Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations.
Abstract
El estudio se propuso determinar si la motivación al logro y el autoconcepto social permitían identificar conglomerados en estudiantes de bachillerato intelectualmente sobresalientes. Se realizó un diseño clasificatorio con una metodología cuantitativa para lo cual, mediante un muestreo aleatorio simple, se seleccionaron 133 estudiantes sobresalientes. Se identificaron dos conglomerados de estudiantes: el primero se denominó 'Altamente orientado al logro', y el segundo como 'Poco orientado al logro', respectivamente. Los estudiantes del primer conglomerado se caracterizaron por una mayor motivación al logro académico, menor autoconcepto social y mejor promedio académico. Se concluyó que en los aspectos motivacionales y emocionales los estudiantes sobresalientes presentan diferencias importantes, lo que sugiere tener cuidado con las generalizaciones realizadas sin sustento empírico. Asimismo, evidenció la importancia de la identificación de las diferencias individuales como parte de las estrategias de orientación y tutoría a estos alumnos.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These findings are consistent with the predictions of the Exercise and Self-Esteem Model and Shavelson's model of self-concept.
“These findings are consistent with the predictions of the Exercise and Self-Esteem Model 30 and Shavelston's model of self-concept. 31”
From Physical Activity for Cognitive and Mental Health in Youth: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms (2016) · cites this paper as [31]
According to theory, improvements in specific physical self-perceptions (e.g., perceived sport competence) generalize to improvements in overall physical self-concept and ultimately to enhanced self-esteem.
“As previously described, improvements in specific physical self-perceptions (e.g., perceived sport competence) are hypothesized to generalize to improvements in overall physical self-concept and ultimately to enhanced self-esteem.”
From Physical Activity for Cognitive and Mental Health in Youth: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms (2016) · cites this paper as [31]
The supplied passages and additional search results are headed as a different article, “Perfiles de estudiantes mexicanos con aptitudes intelectuales sobresalientes”; they cite Shavelson et al. but do not provide its text. I searched for perceived sport competence, physical self-concept, and self-esteem, but the available passages do not establish the hypothesized progression between them. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAccording to theory, improvements in self-esteem should be expected in the presence of positive changes in self-perceptions or self-concept.
“According to the theory, improvements in self-esteem should be expected in the presence of positive changes in self-perceptions or self-concept.”
From Physical Activity for Cognitive and Mental Health in Youth: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms (2016) · cites this paper as [31]
The indexed passages are from a Spanish-language article that cites Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976), rather than from the cited paper itself. Searches for self-esteem and positive changes in self-perceptions returned no passage establishing whether their theory predicts improved self-esteem, so the claim cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 82 · Cited by 4,164
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Al-Shabatat, M., Abbas, A. & Nizam, I. (2010). The direct and indirect effects of the achievement motivation on nurturing intellectual giftedness. international journal of human and social sciences, 5 (9), 580-588. Recuperado de http://www. waset.org/journals/ijhss/v5/v5-9-86.pdf.
- Bain, S. & Bell, S. (2004). Social self-concept, social attributions, and peer relationships in fourth, fifth, and sixth graders who are gifted compared to high achievers. gifted Child Quar- terly, 48, 167-178. doi: 10.1177 /001698 620404800302. · DOI
- Benito, Y. (2012). Identificación temprana. En M. Dolores, J. Betancourt y M. Zavala (Eds.), Alumnos superdotados y ta- lentosos (2da. ed.) (pp. 99-120). Distrito Federal, México: Manual Moderno.
- Blanco, R., Ríos, C. & Benavides, M. (2006). Respuestas educativas para niños con talento. En M. Benavides, A. Maz, E. Castro & R. Blanco (Eds.), la educación de niños con talento en iberoamé- rica (pp. 49-60). Santiago de Chile, Chile: OREAL/UNESCO.
- Bong, M. (1997). Generality of self-efficacy judgment: Eviden- ce of hierarchical relations. journal of educational Psycho- logy, 89 (4), 15-24. Recuperado de http://psycnet.apa.org/ index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1997-43826-011.
- Byrne, B. & Shavelson, R. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents: A test of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. journal of Personality and social Psychology, 70, 599-613. Recu- perado de http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/70/3/.
- Carroll, A., Houghton, S. & Bagliani, J. (2000). Goals and reputations amongst children. The validation of the im- portance of goals and reputation enhancement scales. school Psychology international, 21, 115-135. doi: 10.1177/0143034300212001. · DOI
- Caso, J. & Hernández, L. (2007). Variables que inciden en el rendimiento académico de adolescentes mexicanos. Revista latinoamericana de Psicología, 39 (3), 487-501. Recupe- rado de http://openjournal.konradlorenz.edu.co/index.php/ rlpsi/article/view/339/239
- Davis, H. & Connell, J. (1985). The effect of aptitude and achievement status on the self-system. gifted Child Quar- terly, 29, 131-136. doi: 10.1177/001698628502900306 · DOI
- Del Siegle, D. & McCoach, B. (2005). Making a difference: motivating gifted students who are not achieving. tea- ching exceptional Children, 38 (1), 22-27. Recuperado de http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer? vid=9&sid=73d686f2-479b-4bce-a8139ec15ba350e1%40.
- Esnaola, I., Goñi, E. & Madariaga, J. (2008). El autoconcepto: perspectivas de investigación. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 13 (1), 69-96. Recuperado de http://www.ehu.es/ojs/index. php/psicodidactica/article/view/231/227.
- Ferrándiz, C., Prieto, M., Hernández, D. & Llor, L. (2011). Pro- cedimiento de identificación. En M. Prieto (Ed.), Psicología de la excepcionalidad (pp. 41-54). Madrid, España: Síntesis.
- Génovard, C., Almeida, L., Prieto, M. & Hernández, D. (2011). Modelos para el estudio de la alta habilidad. En M. Prieto (Ed.), Psicología de la excepcionalidad (pp. 25-40). Ma- drid, España: Síntesis.
- Gómez, M. & Valadez, M. (2010). Relaciones de la familia y del hijo/a con superdotación intelectual. faísca, 15 (17), 67-85. Recuperado en www.ucm.es/info/sees/web/ima- ges/2010/articulo%205.pdf.
- Gómez, M., Verdugo, M. & González, F. (2007). Calidad de vida y autoconcepto en adolescentes con necesidades educativas especiales y sin ellas. infancia y Aprendizaje, 30 (4), 523-536. doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1174/021037007 782334300. · DOI
- Good, T. & Brophy, J. (2007). looking in classrooms (10 Th. Ed.). USA. Pearson.
- Gotffried, A., Gotffried, A. & Guerin, D. (2006). The Fullerton longitudinal study: A long-term of intellectual and motiva- tional giftedness. journal for the education of the gifted, 29, 430-450. doi: 10.4219/jeg-2006-244. · DOI
- Gotzent, C. & González, C. (1993). Socialización. En L. Pérez (Ed.), 10 palabras claves en superdotados (pp. 215-244). Madrid, España: Verbo Divino.
- Kramer, L. (1991). The social construction of ability per- ceptions: An ethnographic study of gifted adolescent girls. journal of early Adolescence, 11(3), 340-362. doi: 10.1177/0272431691113003. · DOI
- La Rosa, J. & Díaz-Loving, R. (1991). Evaluación del autocon- cepto. Una escala multidimensional. Revista latinoameri- cana de Psicología, 2 (1), 15-33.
- McCoach, D. & Siegle, D. (2003). The structure and function of academic self-concept in gifted and gen- eral education students. Roeper Review, 25 (2), 61- 65. Recuperado en http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/ detail?vid=4&sid=c8fd9d2e-8c4b-48c2-baceaf64b51ccb 85%40sessionmgr13&hid.
- Neihart, M., Reis, S., Robinson, N. & Moon, S. (2002). the so- cial and emotional development of gifted adolescents. What do we know? Texas, USA: Prufrock Press. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). higher education and regions. global competitive, locally engaged. Paris, France: OCDE.
- Paba, C., Cerchiaro, E. & Sánchez, L. (2008). Identificación de estudiantes con altas capacidades en el distrito de Santa Ma- ría. universitas Psychologica, 7 (1), 251-262. Recuperado de www.redalyc.org/pdf/647/64770118.pdf.
- In S. Pfeiffer (Ed.), handbook of giftedness in Children. Psycho-educational theory, research and best practices (pp. 177-198). New, York, USA: Springer.
- Rimm, S. (2010). Underachievement Syndrome: A psychological defensive pattern. In S. Pfeiffer (Ed.), handbook of giftedness in Children. Psycho-educational theory, research and best practices (pp. 139-160). New, York, USA: Springer.
- Rinn, A. (2006). Effects of a Summer Program on the Social Self-Concepts of Gifted Adolescents. journal of Advanced Academics, 17(2), 65-75. doi: 10.4219/jsge-2006-682. · DOI
- Robinson, N. (2010). The social world of gifted children and Youth. In S. Pfeiffer (Ed.), handbook of giftedness in Chil- dren. Psycho-educational theory, research and best practi- ces (pp. 33.52). New, York, USA: Springer.
- In S. Pfeiffer (Ed.), handbook of giftedness in Children. Psycho-educational theory, research and best practices (pp. 13-32). New, York, USA: Springer.
- Sánchez, P., Martín, S. & Carrillo, P. (2010). La psicología masculina. En G. Villagómez, E. Escoffié & L. Vera (Eds.), Varones y masculinidades en transformación (pp.191-208). Yucatán, México: UADY.
- Schunk, D. (1997). teorías del aprendizaje. Distrito Federal, México: Pearson.
- Shavelson, R., Hubner, J. & Stanton, C. (1976). Self- concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Re- view of educational Research, 46 (3), 407-441. doi: 10.3102/00346543046003407
- Shore, B. & Kanevsky, L. (1993). Thinking processes: being and becoming the gifted. In K. Heller, F. Monks y A. Pas- sow (Eds.), international handbook research and deve- lopment of giftedness and talent (pp. 137-147). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
- Silverman, L. (1990). Social and emotional education of the gifted: the discoveries of Leta Hollingworth. Roeper Re- view, 12 (3), 171-178. doi: 10.1080 /027 831 99009553265. · DOI
- Syed, Q. (2012). A study of loneliness and self-concept of male and female adolescent. indian streams Research journal, 2 (IV), 1-14. Recuperado en http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/ pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=35&sid=c8fd9d2e-8c4b-48c2- bace-af64b51ccb85%40.
- Valdés, A., Arreola, C. & Montoya, G. (2012). Estado del arte de la investigación acerca de estudiantes con aptitudes sobresalientes en México. En A. Valdés & J. Vera (Eds.), estudiantes intelectualmente sobresalientes (pp.156-170). Distrito Federal, México: Pearson.
- Valdés, A., Ramírez, C. & Martín, M. (2009). Motivación ha- cia el estudio de la Química en estudiantes de bachillerato tecnológico. Revista iberoamericana de educación, 48 (3), 1-11. Recuperado el 15 de Marzo de 2012 en http://www. rieoei.org/deloslectores/2361Cuervov2.pdf
- Valdés, A. & Vera, J. (2012). Hacia una definición del sobre- saliente. En A. Valdés & J. Vera (Eds.), estudiantes inte- lectualmente sobresalientes (pp. 2-13). Distrito Federal, México: Pearson.
- Valdés, A., Urías, M., Torres, G., Carlos, E. & Montoya, G. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas de un instrumento para medir motivación de logro en adolescentes con aptitudes so- bresalientes. En R. Pizá, L. Gassós & González, M. (Eds.), Proyectos de investigación de los Cuerpos Académicos del itson (pp. 211-219). Sonora, México: ITSON.
- Yañez, A. & Valdés, A. (2012). Políticas públicas y modelos para la identificación y atención de estudiantes sobresalien- tes en México. En A. Valdés & J. Vera (Eds.), estudiantes intelectualmente sobresalientes (pp. 141-156). Distrito Fe- deral, México: Pearson.
- Yañez, A., Valdés, A. & Vera, J. (2012). Caracterización del au- toconcepto de estudiantes con aptitudes intelectuales sobre- salientes. En R. Díaz-Loving, S. Rivera & I. Reyes (Eds.), Aportaciones actuales de la psicología social Volumen i (pp. 169-173). Nuevo León, México: AMEPSO.
- Winne, P., Woodlands, M. & Wong, B. (2001). Comparabili- ty of self-concepts among learning disabled, normal, and gifted student. journal of learning disabilities, 15 (8), 470-475. Recuperado de http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/ pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=21&sid=732335ac-7601-4361- 9474-c8bf8d597d90%40.
- Authors
- Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Published
- 1976-09
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407-441
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1046
- OpenAlex
- W2113346546
- Cited by
- 4,164
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 128 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 167 · 2023: 266 · 2022: 202 · 2021: 174 · 2020: 222 · 2019: 188 · 2018: 166 · 2017: 165 · 2016: 178 · 2015: 161 · 2014: 135 · 2013: 138 · 2012: 121
- FWCI
- 29.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
- Keywords
- self-concept, achievement motivation, social self-concept, gifted students, high-achieving students, academic performance, student subgroups, academic tutoring, student guidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
