Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Can Be Done About School Shootings?: A Review of the Evidence

Borum, Randy, Cornell, Dewey G., Modzeleski, William, Jimerson, Shane R.·2010·Educational Researcher

Abstract

School shootings have generated great public concern and fostered a widespread impression that schools are unsafe for many students; this article counters those misapprehensions by examining empirical evidence of school and community violence trends and reviewing evidence on best practices for preventing school shootings. Many of the school safety and security measures deployed in response to school shootings have little research support, and strategies such as zero-tolerance discipline and student profiling have been widely criticized as unsound practices. Threat assessment is identified as a promising strategy for violence prevention that merits further study. The article concludes with an overview of the need for schools to develop crisis response plans to prepare for and mitigate such rare events.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x09357620

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Anderson R. N., 2001, National Vital Statistics Reports, 49, 1
  2. Band S. R., 1999, FBI: Law Enforcement Bulletin, 68, 9
  3. 10.1177/1541204006296171 · DOI
  4. Brock S. E., 2009, School crisis prevention and intervention: The PREPaRE model
  5. Brooks K., 2000, School house hype: Two years later
  6. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2006, Criminal victimization in the United States, 2005—Statistical tables (No. NCJ 215244)
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008, MMWR Weekly, 57, 33
  8. Cooper K. J., 2000, Washington Post, A11
  9. 10.1108/09578230310504670 · DOI
  10. Cornell D., 2006, School violence: Fears versus facts
  11. Cornell D., 2006, Guidelines for responding to student threats of violence
  12. 10.1037/a0016182 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086266 · DOI
  14. Dinkes R., 2007, Indicators of school crime and safety: 2007 (NCES 2008–021/NCJ 219553)
  15. Dwyer K., 2000, Safeguarding our children: An action guide
  16. Dwyer K., 1998, Early warning, timely response: A guide to safe schools
  17. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 1994, Uniform crime reports: Crime in the United States
  18. Fein R., 2002, Threat assessment in schools: A guide to managing threatening situations and to creating safe school climates
  19. 10.1002/pits.1005 · DOI
  20. 10.1300/J202v03n02_07 · DOI
  21. Gill M., 2005, Assessing the impact of CCTV
  22. 10.1080/00131720308984553 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s12207-009-9040-9 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/000271620056700102 · DOI
  25. Insley A. C., 2001, American University Law Review, 50, 1039
  26. International Association of Chiefs of Police, 1999, Guidelines for preventing and responding to school violence
  27. Langman P., 2009, Why kids kill: Inside the minds of school shooters
  28. 10.1002/ab.10061 · DOI
  29. 10.17161/foec.v40i1.6863 · DOI
  30. McGee J., 1999, Forensic Examiner, 8, 16
  31. 10.1097/00004583-200106000-00018 · DOI
  32. Minino A. M., 2006, National Vital Statistics Reports, 54, 1
  33. Modzeleski W., 2008, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57, 33
  34. Moore M., 2003, Deadly lessons: Understanding lethal school violence
  35. Morse J., 2000, Time, 50
  36. O’Toole M. E., 2000, The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective
  37. Priks M. (2008, April). Do surveillance cameras affect unruly behavior? A close look at grandstands (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2289). Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1126633 · DOI
  38. Randazzo M. R., 2006, Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice, 147
  39. 10.1111/1467-9930.00115 · DOI
  40. Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Advisory Committee, 2007, Enhancing achievement and proficiency through safe and drug-free schools
  41. School Health Policy and Programs Study, 2007, Journal of School Health, 77, 385, 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00226.x · DOI
  42. 10.1207/S15326918CS0303_2 · DOI
  43. Snell L., 2005, School violence and No Child Left Behind: Best practices to keep kids safe (Policy Study No. 330)
  44. 10.1177/019874290803400104 · DOI
  45. 10.1177/1524839905278454 · DOI
  46. U.S. Department of Education, 2004, Unsafe school choice option: Non-regulatory guidance
  47. Van Dyke R., 2004, Appraisal and prediction of school violence: Methods, issues, and contexts, 37
  48. Van Dyke R., 2006, The handbook of school violence and school safety, 603
  49. 10.1177/0013916507309996 · DOI
  50. Vossekuil B., 2002, The final report and findings of the Safe School Initiative: Implications for the prevention of school attacks in the United States
  51. Welsh B., 2002, Crime prevention effects of closed circuit television: A systematic review
  52. 10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8140184 · DOI
  53. 2000, CQ Researcher, 10, 1
  54. 10.1300/J202v05n04_04 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/oso/9780195110654.001.0001 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Borum, R., Cornell, D. G., Modzeleski, W., & Jimerson, S. R.
Venue
Educational Researcher
Published
2010-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
27-37
ISSN
  • 0013-189X
  • 1935-102X
Cited by
229
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Can Be Done About School Shootings?: A Review of the Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/0013189x09357620
The paper
Borum, R., Cornell, D. G., Modzeleski, W., & Jimerson, S. R. (2010). What Can Be Done About School Shootings?: A Review of the Evidence. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x09357620

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.