Cited by 8Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

A Longitudinal Analysis Using the Lisrel-Model with Structured Means

Hanna, Gila, Lei, Hau·1985·Journal of Educational Statistics

Abstract

The Lisrel-model with structured means was used to study similarities and differences between two groups of students on a longitudinal set of data. Inferences were made about the differences between the two groups in the development of mathematical ability as measured by two tests on three successive occasions, by testing the hypothesis that the slopes in the regression of true final scores on true initial scores are equal across the two groups, and by estimating the difference in the intercept alpha in the structural equation. The results indicated that the two groups started with equivalent mathematics ability. The Immersion group had a significantly higher level (2.52 points) of growth in mathematics ability than the Regular group at Grade 5; in the subsequent year, however, the Regular group exceeded the Immersion group by 2.15 points in its average growth. In comparison with the Regular group, the Immersion group grew more rapidly from grade 4 to 5 and more slowly from grade 5 to 6.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/10769986010002161

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models for repeatedly measured groups can be tested, which allows one to investigate black-white differences in cognitive development.

    “In addition, models for repeatedly measured groups can tested (e.g., Jöreskog, 1979;Marsh & Grayson, 1994, Hanna & Lei, 1985), which allows one to investigate black-white (say) differences in cognitive development.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanna, G., & Lei, H.
Affiliations
  • Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
  • Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto
Venue
Journal of Educational Statistics
Published
1985-06
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
161-169
ISSN
0362-9791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154525885
Cited by
8
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
longitudinal data, group differences, mathematical skills development, language immersion, structural equation modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review