The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relationship Between Research and Teaching: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
A review of various models of the relationship between research and teaching in universities is presented, and the evidence necessary to assess each model is outlined. A meta-analysis of 58 studies demonstrates that the relationship is zero. Suggestions for future directions are provided, and it is argued that a major goal could be to adopt strategies that enhance the relationship between research and teaching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marsh, H. W. (1987) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2 · Cited by 1,333
Self-citation
Cited by
How College Affects Students: Ten Directions for Future Research
Pascarella, E. T. (2006) · Journal of College Student Development · doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0060 · Cited by 355
Henderson, C., Dancy, M., & Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2012) · Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevstper.8.020104 · Cited by 322
Healey, M., Jordan, F., Pell, B., & Short, C. (2010) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703291003718968 · Cited by 192
Turner, N., Wuetherick, B., & Healey, M. (2008) · International Journal for Academic Development · doi:10.1080/13601440802242333 · Cited by 103
Which Strategies Best Enhance Teaching and Learning in Higher Education?
Hattie, J. (2011) · Empirical Research in Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1002/9781444395341.ch8 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 507-542
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1046
- OpenAlex
- W2151251644
- Cited by
- 1,004
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
