Cited by 713Psychological and Educational Research StudiesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessCreativity in Education and Neuroscience

Interest, Prior Knowledge, and Learning

Tobias, Sigmund·1994·Review of Educational Research

Abstract

This article discusses the importance of studying interest and reviews research on the association between interest and prior knowledge. It is concluded that there is a substantial linear relationship between interest and prior knowledge. Previous findings of minimal interest-knowledge relationships were attributed to one, or more, of the following: (a) Knowledge and interest measures reflecting different content, (b) questionable reliability or validity of the measures, (c) ideographic assignment to high/low groups introducing error into group assignments, (d) use of materials not suited to the sample, and (e) possible confounding of interest and knowledge measures. Research suggests that working on interesting, compared to neutral, materials may engage deeper cognitive processing, arouse a wider, more emotional, and more personal associative network, and employ more imagery. A model of the interest-knowledge relationship is updated, and suggestions for further research are made. Finally, the similarity between interest and curiosity is explored, and the advantages of research on these constructs are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/00346543064001037

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Occupational knowledge demands align with the content of basic interest scales.

    “Occupational knowledge demands seamlessly align with the content of basic interest scales, as the connection between knowledge and interests has long been recognized.”
  • Abundant evidence in educational psychology supports a linear relationship between interest and knowledge.

    “Abundant evidence in educational psychology has supported the linear relationship between interest and knowledge, as interest help initiate initial engagement and motivates continued re-engagement in specific activities or content (Renninger & Hidi, 2022;Tobias, 1994).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 50 · Cited by 713

Authors
Tobias, S.
Affiliations
City College of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Tobias, Sigmund
Venue
Review of Educational Research
Published
1994-03
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
37-54
ISSN
  • 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1046
OpenAlex
W2130081384
Cited by
713
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 29
FWCI
21.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Keywords
interest, prior knowledge, curiosity, cognitive processes, associative networks, imagery, learning, interest measurement, knowledge assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review