Cited by 140School Choice and PerformanceCritical Race Theory in EducationUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

Effects of School Racial Composition on K–12 Mathematics Outcomes: A Metaregression Analysis

Mickelson, Roslyn Arlin, Bottia, Martha Cecilia, Lambert, Richard·2013·Review of Educational Research

Abstract

Recently published social science research suggests that students attending schools with concentrations of disadvantaged racial minority populations achieve less academic progress than their otherwise comparable counterparts in more racially balanced or integrated schools, but to date no meta-analysis has estimated the effect size of school racial composition on mathematics outcomes. This metaregression analysis reviewed the social science literature published in the past 20 years on the relationship between mathematics outcomes and the racial composition of the K–12 schools students attend. The authors employed a two-level hierarchical linear model to analyze the 25 primary studies with 98 regression effects. Results indicate that school racial isolation has a small statistically significant negative effect on overall building-level mathematics outcomes. This relationship is moderated by the size of the sample in the study and by the way the independent variable was operationalized. Although it is small, the effect size is substantively meaningful. The effects are stronger in secondary compared to elementary grades, and racial gaps widen as students age. The emergence and widening of the race gaps as students move through the grades suggest that the association of racial segregation with mathematics performance compounds over time. Implications for educational policy and future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0034654312475322

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Racial composition may capture distinct contextual dynamics, such as peer norms, that shape preparation and achievement.

    “Similarly, racial composition, which has not previously been examined in the OVB framework, may capture distinct contextual dynamics, such as peer norms, that shape preparation and achievement (e.g., increased Black student isolation predicting larger achievement gaps) (Mickelson et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mickelson, R. A., Bottia, M. C., & Lambert, R.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Venue
Review of Educational Research
Published
2013-03
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
121-158
ISSN
  • 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1046
OpenAlex
W2161484981
Cited by
140
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3
FWCI
54.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Keywords
school racial composition, racial segregation, mathematics achievement, K-12 education, racial minority students, achievement gap, school integration, effect size, grade level differences, education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review