagogy, postmodern feminism, feminist poststructuralism, educational trust, dialogue in education, educational institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review