A Longitudinal Analysis Using the Lisrel-Model with Structured Means
Abstract
The Lisrel-model with structured means was used to study similarities and differences between two groups of students on a longitudinal set of data. Inferences were made about the differences between the two groups in the development of mathematical ability as measured by two tests on three successive occasions, by testing the hypothesis that the slopes in the regression of true final scores on true initial scores are equal across the two groups, and by estimating the difference in the intercept alpha in the structural equation. The results indicated that the two groups started with equivalent mathematics ability. The Immersion group had a significantly higher level (2.52 points) of growth in mathematics ability than the Regular group at Grade 5; in the subsequent year, however, the Regular group exceeded the Immersion group by 2.15 points in its average growth. In comparison with the Regular group, the Immersion group grew more rapidly from grade 4 to 5 and more slowly from grade 5 to 6.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Models for repeatedly measured groups can be tested, which allows one to investigate black-white differences in cognitive development.
“In addition, models for repeatedly measured groups can tested (e.g., Jöreskog, 1979;Marsh & Grayson, 1994, Hanna & Lei, 1985), which allows one to investigate black-white (say) differences in cognitive development.”
From Investigating Spearman's Hypothesis by Means of Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2000) · cites this paper as Hanna & Lei, 1985
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Investigating Spearman's Hypothesis by Means of Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Dolan, C. V. (2000) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3501_2 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hanna, G., & Lei, H.
- Affiliations
- Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
- Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Statistics
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-169
- ISSN
- 0362-9791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154525885
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Statistics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- longitudinal data, group differences, mathematical skills development, language immersion, structural equation modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review